uf is to make
> backwards-compatible changes (and add /v2/, etc. endpoints if needed),
> but of course the design of Flight makes that a little harder than it
> should be. Both ADBC and Flight SQL have the question of whether adding
> fields to fixed schemas is really a backwards-co
It's not versioned. Best practice with gRPC/Protobuf is to make
backwards-compatible changes (and add /v2/, etc. endpoints if needed), but of
course the design of Flight makes that a little harder than it should be. Both
ADBC and Flight SQL have the question of whether adding fields to
Hello,
+1 from me (binding).
Side question: is the FlightSQL spec versioned?
Regards
Antoine.
Le 27/04/2025 à 11:45, David Li a écrit :
Hello,
Mateusz Rzeszutek has proposed adding a "remarks" field in xDBC column metadata
in Flight SQL [1]. This better aligns Flight SQL wit
w.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL: support remarks field in xDBC column
> metadata
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2025, 5:49 AM David Li wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Mateusz Rzeszutek has proposed adding a "remarks" field in xD
+1 (non-binding)
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
From: Matt Topol
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2025 6:21:33 AM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Flight SQL: support remarks field in xDBC column metadata
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Apr 27
+1 (binding)
On Sun, Apr 27, 2025, 5:49 AM David Li wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mateusz Rzeszutek has proposed adding a "remarks" field in xDBC column
> metadata in Flight SQL [1]. This better aligns Flight SQL with existing
> APIs including JDBC and ODBC.
>
>
Hello,
Mateusz Rzeszutek has proposed adding a "remarks" field in xDBC column metadata
in Flight SQL [1]. This better aligns Flight SQL with existing APIs including
JDBC and ODBC.
Mateusz has provided reference implementations and modified the integration
test for C++ [2], Go [3]
ers,
>
> We went ahead with duckdb, i have a very basic query, with this setup can
> we use Arrow ADBC, to interact with the flight sql server which internally
> is a wrapper on top of DuckDB to query the data from s3 and stream back to
> client
>
> For every client request the crede
Hi Community Members,
We went ahead with duckdb, i have a very basic query, with this setup can
we use Arrow ADBC, to interact with the flight sql server which internally
is a wrapper on top of DuckDB to query the data from s3 and stream back to
client
For every client request the credentials i
:25 PM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <
> > felipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Susmit,
> > >
> > > For an example of what David Li is proposing, you can take a look at
> this
> > > project (https://github.com/voltrondata/sqlflite). It'
Susmit
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 8:25 PM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <
> felipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Susmit,
> >
> > For an example of what David Li is proposing, you can take a look at this
> > project (https://github.com/voltrondata/sqlflite
wrote:
> Hi Susmit,
>
> For an example of what David Li is proposing, you can take a look at this
> project (https://github.com/voltrondata/sqlflite). It's a Flight SQL
> server
> (in C++ though) that can forward queries to either SQLite or DuckDB.
>
> --
> Felip
Hi Susmit,
For an example of what David Li is proposing, you can take a look at this
project (https://github.com/voltrondata/sqlflite). It's a Flight SQL server
(in C++ though) that can forward queries to either SQLite or DuckDB.
--
Felipe
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:22 AM David Li wrote:
wrapping both
these projects in Flight SQL floating around.)
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024, at 21:38, Susmit Sarkar wrote:
> Hi Community Members
>
>
> We are planning to build an Arrow flight server on top of data lying in s3.
>
>
> *Detailed Use Case:*
>
>
> The requiremen
Hi Community Members
We are planning to build an Arrow flight server on top of data lying in s3.
*Detailed Use Case:*
The requirement is we need to sync data from HDFS to a short term storage
S3 is our case. Basically a DataSync Service between cloud storages
I have already built the servic
The vote passes with 3 binding, 4 non-binding +1 votes. Thanks Joel!
