> > I replied in the GitHub thread [1], but will say that I am +1 on Priority: > Blocker and Priority: Critical. Though I wonder if we could use "Critical > Fix" in place of "Priority: Critical"? Unless we have two different > definitions. As is, the names are similar enough that it could be > confusing. Perhaps I can draft a full definition of "Critical Fix", and > then we can discuss based on that? (I assume at the very least that > Priority Critical never refers to features, right?) > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14593 >
Agreed on the Priority: Blocker and Priority: Critical. A shared definition would indeed be useful! I think best place to put it would be in the issue creation interface [2]. [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new?assignees=&labels=Type%3A+bug&template=bug_report.yaml Rok
