The vote passes with 3 binding +1 votes, 2 non-binding +1 votes. Thanks all!
Binding votes: - Antoine Pitrou - Matt Toptol - David Li Non-binding votes: - James Duong - Saurabh Singh On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, at 19:15, David Li wrote: > It's not versioned. Best practice with gRPC/Protobuf is to make > backwards-compatible changes (and add /v2/, etc. endpoints if needed), > but of course the design of Flight makes that a little harder than it > should be. Both ADBC and Flight SQL have the question of whether adding > fields to fixed schemas is really a backwards-compatible change, too. > > My vote: +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, at 17:30, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> Hello, >> >> +1 from me (binding). >> >> Side question: is the FlightSQL spec versioned? >> >> Regards >> >> Antoine. >> >> >> Le 27/04/2025 à 11:45, David Li a écrit : >>> Hello, >>> >>> Mateusz Rzeszutek has proposed adding a "remarks" field in xDBC column >>> metadata in Flight SQL [1]. This better aligns Flight SQL with existing >>> APIs including JDBC and ODBC. >>> >>> Mateusz has provided reference implementations and modified the integration >>> test for C++ [2], Go [3], and Java [4]. >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/46087 >>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46110 >>> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/361 >>> [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/727 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> David
