+1 to the existing suggestions, this is such a great thread, great start to
the year!
A theme from this thread I would like to pick up is "community ux": The
community overview on the arrow page is quite small and afaik the different
syncalls and zulip are not documented anywhere, so we should impr
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow DataFusion Implementation,
version 16.0.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
dcd52ee3d87c4dd9e2c176165e9e20644f66988b [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
The changelog is located at [3].
Please download
We have used pull request templates in the various rust projects to good
effect: most PRs clearly describe what they are doing and why.
For your reference, they are at arrow-rs[1] and arrow-datafusion[2].
[1]
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/arrow-rs/master/.github/pull_request_template.m
Hi,
I have added AVX512 kernels back in times but they got removed with a
reason that I don't agree. (No objections, that was the maintainers
decision.)
I am totally in line with you and prefer having feature gated SIMD
supersets for the compilation and have compile time selection. I was
working
+1
Thanks
vin jake 于2023年1月7日周六 19:13写道：
> +1
>
> L. C. Hsieh 于 2023年1月7日周六 16:11写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks Andy.
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 12:04 AM Andrew Lamb
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 -- thank you for driving this Andy
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:49 PM Andy Grove
> wrote:
> >
Hi,
For reference, the C++ implementation is compiled by default with SSE4.2
enabled. We had some rare bug reports of people using very old CPUs
where Arrow C++ would crash (for example for lack of POPCNT instruction,
which is very useful for fast null count computation).
We also have some
Hi,
It is fairy common to see binaries in the wild making use of the Rust
arrow libraries compiled with extremely limited SIMD support enabled. As
I imagine others in the community have run into this before, I thought
I'd send an email to solicit thoughts.
There are a couple of things that m
+1
L. C. Hsieh 于 2023年1月7日周六 16:11写道：
> +1
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 12:04 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > +1 -- thank you for driving this Andy
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:49 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > > The IP clearance form is now visible on the web site:
> > >
> http
>
> I replied in the GitHub thread [1], but will say that I am +1 on Priority:
> Blocker and Priority: Critical. Though I wonder if we could use "Critical
> Fix" in place of "Priority: Critical"? Unless we have two different
> definitions. As is, the names are similar enough that it could be
> conf
+1
Thanks Andy.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 12:04 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> +1 -- thank you for driving this Andy
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:49 PM Andy Grove wrote:
>
> > The IP clearance form is now visible on the web site:
> > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-datafusion-substrait.
+1 -- thank you for driving this Andy
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:49 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> The IP clearance form is now visible on the web site:
> https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/arrow-datafusion-substrait.html
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 9:33 AM Wayne Xia wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Daniël
11 matches
Mail list logo
