Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 56.0.0 RC2

2025-07-29 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) verified on manjaro Am Di., 29. Juli 2025 um 20:29 Uhr schrieb Andrew Lamb : > > Hi, > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, > version 56.0.0-rc2. > > Note this is RC2 as there was a problem with RC1[5], which I fixed in [6]. > > This release candida

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 21.0.0 - RC6

2025-07-14 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 binding, I checked the reproducibility. Thank you Kou, for all your help in getting the first automated signing going! Am Mo., 14. Juli 2025 um 12:38 Uhr schrieb Ruoxi Sun : > > +1 (non-binding) > > On my Intel Mac, OS version Sequoia 15.5 (24F74), AppleClang > 17.0.0.1713, verified cpp:

Re: [VOTE][JS] Release Apache Arrow JS 21.0.0 RC1

2025-07-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) Am Di., 1. Juli 2025 um 10:22 Uhr schrieb Raúl Cumplido : > > +1 (binding) > > I ran: > > dev/release/verify_rc.sh 21.0.0 1 > > on Ubuntu 24.04 with Node.js v20.19.3 > > > El mar, 1 jul 2025 a las 9:07, David Li () escribió: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Tested on Ubuntu 25.04/Node v22.1

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC member: Alenka Frim

2025-07-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Well deserved, congratulations Alenka! Raúl Cumplido schrieb am Di., 1. Juli 2025, 09:38: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Arrow has invited Alenka > Frim to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce that Alenka Frim > has accepted. > > Congratulations and welcome! >

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 55.2.0 RC2

2025-06-23 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1(binding) Ubuntu Am Mo., 23. Juni 2025 um 23:45 Uhr schrieb Adam Reeve : > > +1 (non binding) > > Verified on Fedora 42 x86_64 > > Thanks Andrew > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 06:17, Ed Seidl wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Verified on RHEL8 x86_64 > > > > Thanks! > > Ed > > > > On 2025/06/23

Re: [DISCUSS] Monorepo maintenance - closing stale issues and PRs

2025-06-21 Thread Jacob Wujciak
x27;t > >> want people to get the impression that we've forbidden it just because it > >> got auto-closed after some inactivity, it's just that it needs a champion > >> to push it through the bikeshedding. > >> > >> On Sat, Jun

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.3.1 RC0

2025-06-18 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) ubuntu 24.04 Am Mi., 18. Juni 2025 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Bryce Mecum : > > +1 (binding) > > Verified on macOS 15.5 (aarch64) by running `dev/release/verify_rc.sh > 18.3.1 0` with go version go1.24.4 darwin/arm64. > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 2:17 PM Matt Topol wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Monorepo maintenance - closing stale issues and PRs

2025-06-18 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Great, thanks Nic! +1 I think we should add a 'stale' label to issues we close this way, just so that if anyone finds a closed issue that might still apply (or someone wants to comb through these) we can differentiate them from other closed issues. I also think that we can probably just close eve

Re: Kapa.ai bot now live on the dev docs

2025-06-12 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
> 852 questions over the past month Wow, that's much more than I expected! Very cool, thanks again for your work on this Nic! On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 3:29 PM Nic Crane wrote: > An update for folks on this - I've extracted a few statistics below from > the main dashboard. We said it would be wo

Re: [VOTE][Swift] Split Swift to separated repository

2025-05-20 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Krisztián Szűcs schrieb am Di., 20. Mai 2025, 20:14: > +1 > > > On 2025. May 20., at 19:55, Wes McKinney wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:49 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> El mar, 20 may 2025 a las 4:14, Neal Richardson (< > >> neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>)

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Arrow 20.0.0 released

2025-05-20 Thread Jacob Wujciak
The Apache Arrow community is pleased to announce the 20.0.0 release. It includes 259 resolved issues [1] since the 19.0.1 release. The release is available now from our website and [2]: https://arrow.apache.org/install/ Read about what's new in the release at: https://arrow.apache.org/bl

Re: [DICSUSS] Split Swift to separated repository

2025-05-16 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Thanks Kou and also +1 to Raúl's idea of a policy! Am Fr., 16. Mai 2025 um 23:13 Uhr schrieb Andy Grove : > > +1 > > Thanks Kou. > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:27 AM Bryce Mecum wrote: > > > Thanks for this Kou. I think the change makes sense and is a good idea. > > > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.3.0 RC0