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024, at 17:56, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 3:48 AM wish maple wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Xuwei Fu
>> ulk ingestion support for
+1
On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 3:48 AM wish maple wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Best,
> Xuwei Fu
> ulk ingestion support for Flight SQL
>
> David Li 于2024年4月5日周五 16:38写道：
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to A
+1 (non binding)
Best,
Xuwei Fu
ulk ingestion support for Flight SQL
David Li 于2024年4月5日周五 16:38写道：
> Hello,
>
> Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight
> SQL [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight
> SQL serv
+1 (non-binding)
Am Sa., 6. Apr. 2024 um 01:40 Uhr schrieb Sutou Kouhei :
> +1
>
> In <883d16f7-6221-4e93-a19a-df6d2204c...@app.fastmail.com>
> "[VOTE] Bulk ingestion support for Flight SQL (vote #2)" on Fri, 05 Apr
> 2024 17:37:57 +0900,
> "Davi
+1
In <883d16f7-6221-4e93-a19a-df6d2204c...@app.fastmail.com>
"[VOTE] Bulk ingestion support for Flight SQL (vote #2)" on Fri, 05 Apr 2024
17:37:57 +0900,
"David Li" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 10:37 AM David Li wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight
> SQL [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight SQL
> server to create or append t
ub.com/apache/arrow/pull/38385
>
> Thanks,
> Joel
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 4:38 AM David Li wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow
> Flight
> > SQL [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Ar
llo,
>
> Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight
> SQL [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight
> SQL server to create or append to a table, without having to know the
> specifics of the SQL or Substrait support
Hello,
Joel Lubinitsky has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight SQL
[1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight SQL server
to create or append to a table, without having to know the specifics of the SQL
or Substrait support on the server. The
> > > > and will get back to the community afterwards.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding paperwork for the Dremio code, thank you Laurent for offering
> > > > your help. Please do let us know if there's anything we can do to help
> > > > as w
There's a ticket for it already if anyone would like to help
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, at 12:02, James Duong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We fairly recently merged a PR to remove the experimental status for
> Flight SQL from maven: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040
>
> However o
Hi,
We fairly recently merged a PR to remove the experimental status for Flight SQL
from maven: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040
However our public documentation still has a warning saying Flight SQL is
experimental:
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/FlightSql.html
“Flight SQL is
t;
> > > Regarding paperwork for the Dremio code, thank you Laurent for offering
> > > your help. Please do let us know if there's anything we can do to help as
> > > well.
> > >
> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
> >
l discussing this internally
>> > > and will get back to the community afterwards.
>> > >
>> > > Regarding paperwork for the Dremio code, thank you Laurent for offering
>> > > your help. Please do let us know if there's anything we can do to help
>> > > as
the Dremio code, thank you Laurent for
> offering your help. Please do let us know if there's anything we can do to
> help as well.
> > >
> > > [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
> > >
> >
> > From: Laurent Goujon
> > Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 11:01 AM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for
> > Flight SQL ODBC driver
> >
> > Am I reading the ticket cor
re's anything we can do to help as well.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
>
> From: Laurent Goujon
> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 11:01 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][Flight
Hi David
Thanks, I'm preparing the PR and checking legal/ASF aspects in the meantime.
I will keep you posted asap. Sorry for the delay, I was busy with a
couple of other PRs on Iceberg ;)
Regards
JB
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:19 PM David Li wrote:
>
> I've closed the PMC vote. Once I see the PR
I've closed the PMC vote. Once I see the PR to apache/arrow with the license
headers attached, I will start the incubator vote to finalize this.
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024, at 01:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:02 PM David Li wrote:
>>
>> My unde
Correct.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:02 PM David Li wrote:
>
> My understanding is that if the employment contract for all developers
> involved stated that Dremio holds the rights, then only Dremio needs to grant
> rights to the ASF. Laurent pointed out that this is how Gandiva was do
Understood. Thanks for your explanation.
Best,
Alina
My understanding is that if the employment contract for all developers involved
stated that Dremio holds the rights, then only Dremio needs to grant rights to
the ASF. Laurent pointed out that this is how Gandiva was donated [1].
