Hi,

When can we move the C# implementation to
apache/arrow-dotnet from apache/arrow?

There are some C# related PRs in apache/arrow:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Component%3A+C%23%22

Can we continue them in apache/arrow-dotnet? (PR authors
need to re-open PRs in apache/arrow-dotnet.)

For example, should we complete "GH-44800: [C#] Implement
Flight SQL Client"
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44783 in apache/arrow?
Or should we continue it in apache/arrow-dotnet?


Thanks,
-- 
kou

In <20250331.120021.2046206843285859352....@clear-code.com>
  "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:00:21 
+0900 (JST),
  Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've created https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet and
> opened an issue for importing commits from apache/arrow:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet/issues/1
> 
> Let's create issues on
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-dotnet for other tasks.
> 
> Upcoming 20.0.0 release will include the C# implementation
> but the next release of it will not include the C#
> implementation.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> kou
> 
> In <20250324.143530.31638564000205432....@clear-code.com>
>   "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:35:30 
> +0900 (JST),
>   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Thanks for sharing your opinions. Let's use arrow-dotnet.
> > 
> > If there are any people who want to work on this, I'll help
> > them. Otherwise, I'll work on this like I did for
> > apache/arrow-go and apache/arrow-java.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -- 
> > kou
> > 
> > In <cagzxcpffmsafggv0huju3e8jv8xawdls9l7f2vhmieqx+3n...@mail.gmail.com>
> >   "Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split C# release process" on Fri, 21 Mar 2025 
> > 15:36:03 +1300,
> >   Adam Reeve <adre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> I'd also prefer arrow-dotnet, as I think the fact it's for use on the .NET
> >> platform is the more important factor to highlight rather than the language
> >> it's written in. The majority of users will be using C# but I'm sure there
> >> are some F# users of Arrow out there.
> >> 
> >> That said, I don't feel that strongly against arrow-csharp either.
> >> 
> >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 15:18, Curt Hagenlocher <c...@hagenlocher.org> 
> >> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Yes, but can we weight each repository by the number of stars it has? :P
> >>>
> >>> I think arrow-dotnet is a better name, but it's a mild preference at best.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > The vote carries with 5 +1 binding votes.
> >>> >
> >>> > Let's discuss the new repository name as suggested by Bryce.
> >>> > Should we use arrow-dotnet not arrow-csharp?
> >>> >
> >>> > FYI: The number of GitHub repositories that include "dotnet" or
> >>> > "csharp" in their name:
> >>> >
> >>> > * "dotnet": 164K
> >>> >   https://github.com/search?q=dotnet&type=repositories
> >>> > * "csharp": 257K
> >>> >   https://github.com/search?q=csharp&type=repositories
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > --
> >>> > kou
> >>> >
> >>> > In <20250317.101329.2226182884160584389....@clear-code.com>
> >>> >   "[VOTE] Split C# release process" on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:13:29 +0900
> >>> > (JST),
> >>> >   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I would like to propose splitting C# release process.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Motivation:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > * We want to reduce needless major releases because major
> >>> > >   releases require users' change
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Approach:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 1. Extract csharp/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-csharp like
> >>> > >    apache/arrow-go
> >>> > >    * Filter csharp/ related commits from apache/arrow and create
> >>> > >      apache/arrow-csharp with them like we did for apache/arrow-go
> >>> > >    * Remove csharp/ related codes from apache/arrow
> >>> > > 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does:
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/21de5d0b84289a0d37974fa6bd0852407d2c0d00/.github/workflows/test.yml#L347-L402
> >>> > > 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-go and
> >>> > >    apache/arrow-java.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > New release process:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > * apache/arrow-csharp will be released separated from
> >>> > >   apache/arrow
> >>> > > * Curt will be a release manager of apache/arrow-csharp and
> >>> > >   there are some PMC members who help apache/arrow-csharp
> >>> > >   releases
> >>> > > * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months
> >>> > >   but apache/arrow-csharp will use more longer major release
> >>> > >   cycle
> >>> > >   * apache/arrow-csharp will use more minor/patch releases
> >>> > >     than apache/arrow
> >>> > >
> >>> > > See also the discussion of this:
> >>> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/xbtq1ndjnljyo9jpm4ozblq9wx7hrc7y
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> >>> > > [ ] +0
> >>> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > kou
> >>> >
> >>>
> 

Reply via email to