2025-05-08 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) Raúl Cumplido schrieb am Do., 8. Mai 2025, 18:10: > +1 (binding) > > I ran successfully on Ubuntu 24.04: > $ dev/release/verify_rc.sh 18.3.0 0 > > Thanks, > Raúl > > El jue, 8 may 2025 a las 4:30, Dewey Dunnington (< > dewey.dunning...@gmail.com>) > escribió: > > > +1 (binding) > >

Re: [VOTE] Split JS implementation and Release Process

2025-05-07 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) Am Mi., 7. Mai 2025 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Neal Richardson : > > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:51 AM David Li wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a é

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 18 - RC0

2025-05-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+ 1 (binding) I found a minor issue with a missing test dependency when running without conda, but it's not a blocker: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/2773 Am Mo., 5. Mai 2025 um 10:49 Uhr schrieb Raúl Cumplido : > > +1 (binding) > > Tested with: > USE_CONDA=1 dev/release/verify-relea

Re: [C++] Deprecate Skyhook?

2025-05-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 better to deprecate and remove it than have it bit rot along. As Aldrin says, we can always revive it if the bandwidth and interest is there. Am Mo., 5. Mai 2025 um 15:33 Uhr schrieb Aldrin : > > I think deprecating is a good idea. I haven't had time to try and maintain it > and I'm doubtful t

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 20.0.0 - RC2

2025-04-26 Thread Jacob Wujciak
2 > >> > >> * TEST_DEFAULT=0 \ > >> TEST_YUM=1 \ > >> LANG=C \ > >> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 20.0.0 2 > >> > >> with: > >> > >> * .NET SDK (9.0.200) > >> * Python 3.12.9 > &

[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 20.0.0 - RC2

2025-04-23 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hi, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache Arrow version 20.0.0. This is a release consisting of 253 resolved GitHub issues[1]. This release candidate is based on commit: 3ad0370a04ccdae638755b94c3c31c8760a11193 [2] The source release rc2 is hosted at [3]. The bi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 20.0.0 - RC2

2025-04-23 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) On 2025/04/23 09:40:36 Jacob Wujciak wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache > Arrow version 20.0.0. This is a release consisting of 253 > resolved GitHub issues[1]. > > This release candida

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Arrow Java 19.0.0 release ?

2025-04-20 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
gt; https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/660 > > 18.3.0 sounds good to me. > > El dom, 20 abr 2025 a las 10:19, Jacob Wujciak-Jens () > escribió: > > > Following SemVer if it's only fixes and dependencies it should be a patch > > version bump so 18.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Arrow Java 19.0.0 release ?

2025-04-20 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Following SemVer if it's only fixes and dependencies it should be a patch version bump so 18.2.1 Gang Wu schrieb am So., 20. Apr. 2025, 10:04: > +1 > > If this is not in a hurry, I'd like to be the release manager to go through > the release process. > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 2:21 PM Jean-Bapt

Re: [DISCUSS] Split JS release process

2025-04-15 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Yes, the linked discussion is titled "[Release] Split JS to its own repository" and has support from the main Arrow JS devs, so +1 from me as well :) Am Di., 15. Apr. 2025 um 13:59 Uhr schrieb Neal Richardson : > > Hi Raúl, > Thanks for starting this discussion. To be totally clear, is the proposa

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 55.0.0 RC1

2025-04-10 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (binding) Ubuntu 24.04 Am Do., 10. Apr. 2025 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Matthijs Brobbel : > > +1 (non-binding) > Verified on macOS 15.4 (aarch64) > > On 2025/04/08 15:31:08 Andrew Lamb wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, > > version 55.0.0. >

Re: [INFO] Arrow 20.0.0 feature freeze - April 1st, 2025

2025-04-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak
schrieb Jacob Wujciak : > > Hello Everyone, > > Just a quick reminder that the code freeze for 20.0.0 is in a week on April > 1st. > > There are currently 29 open issues assigned to 20.0.0 and no blockers! > [1] If there are any critical issues open please mark them as a

