I agree that the format will not scale. Steve pointed out to me Docker's use cases page [1] as an example. I like their format a *lot* more, since it gives us a place to indicate the degree to which a company uses our software.
[1] https://www.docker.com/resources/usecases/ -=Bill On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Dave Lester <d...@davelester.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Given recent growth we've seen in Aurora the numbers of contributors and > public adopters, I think it's time for us to create a more-comprehensive > list of adopters.. README.md (the current home of our list) will soon > become cluttered if we continue to list companies there. :) > > Here's my proposal: in addition to updating our list of companies that > are using Aurora in a separate documentation page, it'd be valuable to > share any additional info about how it's being used + some testimonials. > That will, I hope, make this less of a vanity list (like Mesos has) and > more of a resource for folks that are looking at Aurora and trying to > understand how it's useful to them. > > If you're currently using Aurora in production or in a significant way, > please tell us about it! I'd love to include you in the revamped > documentation page. > > Huge thanks, > Dave >
