+1 (non-binding) Thanks for moving these two forward Rok! Am Di., 30. Apr. 2024 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com >:
> Hi all, thanks for the votes and comments so far. > I've amended [1] the proposed language with the RFC-8259 requirement as it > seems to be almost unanimously requested. New language is below. > To Micah's comment regarding rejecting Binary arrays [2] - please discuss > in the PR. > > Let's leave the vote open until after the May holiday. > > Rok > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41257/commits/594945010e3b7d393b411aad971743ffcdbdbc8e > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41257#discussion_r1583441040 > > > JSON > ==== > > * Extension name: `arrow.json`. > > * The storage type of this extension is ``StringArray`` or > or ``LargeStringArray`` or ``StringViewArray``. > *Only UTF-8 encoded JSON as specified in `rfc8259`_ is supported.* > > * Extension type parameters: > > This type does not have any parameters. > > * Description of the serialization: > > Metadata is either an empty string or a JSON string with an empty object. > In the future, additional fields may be added, but they are not required > to interpret the array. >