Re: [DISCUSS] Turtle canonical extension type

2025-04-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak
> It is a well known fact that the world turtle itself rests upon the back of > another turtle, What kind of heresy is this? Why would you omit the four elephants? How could the universe rest on a convex turtle shell without them? Until this glaring fault is addressed I am -0 Am Di., 1. Apr. 20

Re: Arrow Flight Endpoint Location URLs

2025-03-25 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hi Rusty! I think Matt was talking about the discussion in [1] and it's continuation [2] which led to [3]. If I am wrong Matt will surely correct me ^^ Best Jacob p.s. there is also [4] iirc that was much less arrow specific. [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/vfz74gv1knnhjdkro47shzd1z5g5ggnf

Re: [INFO] Arrow 20.0.0 feature freeze - April 1st, 2025

2025-03-25 Thread Jacob Wujciak
on the code freeze date. [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/65 Am Mi., 12. März 2025 um 18:15 Uhr schrieb Jacob Wujciak : > > Hello all, > > I'd like to propose a feature freeze date of Tuesday, April 1th, 2025 > for the upcoming 20.0.0 release of Arrow. Please

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Matthijs Brobbel (mbrobbel)

2025-03-21 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congratulations! 🎉 Andrew Lamb schrieb am Fr., 21. März 2025, 21:51: > Hi, > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Matthijs Brobbel > has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache > Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions! > > Andrew >

Re: [VOTE] Enable GitHub Discussions for apache/arrow-*

2025-03-21 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Am Fr., 21. März 2025 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Dewey Dunnington : > > +1! > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 7:58 AM Neal Richardson > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 5:18 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > happy to try it > > > > > > El vie, 21 mar 2025 a las 7:42, Jacob Q

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC member: Rok Mihevc

2025-03-19 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congratulations Rok! Will Ayd schrieb am Mi., 19. März 2025, 21:10: > Congratulations Rok! > > On 3/19/25 15:59, Matt Topol wrote: > > Congrats Rok! > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025, 3:56 PM Bryce Mecum wrote: > > > >> Congrats Rok! > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 12:10 PM Antoine Pitrou > >> wr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC member: Jacob Wujciak

2025-03-17 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Thank you everyone! Bryce Mecum schrieb am Mo., 17. März 2025, 17:25: > Congrats! > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 10:23 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Arrow has invited > > Jacob Wujciak to become a PMC member and

Re: [VOTE] Split C# release process

2025-03-17 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Bryce Mecum schrieb am Mo., 17. März 2025, 18:14: > +1 > > PS: Before we create the repo, we might discuss whether it should be > called arrow-csharp or arrow-dotnet. I think the latter makes more > sense. > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would li

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to enable GitHub Discussions for apache/arrow?

2025-03-16 Thread Jacob Wujciak
ect discussions to the ML then I think that hopefully solves > > the attention problem. > > > >> So we could use users@ for that but that might be > >> confusing, so discussions@ or something might be better. > > > > Why would it be confusing to use us

Re: [DISCUSS] Split C# release process

2025-03-15 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Also happy to help Curt with releases etc. Am Fr., 14. März 2025 um 21:08 Uhr schrieb Bryce Mecum : > > Hi Kou, thanks for proposing this. > > I think it makes sense and sounds like a good thing to do. I'm happy > to help with migration tasks and releases. > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 7:51 PM S

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to enable GitHub Discussions for apache/arrow?

2025-03-15 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 For me the main argument is that the discoverability is much better than the ML. A point to note, enabling discussions requires setting a ML that they are mirrored to. So we could use users@ for that but that might be confusing, so discussions@ or something might be better. For rust we used gi

Re: [RUST][LAZY CONSENSUS] Move object_store to its own repo

2025-03-12 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Just a quick note, there is no need for an INFRA ticket, as a PMC you can self-serve the repo creation in boxer [1]. Any repo secrets you might need can be set via the gh cli tool and also don't require an INFRA ticket anymore. INFRA only asks that you use an ARROW_ prefix for secrets. Thanks

[INFO] Arrow 20.0.0 feature freeze - April 1st, 2025

2025-03-12 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hello all, I'd like to propose a feature freeze date of Tuesday, April 1th, 2025 for the upcoming 20.0.0 release of Arrow. Please take a look through the milestone [1] to ensure it includes the issues you expect and to see if any need your attention. There are currently no open issues labeled as b

