+1 In <caocv4hjsdgpcrppnes95hpdzxvaoenpekta95r7gofgctib...@mail.gmail.com> "[VOTE] Allow source-only release vote for patch releases" on Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:19:31 -0800, Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've had some discussion about ways to reduce the cost of releasing and > ways to allow maintainers of subprojects to make more frequent maintenance > releases. In [1] we proposed allowing maintenance/patch releases on which > we vote only to approve the source package, unlike our quarterly major > releases, where we vote on the source and on most binary packages as well. > Maintainers of the various implementations and subprojects may choose to > build and publish binary artifacts from these patch release sources after > the release vote, if there are relevant bug fixes in the patch release. > This procedure will allow us to make patch releases more easily, and we > maintain our shared mapping between a GitHub tag/commit and a release > number across all subprojects. > > Please vote whether to adopt the patch release procedure. The vote will be > open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Allow source-only patch release votes > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not allow source-only patch release votes because... > > Here is my vote: +1 > > Thanks, > Neal > > [1]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0ff484bcf8e410730ddcba447ff0610e7138f16d035c43a4015da187%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
