It's not versioned. Best practice with gRPC/Protobuf is to make backwards-compatible changes (and add /v2/, etc. endpoints if needed), but of course the design of Flight makes that a little harder than it should be. Both ADBC and Flight SQL have the question of whether adding fields to fixed schemas is really a backwards-compatible change, too.
My vote: +1 (binding) On Tue, Apr 29, 2025, at 17:30, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Hello, > > +1 from me (binding). > > Side question: is the FlightSQL spec versioned? > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 27/04/2025 à 11:45, David Li a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Mateusz Rzeszutek has proposed adding a "remarks" field in xDBC column >> metadata in Flight SQL [1]. This better aligns Flight SQL with existing APIs >> including JDBC and ODBC. >> >> Mateusz has provided reference implementations and modified the integration >> test for C++ [2], Go [3], and Java [4]. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/46087 >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46110 >> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/361 >> [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/727 >> >> Thanks, >> David