Re: [DISCUSS] Arrow Java: add RelWithDebInfo builds support

2025-03-12 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Thanks for testing this Logan! We probably have to clear some more disk space on the runner, this is a problem we have had before, they keep adding things to the image. A 5x increase seems a bit much to integrate into the normal builds, so Kou's approach is probably best? Am Mi., 12. März 2025 um

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jean-Baptiste Onofré

2025-03-11 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congrats! Am Mo., 10. März 2025 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Alenka Frim : > > Congratulations and welcome! > > V pon., 10. mar. 2025, 11:50 je oseba Rok Mihevc > napisala: > > > Congrats JB! > > > > Rok > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:59 AM Fokko Driesprong > > wrote: > > > > > Congrats JB! > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Arrow Java: add RelWithDebInfo builds support

2025-03-11 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hi JB, Sounds useful to me. As the JNI libarrow binaries are build in arrow-java I don't see an issue with adding this. Given that RelWithDebInfo has the same optimizations etc. as Release the main deciding factor to drop deb info is binary size. IIRC the java binaries are our largest artifacts a

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust Object Store 0.12.0 RC2

2025-03-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Ubuntu amd64 Am Mi., 5. März 2025 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Andrew Lamb : > > Hi, > > (NOTE THIS IS RC2) > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Object > Store Implementation, version 0.12.0. > > This release candidate is based on commit: > 3da5e0d010cb605c2f180c9564

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust Object Store 0.12.0 RC1

2025-03-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
a new key added, and simultaneously see if I can > find another volunteer to shepherd this release through. > > I'll also make a note to investigate if our verification scripts should > be updated to trust just the apache KEYS and ignore any local trusts, as > verification passed on m

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 53.4.1 RC1

2025-03-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+ 1 (non-binding) Ubuntu amd64 Am Mi., 5. März 2025 um 08:43 Uhr schrieb Xuanwo : > > +1 non-binding > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 08:18, Wayne Xia wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Verified on AMD64 ArchLinux. > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 3:57 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote: > > > >> +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 17 - RC0

2025-03-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Am Mi., 5. März 2025 um 05:51 Uhr schrieb David Li : > > My vote: +1 > > Tested on macOS 14.7/M1 > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 10:36, Dewey Dunnington wrote: > > +1 (binding)! > > > > Verified on MacOS 14 (aarch64) with `USE_CONDA=1 > > ./verify-release-candidate.sh 17 0` > > > > On

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust Object Store 0.12.0 RC1

2025-03-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
-1 as I think this was signed with the wrong key? gpg: Signature made Wed 05 Mar 2025 11:43:17 AM CET gpg:using RSA key BF5A4[...] gpg: Can't check signature: No public key vs gpg: key 03F0D5EA3790810C: "Raphael Jaen Taylor-Davies " Am Mi., 5. März 2025 um 11:47 Uhr schrieb Raphae

Re: [DISCUSS] Split R release process

2025-03-04 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Hello Everyone, We have discussed this in various locations but always came to the conclusion that due to the nature of the R package as bindings to libarrow, tracking it closely made it more convenient to stick to the monorepo, as Neal said. I think given the reduced development velocity/maturit

Re: [PROPOSAL] Arrow Java quarter release pace

2025-02-24 Thread Jacob Wujciak
> In order to give visibility to our community, I propose to have a regular > pace in Arrow Java releases I think a best effort regular release is good (at the minimum keeping dependencies current is worth it, looking at the number of recent dependabot PRs) and with the new, actual versioning it

Re: [DISCUSS] Monorepo GitHub workflow: allow one issue with multiple PRs

2025-01-21 Thread Jacob Wujciak
> I am pro resolving the 1:1 relation between PRs and issues dissolving* Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2025 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Jacob Wujciak : > > Thanks for restarting this discussion. In general I am pro resolving > the 1:1 relation between PRs and issues. At the moment I don't have a &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Monorepo GitHub workflow: allow one issue with multiple PRs

2025-01-21 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Thanks for restarting this discussion. In general I am pro resolving the 1:1 relation between PRs and issues. At the moment I don't have a firm view on what should replace it as a source of truth for changelogs etc. Though I am leaning towards using PRs/commits for that with issues just being used