[1]: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-gandiva.html
Thank you for the update, David. JB / his colleagues would be working on the PR
to import the code to Arrow.
Regarding ICLAs, I believe Joy and Alex have filled out the ICLA already. Just
to confirm, since no individuals hold copyright over the code, ICLAs are no
longer required from the contri
Hi
I can also help on the PR for code donation (checking some legal
aspects at the meantime).
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:42 PM David Li wrote:
>
> (Apologies if this gets delivered twice; I used the wrong email the first
> time around and I _think_ it didn't send as a result.
(Apologies if this gets delivered twice; I used the wrong email the first time
around and I _think_ it didn't send as a result.)
I have updated the IP clearance form.
Dremio has informed me that no individuals hold copyright over the code. The
Software Grant has been filed. I will start a vote
Thank you both David and Jean-B, I had informed the contributors to put "arrow"
in the notify project field. Please update this thread after you're notified
regarding the receival of ICLAs.
Thanks,
Alina
Hi
Arrow should be used (not arrow-pmc).
Regards
JB
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 6:38 PM Alina Li wrote:
>
> Thanks for the confirmation, David. So, the only optional field they need to
> fill in on the ICLA form is the notify project field, and they need to put
> "arrow-pmc" in it?
Yes, but just "arrow" should be fine.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, at 12:38, Alina Li wrote:
> Thanks for the confirmation, David. So, the only optional field they
> need to fill in on the ICLA form is the notify project field, and they
> need to put "arrow-pmc" in it?
Thanks for the confirmation, David. So, the only optional field they need to
fill in on the ICLA form is the notify project field, and they need to put
"arrow-pmc" in it?
You would omit the Apache ID. That is for new committers.
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, at 12:59, Alina Li wrote:
> Hi David, thanks for the heads up. I'm still learning about the ICLA
> process, so I have some questions. According to Contributor agreements
> page [1], I see that an apache id is also ne
Hi David, thanks for the heads up. I'm still learning about the ICLA process,
so I have some questions. According to Contributor agreements page [1], I see
that an apache id is also needed if a contributor is submitting ICLA in
response to an invitation from a PMC. So, in order for the contribut
:
>> > > - Alex McRae
>> > > - João Victor Huguenin
>> > > - "joyc-bq" (I was unable to identify them)
>> > >
>> > > *it's possible they already have done this, please let me know if that's
>> > > the case.
&
done this, please let me know if that's
> > > the case.
> > >
> > > These people already have filed an ICLA, either as committers or when we
> > > did the JDBC driver donation:
> > > - James Duong
> > > - Jay Ho
> > > - Jose Almeida
> >
> > These people already have filed an ICLA, either as committers or when we
> > did the JDBC driver donation:
> > - James Duong
> > - Jay Ho
> > - Jose Almeida
> > - Rafael Telles
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator
t;> - James Duong
>> - Jay Ho
>> - Jose Almeida
>> - Rafael Telles
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-flight-sql-odbc.xml
>> [2]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.htm
- Jay Ho
> - Jose Almeida
> - Rafael Telles
>
> [1]:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-flight-sql-odbc.xml
> [2]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#grants
> [3]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/contri
14, 2023 8:23 AM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight
SQL ODBC driver
Ok, I've started to fill out the paperwork [1].
Dremio will need to fill out a Software Grant [2]. When submitting, please make
a note to notify the Ap
meida
- Rafael Telles
[1]:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/arrow-flight-sql-odbc.xml
[2]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#grants
[3]: https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html#clas
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023,
we can do to help as
>> well.
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
>>
>> From: Laurent Goujon
>> Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 11:01 AM
>> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][
v@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for
> Flight SQL ODBC driver
>
> Am I reading the ticket correctly that this is also about importing some of
> the Dremio code into Arrow project (namely
> https://github.com/dremio/flightsql-od
m/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules/platforms/cpp
From: Laurent Goujon
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 11:01 AM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight
SQL ODBC driver
Am I reading the ticket correct
gt;
>> In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com>
>> "[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500,
>> "David Li" wrote:
>>
>> > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page no
r of the initial pull request which triggered the
> discussion.
