Hi, I've created https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet and opened an issue for importing commits from apache/arrow: https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet/issues/1
Let's create issues on https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet for other tasks. Upcoming 20.0.0 release will include the C# implementation but the next release of it will not include the C# implementation. Thanks, -- kou In <20250324.143530.31638564000205432....@clear-code.com> "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:35:30 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for sharing your opinions. Let's use arrow-dotnet. > > If there are any people who want to work on this, I'll help > them. Otherwise, I'll work on this like I did for > apache/arrow-go and apache/arrow-java. > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <cagzxcpffmsafggv0huju3e8jv8xawdls9l7f2vhmieqx+3n...@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:36:03 > +1300, > Adam Reeve <adre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd also prefer arrow-dotnet, as I think the fact it's for use on the .NET >> platform is the more important factor to highlight rather than the language >> it's written in. The majority of users will be using C# but I'm sure there >> are some F# users of Arrow out there. >> >> That said, I don't feel that strongly against arrow-csharp either. >> >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 15:18, Curt Hagenlocher <c...@hagenlocher.org> wrote: >> >>> Yes, but can we weight each repository by the number of stars it has? :P >>> >>> I think arrow-dotnet is a better name, but it's a mild preference at best. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > The vote carries with 5 +1 binding votes. >>> > >>> > Let's discuss the new repository name as suggested by Bryce. >>> > Should we use arrow-dotnet not arrow-csharp? >>> > >>> > FYI: The number of GitHub repositories that include "dotnet" or >>> > "csharp" in their name: >>> > >>> > * "dotnet": 164K >>> > https://github.com/search?q=dotnet&type=repositories >>> > * "csharp": 257K >>> > https://github.com/search?q=csharp&type=repositories >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > -- >>> > kou >>> > >>> > In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389....@clear-code.com> >>> > "[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900 >>> > (JST), >>> > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > I would like to propose splitting C# release process. >>> > > >>> > > Motivation: >>> > > >>> > > * We want to reduce needless major releases because major >>> > > releases require users' change >>> > > >>> > > Approach: >>> > > >>> > > 1. Extract csharp/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-csharp like >>> > > apache/arrow-go >>> > > * Filter csharp/ related commits from apache/arrow and create >>> > > apache/arrow-csharp with them like we did for apache/arrow-go >>> > > * Remove csharp/ related codes from apache/arrow >>> > > 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does: >>> > > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/21de5d0b84289a0d37974fa6bd0852407d2c0d00/.github/workflows/test.yml#L347-L402 >>> > > 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-go and >>> > > apache/arrow-java. >>> > > >>> > > New release process: >>> > > >>> > > * apache/arrow-csharp will be released separated from >>> > > apache/arrow >>> > > * Curt will be a release manager of apache/arrow-csharp and >>> > > there are some PMC members who help apache/arrow-csharp >>> > > releases >>> > > * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months >>> > > but apache/arrow-csharp will use more longer major release >>> > > cycle >>> > > * apache/arrow-csharp will use more minor/patch releases >>> > > than apache/arrow >>> > > >>> > > See also the discussion of this: >>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/xbtq1ndjnljyo9jpm4ozblq9wx7hrc7y >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> > > >>> > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal >>> > > [ ] +0 >>> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks, >>> > > -- >>> > > kou >>> > >>>
