+1 (non-binding)
Am Fr., 22. Nov. 2024 um 03:06 Uhr schrieb David Li <lidav...@apache.org>: > > +1 (binding) > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024, at 10:47, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > (I replied to wrong thread...) > > > > In <20241122.103131.536851636597346186....@clear-code.com> > > "[VOTE] Split Java release process" on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:31:31 +0900 > > (JST), > > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose splitting Java release process. > >> > >> Motivation: > >> > >> * We want to reduce needless major releases because major > >> releases require users' change > >> * We want to reduce apache/arrow's release cost > >> > >> Approach: > >> > >> 1. Extract java/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-java like > >> apache/arrow-go > >> * Filter java/ related commits from apache/arrow and create > >> apache/arrow-java with them like we did for apache/arrow-go > >> * Remove java/ related codes from apache/arrow > >> 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does: > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/main/.github/workflows/test.yml > >> 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-go > >> * We may try sharing release related tools by creating a > >> new apache/arrow-SOMETHING (apache/arrow-release?) > >> repository > >> > >> New release process: > >> > >> * apache/arrow-java will be released separated from > >> apache/arrow > >> * Gang or David will be a release manager of apache/arrow-java > >> * Other committers and PMC members including me help a > >> release manager > >> * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months > >> but apache/arrow-java will use more longer major release > >> cycle > >> * apache/arrow-java will use more minor/patch releases than > >> apache/arrow > >> > >> > >> See also the discussion of this: > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/b99wp2f3rjhy09sx7jqvrfqjkqn9lnyy > >> > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> kou