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 16 - RC1

2025-01-11 Thread Jacob Wujciak
/tmp/arrow-adbc-16.7t7Ot for > > details. > > > > I am testing on Ubuntu 24.04. > > > > Thanks, > > Raúl > > > > > > El vie, 10 ene 2025 a las 5:42, David Li () escribió: > > > > > Yeah, it's not strictly required. I'll le

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 16 - RC1

2025-01-09 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Is it just a matter of building BigQuery in the docs job? In that case another RC isn't needed as you can update the asf-site branch manually. But depending on how easy RCs for adbc are that might be more work then another RC xD Am Fr., 10. Jan. 2025 um 03:55 Uhr schrieb David Li : > > Sorry...@ei

Re: [VOTE][Go] Release Apache Arrow Go 18.1.0 RC0

2025-01-09 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Ubuntu 24.04, x86_64 Am Fr., 10. Jan. 2025 um 00:57 Uhr schrieb David Li : > > +1 (binding) > > Tested on Debian 12, x86_64 > > I had to initialize submodules in my clone (as Matt pointed out to me) before > running the script. > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025, at 05:37, Matt Topol wrot

Re: [C++] Bump required CMake version

2024-12-09 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 on 3.25 Thanks for the summary kou. Am Mo., 9. Dez. 2024 um 23:02 Uhr schrieb Marcus Hanwell : > > I would push pretty strongly for 3.25 for the extra features. It would > enable much more modern, compact CMake code. > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 4:11 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Cur

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Arrow 18.1.0 released

2024-12-03 Thread Jacob Wujciak
The Apache Arrow community is pleased to announce the 18.1.0 release. It includes 19 resolved issues ([1]) since the 18.0.0 release. The primary motivation for this minor release was to address packaging issues for Python, Java, C#, R and MATLAB which caused binaries for those platforms to report

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC member: Gang Wu

2024-12-03 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Congrats! Am Di., 3. Dez. 2024 um 23:02 Uhr schrieb Wes McKinney : > > Congrats! > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 3:58 PM Micah Kornfield > wrote: > > > Congrats Gang! > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 1:31 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > > > > Awesome, congrats Gang! > > > > > > Op di 3 dec 2024 om 22:25

Re: [VOTE] Split Java release process

2024-11-21 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Am Fr., 22. Nov. 2024 um 03:06 Uhr schrieb David Li : > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024, at 10:47, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > (I replied to wrong thread...) > > > > In <20241122.103131.536851636597346186@clear-code.com> > > "[VOTE] Split Java releas

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 18.1.0 - RC2

2024-11-20 Thread Jacob Wujciak
t; > > >> > on macOS 15.1 (aarch64). I couldn't verify Python because I was > >> > getting consistent crashes in the Flight tests [1]. > >> > > >> > [1] https://gist.github.com/amoeba/6eb6cec9fbd5ee348221a35589cfa8e2 > >> > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Adam Reeve

2024-11-18 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congratulations and welcome Adam! Am Di., 19. Nov. 2024 um 03:31 Uhr schrieb wish maple : > > Congrets Adam! > > Best, > Xuwei Fu > > Sutou Kouhei 于2024年11月19日周二 08:31写道: > > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve > > has accepted an invitation to become a committer o

Re: [DISCUSS] Split Java release process

2024-11-18 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 Neal makes a great point >it makes sense that they should have a release process and cadence that >matches, and that those that are under active development should be able to >move ahead more freely. This also gives a more honest view into the implementation's development velocity, which in

[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 18.1.0 - RC2

2024-11-14 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hi, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache Arrow version 18.1.0. This is a release consisting of 15 resolved GitHub issues[1]. This release candidate is based on commit: 6a0414bd9a91e890ec6a45369bf61f405180628c [2] The source release rc2 is hosted at [3]. The bin

Re: 18.0.1 release manager

2024-11-07 Thread Jacob Wujciak
ore volunteers for releasemanager. > > >> Yes makes sense to spread the knowledge! > > > > > > I'm happy to help even more with the follow-up release but I think I'd > > > feel most comfortable with someone more familiar with the release > > > mana

Re: 18.0.1 release manager

2024-11-03 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hi, Kou I am not sure what you mean with changing location of the binaries in the links you just replaced the version number, do you want to publish them as github release artifacts similar to matlab? CRAN does not like github as a download source (because of purported 'flakiness'...) so it would