> > > I was focusing first on the comment in Maven pom.xml files which show
> up in
> > > Maven Central and other places, and which got some people confused
> about
> > > the state of the drive
up in
> > Maven Central and other places, and which got some people confused about
> > the state of the driver/code. IMHO this would apply to the current
> > Flight/Flight SQL protocol and code as it is today. Protocol extensions
> > should be still deemed experimental if s
+1
I think Flight SQL is not experimental anymore as it's actually used
in production on several players :)
Thanks for bringing this,
Regards
JB
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 6:59 PM David Li wrote:
>
> Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 7:18 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com>
> "[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500,
> "David Li" wrote:
>
> > Let&#x
vote just so we're on the same page now that
> we've discussed a few things.
> > >
> > > I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and
> make it stable:
> > >
> > > - Remove the 'experimental' option from
; > I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make
> > it stable:
> >
> > - Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf definitions (but leave
> > the option definition for future additions)
> > - Update specific
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:43 PM David Li wrote:
> >
> > > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've
> > > discussed a few things.
> > >
> > > I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from
+1
In <5e1c3154-a9f1-499d-be39-82685fefd...@app.fastmail.com>
"[VOTE] Flight SQL as experimental" on Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:42:09 -0500,
"David Li" wrote:
> Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've
> discussed a few
t; > Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've
> > discussed a few things.
> >
> > I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make
> > it stable:
> >
> > - Remove the 'experi
<<< text/html; charset=utf-8: Unrecognized >>>
publicKey - octalene.dev@pm.me - 0x21969656.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
+1 (binding)
Le 08/12/2023 à 20:42, David Li a écrit :
Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've
discussed a few things.
I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make it
stable:
- Remove the 'experime
start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've
> discussed a few things.
>
> I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make
> it stable:
>
> - Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf definitions (
Let's start a formal vote just so we're on the same page now that we've
discussed a few things.
I would like to propose we remove 'experimental' from Flight SQL and make it
stable:
- Remove the 'experimental' option from the Protobuf definitions (but leav
t; > [6]:
> >
> https://github.com/awslabs/amazon-timestream-odbc-driver/blob/main/src/odbc/include/timestream/odbc.h
> >
> > From: David Li
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 6:09 AM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][F
ote:
> > > >
> > > >> This applies to mostly existing APIs (e.g. recent additions are
> still
> > > >> experimental)? Or would it apply to everything going forward?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Micah
&
> > discussion.
> > > I was focusing first on the comment in Maven pom.xml files which show
> up
> > in
> > > Maven Central and other places, and which got some people confused
> about
> > > the state of the driver/code. IMHO this would apply to the curr
ch got some people confused about
> > the state of the driver/code. IMHO this would apply to the current
> > Flight/Flight SQL protocol and code as it is today. Protocol extensions
> > should be still deemed experimental if still in their incubating phase?
> >
> > Laur
___
> From: David Li
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 6:09 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for
> Flight SQL ODBC driver
>
> Thanks for the update, Alina. This sounds good, my only question
> I was focusing first on the comment in Maven pom.xml files which show up in
> Maven Central and other places, and which got some people confused about
> the state of the driver/code. IMHO this would apply to the current
> Flight/Flight SQL protocol and code as it is today. Protocol ex
light/Flight SQL protocol and code as it is today. Protocol extensions
should be still deemed experimental if still in their incubating phase?
Laurent
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:54 PM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> This applies to mostly existing APIs (e.g. recent additions are still
> experimental
This applies to mostly existing APIs (e.g. recent additions are still
experimental)? Or would it apply to everything going forward?
Thanks,
Micah
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 2:25 PM David Li wrote:
> Yes, we'd update the docs, the Protobuf definitions, and anything else
> referring to Fl
Yes, we'd update the docs, the Protobuf definitions, and anything else
referring to Flight SQL as experimental.
