+1 (binding) On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 12:32 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> +1 > > In <caocv4hjsdgpcrppnes95hpdzxvaoenpekta95r7gofgctib...@mail.gmail.com> > "[VOTE] Allow source-only release vote for patch releases" on Sat, 27 > Feb 2021 08:19:31 -0800, > Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and > > ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent > maintenance > > releases. In [1] we proposed allowing maintenance/patch releases on which > > we vote only to approve the source package, unlike our quarterly major > > releases, where we vote on the source and on most binary packages as > well. > > Maintainers of the various implementations and subprojects may choose to > > build and publish binary artifacts from these patch release sources after > > the release vote, if there are relevant bug fixes in the patch release. > > This procedure will allow us to make patch releases more easily, and we > > maintain our shared mapping between a GitHub tag/commit and a release > > number across all subprojects. > > > > Please vote whether to adopt the patch release procedure. The vote will > be > > open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Allow source-only patch release votes > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not allow source-only patch release votes because... > > > > Here is my vote: +1 > > > > Thanks, > > Neal > > > > [1]: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0ff484bcf8e410730ddcba447ff0610e7138f16d035c43a4015da187%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E >