Re: 18.0.1 release manager

2024-11-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Hi, I agree that we should do another release. We just found an issue with the thrift urls when doing the R release that should also be fixed as it can cause issues on CRAN #44607. There is at least one other PR that just missed the RC (#43535) but would be nice to add. As it makes a new API publi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC member: Curt Hagenlocher

2024-10-30 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Congratulations! Am Do., 31. Okt. 2024 um 00:06 Uhr schrieb Neal Richardson < neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>: > Congratulations! > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:20 PM Ian Cook wrote: > > > Congratulations Curt! Thanks for all your hard work on the C# > > implementation and on ADBC! > > > > Ian > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Will Ayd

2024-10-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congrats and welcome! Am Di., 1. Okt. 2024 um 18:58 Uhr schrieb Antoine Pitrou : > > Hello Will, and thanks a lot for your involvement! > > > Le 01/10/2024 à 18:55, Dewey Dunnington a écrit : > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Will Wyd has > > accepted an invitation to bec

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Split Go release process

2024-08-29 Thread Jacob Wujciak
inding): > > Sutou Kouhei, David Li, Matt Topol, Raúl Cumplido, > > Antoine Pitrou, Joris Van den Bossche, Uwe L. Korn > > 4 +1 (non-binding): > > Jacob Wujciak, Ruoxi Sun, Xuwei Fu, Joel Lubinitsk > > 0 0: > > 0 -1: > > > > I'

Re: [VOTE] Split Go release process

2024-08-25 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 non-binding Am Mo., 26. Aug. 2024 um 04:37 Uhr schrieb Sutou Kouhei : > Hi, > > I would like to propose splitting Go release process. > > Motivation: > > * We want to reduce needless major releases because major > releases require users' change > > Approach: > > 1. Extract go/ in apache/arro

Re: [DISCUSS][Acero] Upgrading to 64-bit row offsets in row table

2024-08-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Thanks for the clear write up in the issue and PR! +1 it is clear that this is something that users want and the downsides seem minimal. Velox also switched to 64bit about a year ago. Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Weston Pace : > +1 as well. 32 bit keys were chosen because the expe

Re: [VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type

2024-08-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Dewey Dunnington : > +1 (binding). Thanks for this addition! > > Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs. > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:57 AM Weston Pace wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs. >

Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Creating a MathWorks File Exchange entry for the MATLAB interface

2024-08-02 Thread Jacob Wujciak
> trying to create any account. We imagine the email address affiliated with > the MathWorks account should be ASF-affiliated anyway, so we probably need > to wait for a PMC member for further guidance. > > > >> As the MLTBX files were built for 17.0.0 I don't see

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Java 11 support in Arrow

2024-07-31 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Thanks Dane for starting the discussion! I would be +1 but I am neither a Java user nor familiar with the space but seeing spark go 17+ is encouraging. Also worth mentioning is that people that can't drop 11 can always continue using the versions that still support it. Best Jacob Am Mi., 31. Jul

Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Creating a MathWorks File Exchange entry for the MATLAB interface

2024-07-30 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
out! INFRA not allowing write > access to code makes a lot of sense. We will reach out to the relevant team > internally to see if we can find a solution that doesn't involve providing > write access. Sorry for this complication. > > -- > > If we can't find a short-te

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 (non binding) wish maple schrieb am Mi., 24. Juli 2024, 15:12: > +1 (non-binding) > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > Best, > Xuwei Fu > > Gang Wu 于2024年7月24日周三 20:51写道: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:52 PM Joel Lubini

Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Creating a MathWorks File Exchange entry for the MATLAB interface

2024-07-01 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hey Kevin, I just took a brief look at the Exchange integration app and it requires the following permissions: > Read and write access to code and pull requests > Read access to administration and metadata INFRA will never allow any third party apps that require write access to code (not sure abo

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Arrow LinkedIn page

2024-05-24 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Great idea, thanks Ian! On 2024/05/24 16:40:17 Ian Cook wrote: > > Is it somehow possible to be a "member" of this account to indicate that > > we have PMC status, or is that not possible within the LinkedIn > > membership/permissions model? > > Yes, Arrow Committers and PMC Members may wish to a

