+1 (non-binding)
> On Feb 27, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Neal Richardson
> wrote:
>
> We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
> ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent maintenance
> releases. In [1] we proposed allowing maintenance/patch releases
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 12:32 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In
> "[VOTE] Allow source-only release vote for patch releases" on Sat, 27
> Feb 2021 08:19:31 -0800,
> Neal Richardson wrote:
>
> > We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
> > ways
Here is a proposed improvement to merge_pr.py that will offer to create a
JIRA issue from a github PR if one does not exist:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9598
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 4:50 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Read more (this is one ASF member's interpretation of the Openness
> tenet
+1
In
"[VOTE] Allow source-only release vote for patch releases" on Sat, 27 Feb
2021 08:19:31 -0800,
Neal Richardson wrote:
> We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
> ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent maintenance
> releases. In
+1
Le 27/02/2021 à 17:19, Neal Richardson a écrit :
We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent maintenance
releases. In [1] we proposed allowing maintenance/patch releases on which
we vote only to app
Speaking of Arrow's JS implementation, there's one small (+2 −2) JS
pull request in the queue that could use a review.
ARROW-11706: [JS] Better BigInt compatibility check
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-11706
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9110
Have a great weekend,
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 11:11 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 9:32 AM Benjamin Kietzman
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 11:23 Eric Burden wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 10:19 AM Neal Richardson <
+1 (binding)
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 9:32 AM Benjamin Kietzman
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 11:23 Eric Burden wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 10:19 AM Neal Richardson <
> > neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We've had some discussion about way
+1 (non binding)
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 11:23 Eric Burden wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 10:19 AM Neal Richardson <
> neal.p.richard...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
> > ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make mo
+1
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 10:19 AM Neal Richardson
wrote:
> We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
> ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent maintenance
> releases. In [1] we proposed allowing maintenance/patch releases on which
> we vote o
We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and
ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent maintenance
releases. In [1] we proposed allowing maintenance/patch releases on which
we vote only to approve the source package, unlike our quarterly major
releas
Hi Dominik,
That sounds really interesting -- thank you for the offer
I for one would enjoy seeing a demo and suggest that 10 minutes might be a
good length. The next call (details are also on the announcement [1]) is
scheduled for Wednesday March 10, 2021 at 09:00 PST / 12:00 EST / 17:00
UTC. T
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-02-27-0
All tasks:
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2021-02-27-0
Failed Tasks:
- test-build-vcpkg-win:
URL:
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2021-02-27-0-github-test-build-vcpkg-w
13 matches
Mail list logo
