kou
In <20250423.161348.1822813613714377052@clear-code.com>
"Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:13:48
+0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It makes sense. Let's complete the followings in
> apache/arrow before we
otnet.)
>>
>> For example, should we complete "GH-44800: [C#] Implement
>> Flight SQL Client"
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44783 in apache/arrow?
>> Or should we continue it in apache/arrow-dotnet?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>>
ache/arrow?
> Or should we continue it in apache/arrow-dotnet?
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In <20250331.120021.2046206843285859352@clear-code.com>
> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 31 Mar 2025
> 12:00:21 +0900 (JST),
> Suto
de.com>
"Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:00:21
+0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've created https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet and
> opened an issue for importing commits from apache/arrow:
> https://gith
lude the C# implementation
but the next release of it will not include the C#
implementation.
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20250324.143530.31638564000205432@clear-code.com>
"Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:35:30
+0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
https://github.com/search?q=dotnet&type=repositories
* "csharp": 257K
https://github.com/search?q=csharp&type=repositories
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:
Hi,
Thanks for sharing your opinions. Let's use arrow-dotnet.
If there are any people who want to work on this, I'll help
them. Otherwise, I'll work on this like I did for
apache/arrow-go and apache/arrow-java.
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release pro
number of GitHub repositories that include "dotnet" or
> > "csharp" in their name:
> >
> > * "dotnet": 164K
> > https://github.com/search?q=dotnet&type=repositories
> > * "csharp": 257K
> > https://github.com/search
&type=repositories
> * "csharp": 257K
> https://github.com/search?q=csharp&type=repositories
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
> "[VOTE] Split C# release process"
+1
Bryce Mecum schrieb am Mo., 17. März 2025, 18:14:
> +1
>
> PS: Before we create the repo, we might discuss whether it should be
> called arrow-csharp or arrow-dotnet. I think the latter makes more
> sense.
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would li
+1
PS: Before we create the repo, we might discuss whether it should be
called arrow-csharp or arrow-dotnet. I think the latter makes more
sense.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
>
> Motivation:
>
> * We want to
+1
El lun, 17 mar 2025 a las 4:44, Curt Hagenlocher ()
escribió:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389....@clear-code.com>
> > "[VOTE] Split C# release proce
+1
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
> "[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900
> (JST),
> Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
+1
In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900 (JST),
Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
>
> Motivation:
>
> * We w
Hi,
I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
Motivation:
* We want to reduce needless major releases because major
releases require users' change
Approach:
1. Extract csharp/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-csharp like
apache/arrow-go
* Filter csharp/ related commits from
15 matches
Mail list logo