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 16.1.0 - RC1

2024-05-14 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 > > non-binding votes and no -1 votes. > > +1 (binding): David Li, Raúl Cumplido, Sutou Kouhei > > +1 (non binding): Vibhatha Abeykoon, Ruoxi Sun, Rok Mihevc, Gang Wu, > > Bryce Mecum, Xuwei Fu, Jacob Wujciak > > > > I will start the post release tasks for 16.1.0. >

Re: Fwd: [C++] Parquet and Arrow overlap

2024-05-10 Thread Jacob Wujciak
; the states of all unresolved tickets and close some as needed. > > BTW, do we really need to make a full copy of them to have a mirror > in the Arrow GitHub issues? > > I'd like to seek a consensus here before sending the vote. > > Best, > Gang > > On Sat, May 1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 16.1.0 - RC1

2024-05-10 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) I tested C++ sources on pop_os 22.04 Am Fr., 10. Mai 2024 um 17:47 Uhr schrieb Raúl Cumplido : > +1 (binding) > > I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully on Ubuntu 22.04: > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh > 16.1.0 1 > TEST_DEFAUL

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Dane Pitkin

2024-05-07 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congrats! Am Di., 7. Mai 2024 um 23:19 Uhr schrieb Bryce Mecum : > Congrats Dane! > > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 5:53 AM Joris Van den Bossche > wrote: > > > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Dane Pitkin has > > accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache Arrow. Wel

Re: [VOTE][Format] JSON canonical extension type

2024-04-30 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for moving these two forward Rok! Am Di., 30. Apr. 2024 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Rok Mihevc : > Hi all, thanks for the votes and comments so far. > I've amended [1] the proposed language with the RFC-8259 requirement as it > seems to be almost unanimously requested. New langua

Re: [VOTE][Format] UUID canonical extension type

2024-04-30 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Am Di., 30. Apr. 2024 um 17:48 Uhr schrieb Weston Pace < weston.p...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 7:53 AM Rok Mihevc wrote: > > > Thanks for all the reviews and comments! I've included the big-endian > > requirement so the proposed language is now as be

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop Java 8 support

2024-04-30 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hello everyone! Great to see this move forward! +1 on dropping both 8 and 11 unless there is very good reason to keep 11 around. Otherwise people will just move to 11 and then have the pain of migration again when we drop that (which will happen soon regardless imo). Am Di., 30. Apr. 2024 um 16:18

Re: Fwd: PyArrow Using Parquet V2

2024-04-24 Thread Jacob Wujciak
t; to > > > > > specify your desired version, but it can be dangerous to produce > data > > > in > > > > a > > > > > moving-target format. For example, let's say you write a bunch of > > data > > > in > > > >

Re: Fwd: PyArrow Using Parquet V2

2024-04-23 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hello, First off, please try to clean up formating of emails to be legible when forwarding/quoting previous messages multiple times, especially when most of the quotes do not contain any useful information. It makes it much easier to parse the message and thus quicker to answer. The short answ

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Sarah Gilmore

2024-04-11 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congratulations and welcome! Am Do., 11. Apr. 2024 um 17:11 Uhr schrieb Raúl Cumplido : > Congratulations Sarah! > > El jue, 11 abr 2024 a las 13:13, Sutou Kouhei () > escribió: > > > > Hi, > > > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Sarah > > Gilmore has accepted an invitation

Re: [DISCUSS] Versioning and releases for apache/arrow components

2024-04-08 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Thanks for the eager discussion, great to see that we are aligned on the broad strokes! In general I think that this is not something we neither need to nor want to implement from 0 to 100. Incrementally evolving and evaluating our process is key for sucsh a core change > I think C#, JS, [Java], a

Re: [VOTE] Bulk ingestion support for Flight SQL (vote #2)

2024-04-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+1 (non-binding) Am Sa., 6. Apr. 2024 um 01:40 Uhr schrieb Sutou Kouhei : > +1 > > In <883d16f7-6221-4e93-a19a-df6d2204c...@app.fastmail.com> > "[VOTE] Bulk ingestion support for Flight SQL (vote #2)" on Fri, 05 Apr > 2024 17:37:57 +0900, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Joel Lubinit