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, at 17:14, Joel Lubinitsky wrote:
> The message types defined in FlightSql.proto are all marked experimental as
> well. Would this include changes to a
databases now.
> > >
> > > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > >
> > > From: David Li
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM
> > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight S
s used in a good number of databases now.
> >
> > Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> >
> > From: David Li
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > Subjec
submit a PR for Flight
SQL ODBC driver
Thanks for the update, Alina. This sounds good, my only question for the
broader community is whether there is enough imported code that we should go
through the IP clearance process [1]. It's never been clear to me what exactly
the threshold for this i
, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental
>
> Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that
> it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should we remove this
> qual
+1 from me. It's used in a good number of databases now.
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
From: David Li
Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 9:59:54 AM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental
Flight S
At this point we depend on it heavily :)
+1
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:06 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com>
> "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54
> -0500,
> "Davi
+1
In <0336b0fb-87d1-4c68-b6dd-727678fe5...@app.fastmail.com>
"[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 -0500,
"David Li" wrote:
> Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that
> it'
Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given that it's
now used by a few systems for a few years now, should we remove this qualifier?
I don't expect us to be making breaking changes anymore.
This came up in a GitHub PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040
-David
y,
>
> I wanted to start a discussion regarding the development of Flight SQL
> ODBC driver. Regarding the seed usage to my previous email, our initial
> plan is that flightsql-odbc will be mostly used as-is other than
> changes to conforming to Arrow coding guidelines, and for Amaz
Hi community,
I wanted to start a discussion regarding the development of Flight SQL ODBC
driver. Regarding the seed usage to my previous email, our initial plan is that
flightsql-odbc will be mostly used as-is other than changes to conforming to
Arrow coding guidelines, and for Amazon
rote:
>> > > > For the record, the correct PR link seems to be
>> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38385
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Le 08/11/2023 à 21:49, David Li a écrit :
>> > > >> Hello,
>> >
ou wrote:
> > > > For the record, the correct PR link seems to be
> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38385
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le 08/11/2023 à 21:49, David Li a écrit :
> > > >> Hello,
> > > >>
Nov 9, 2023, at 04:36, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > > For the record, the correct PR link seems to be
> > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38385
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 08/11/2023 à 21:49, David Li a écrit :
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
&
//github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38385
> >
> >
> > Le 08/11/2023 à 21:49, David Li a écrit :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Joel Lubi has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight SQL
> >> [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset
>> Joel Lubi has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight SQL
>> [1]. This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight SQL
>> server to create or append to a table, without having to know the specifics
>> of the SQL or Substrait support
For the record, the correct PR link seems to be
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38385
Le 08/11/2023 à 21:49, David Li a écrit :
Hello,
Joel Lubi has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight SQL [1].
This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight SQL
Hello,
Joel Lubi has proposed adding bulk ingestion support to Arrow Flight SQL [1].
This provides a path for uploading an Arrow dataset to a Flight SQL server to
create or append to a table, without having to know the specifics of the SQL or
Substrait support on the server. The functionality
Hi devs,
>
> I would like to open a discussion around adding support for a native
> "ingest" command to the Flight SQL specification. The initial motivating
> use-case for this is to be able to support ADBC ingest when using the
> Flight SQL driver, which is currently
Hi devs,
I would like to open a discussion around adding support for a native
"ingest" command to the Flight SQL specification. The initial motivating
use-case for this is to be able to support ADBC ingest when using the
Flight SQL driver, which is currently not possible because th
Hi JB,
No problem! Thanks for joining the release vote! It's helpful!
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow Flight SQL adapter for PostgreSQL 0.1.0 -
RC6" on Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:50:11 +0200,
Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Sorr
+1 (non binding)
Sorry for the late reply (it took me time to review the release).
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 2:53 AM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC6) of
> Apache Arrow Flight SQL adapter for PostgreSQ
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