Re: [VOTE] Add new info codes and options keys to ADBC specification

2024-04-05 Thread Jacob Wujciak
+ 1 (non-binding) Am Sa., 6. Apr. 2024 um 01:57 Uhr schrieb Joel Lubinitsky < joell...@gmail.com>: > Yes, just updated both the issue and the PR. > > Thanks, > Joel > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:51 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Could you also update the description of > > https://github

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer Joel Lubinitsky

2024-04-02 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congratulations and welcome Joel! Joel Lubinitsky schrieb am Di., 2. Apr. 2024, 14:21: > Thanks everyone! It's such a privilege to be working with you all, looking > forward to building even more. > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2024 at 5:34 PM David Li wrote: > > > Congrats Joel! > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 202

[DISCUSS] Versioning and releases for apache/arrow components

2024-03-28 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Hello Everyone! I would like to resurface the discussion of separate versioning/releases/voting for monorepo components. We have previously touched on this topic mostly in the community meetings and spread across multiple, only tangential related threads. I think a focused discussion can be a bit

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Bryce Mecum

2024-03-17 Thread Jacob Wujciak
Congrats, well deserved! Nic Crane schrieb am Mo., 18. März 2024, 03:24: > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Bryce Mecum has > accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache Arrow. Welcome, and > thank you for your contributions! > > Nic >

Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposed "Category B" License for Bundling MATLAB MEX Build Artifacts in Official Arrow Release

2024-03-12 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
That's great news, thank you both for your efforts! Best, Jacob On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 6:45 PM Sarah Gilmore wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > > > We just wanted to close the loop on this discussion. > > > > After further discussion with our colleagues at MathWorks, we determined > that we can license

Re: [VOTE] Move Arrow DataFusion Subproject to new Top Level Apache Project

2024-03-03 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 3:39 AM Yang Jiang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 2024/03/01 18:08:26 Daniël Heres wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024, 19:05 Chao Sun wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 9:59 AM QP Hou wrote: > > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jay Zhan

2024-02-20 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Congrats and welcome! On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 9:45 AM Christiano Anderson wrote: > Congrats! > > On 16/02/2024 11:25, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Jay Zhan > > has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache > > Arrow. Welcome, and than

Re: New tag for releases for R-universe

2024-02-10 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Thanks Nic. For a versioned history I planned to also have the versioned 'apache-arrow-x.y.z-cran' tags or maybe 'apache-arrow-x.y.z-r' would be less ambiguous as Nic mentioned. The r-universe tag is unversioned so we can update it without any changes on the r-universe side. On Sat, Feb 10, 2024

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jeffrey Vo

2024-02-07 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Congrats 🎉 Raúl Cumplido schrieb am Mi., 7. Feb. 2024, 14:02: > Congratulations Jeffrey! > > El mié, 7 feb 2024 a las 14:00, Andrew Lamb () > escribió: > > > > Congratulations Jeffrey! Well deserved! > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies > > wrote: > > > > > On behalf of

Re: [VOTE] Accept donation of Comet Spark native engine

2024-01-27 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 (non-binding) Jorge Cardoso Leitão schrieb am So., 28. Jan. 2024, 05:17: > +1 > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2024, 00:00 Wes McKinney, wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 12:26 PM Micah Kornfield > > wrote: > > > > > +1 Binding > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 10:21 AM David Li

Re: [DISC] Improve Arrow Release verification process

2024-01-19 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
I concur, a minimally scoped verification script for the actual voting process without any binary verification etc. should be created. The ease in verifying a release will lower the burden to participate in the vote which is good for the community and will even be necessary if we ever want to incre

Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MATLAB interface

2023-11-10 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
GitHub releases do have a prerelease/rc status that can be activated. Maybe that could be used as an indicator to not include theses on the exchange site? Sarah Gilmore schrieb am Fr., 10. Nov. 2023, 21:06: > Hi Raúl, > > > Currently all the binaries are generated on the third step of the > > Re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 14.0.0 - RC2

2023-10-24 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 (non-binding) pop_os 22.04 On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 8:14 PM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > Hi Bryce, > > This happened on the verification tasks and is related to this issue [1]. > > It should be solved if you pull the latest main and the related > testing submodules. > > Thanks, > Raúl > > [1] https

  1   2   3   >