Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 07:33 Subject: Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant > PMC: can we grant more people access to the sandbox ? Or should we just use > jakarta-common

pointer to half-hearted official MS.NET ant-ish tool

heh, microsoft have just released an automated tool to build, test and deploy your .net apps: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=b32497b0-77f7-4831- 9c55-58bf3962163e&DisplayLang=en with description here, in a winzip exe wrapper around what is really a PDF File http://www.m

Re: [PATCH] [17471] -projecthelp does not work with -quiet

Well, we need to be sure it needs fixing :) This may sound silly but -projecthelp -verbose is more informative than the default listing, so the quiet listing should be less informative. The issue is how much less informative - Original Message - From: "Loïc Péron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: 1.5.3?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 09:43 Subject: Re: 1.5.3? > > 1.5.3 seems needed - and ASAP. > > Maybe we should withdrawl the 1.5.2 distribution. It happened to other > projects. > How about calling

Re: sync files with Ant?

- Original Message - From: "Brennan Stehling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 16:17 Subject: sync files with Ant? > I would like to build a sync capability as an Ant feature but I think I > need some pointers with getting s

tests failing

i have been lax on running tests for a while; now I am seeing (on winXP, single CPU) :- Testcase: testCreateWithEmptyFileset(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JarTest Caused an ERROR null java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Zip.isEmpty(Zip.java:1082) at org.

Re: tests failing

- Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 00:22 Subject: Re: tests failing > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i have been lax on runnin

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

- Original Message - From: "Diane Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:17 Subject: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant OK, this is me, I need to set up the build to exclude DotnetTest > [junit] Testcase: testCSC(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.opti

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 14:50 Subject: 1.6 milestones ? > Hi, > > Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone > builds ? > > Tomcat5 is getting stable, and the

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

can we have the patch as diff -u then ? - Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 15:36 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > Pretty please :

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

- Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:41 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > The diff -u is now the latest attachement to the bug. g

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

I am more minded to put the subant in there, with perhaps some minor tweaks. The reason to use a separate task when there are major changes in functionality are (a) we can have more sensible defaults (here: property inheritance, and what happens when you invoke a target called "" . I'd like that t

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Goodnough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:54 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement > This new ant task has no support for running several targets, forking, > child->pare

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

- Original Message - From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 07:55 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement > But where does it stop? also supports automatic ordering of the > projects call

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

- Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 13:04 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > Steve, My build process will rely heavily on this task t

Re: JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 15:28 Subject: JDK 1.1 support > I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following > > 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would b

subant

subant is in as a core task; DD says he's signed the handoff form already. I made two changes to his submission, both related to targeting. 1. target="" implies we want to invoke the default target. This lets you control target in a property and have "" map to something meaningful 2. commented

Re: JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 16:10 Subject: Re: JDK 1.1 support > > > > > yes, that was my fault, wasnt it. File a bug against me :) > > > > :-) > I was discussing with someone

Re: JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 16:53 Subject: Re: JDK 1.1 support > Then let's figure out if we shouldn't drop JDK1.1 now. > > Is there any active committer that uses JDK1.1 ? Are any active committe

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:02 Subject: RE: 1.6 milestones ? > > I know few people may like the JDK1.4 approach ( "put everything in > rt.jar"), but I think it would be better to have more flex

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

Jose Alberto is secretly the bastion of declarative programming purity on this mail list, having a prolog background in the past. So if he thinks the conditionals (and I'd lump try/catch) in there, then he may have a point. I myself am mostly happy with conditional targets *and* conditional . But

Re: java 1.1 on linux

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1.5.1 and 1.5: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Bad major version number I thought Magesh had carefully compiled everything with target=1.1 and so on. If this turns out to not work with JDK 1.1, it is another case for

Re: ssh exec task...

- Original Message - From: "Dale Anson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 14:57 Subject: Re: ssh exec task... > How do I post changes to the optional/ssh files to cvs? > > Dale > run cvs diff -u against the files to create .d

Re: java 1.1 on linux

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 14:26 Subject: Re: java 1.1 on linux > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:17 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > > > > Ok - last week we had a proposal, discussions o

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 23:21 Subject: Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support > > BTW, maintaining support for the widest range of users and OSes for so long > is very hard, my congratulations to all who

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 22:45 Subject: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support > Hi, > > This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and user > lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyone i

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

Dominique Devienne wrote: I'm not following this line of thought... From what I gathered, JDK 1.1 support is already broken in a few places in Ant 1.5.x, *and* there are very few 1.1 users since nobody ever complained about 1.5.1/2's bytecode not being 1.1 compatible! Leaving JDK 1.1 behind should

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

Christoph Wilhelms wrote: Hi Costin! +1 on your comment ( and a preemptive -1 on changing any public method that uses Hashtables to use Maps - "just because we can" :-). Using Maps in new code or tasks should be fine. Refactoring some of the introspection code - like support for context class

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Ant 1.5.3

Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to propose this vote for the Ant 1.5.3 release plan: Mon 24-March-2003 I will build Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 The primary purpose of this release is to correct a few bugs discovered in Ant 1.5.2 after its release. The most significant of these are http://nagoya.apache.org/b

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Dear Mr. Gabor On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Rene Gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Would you have an Ant Manual in pdf that we can download? Thank you very very much for your kindest assistance. Unfortunately there is no PDF version of the Ant manual. Ant's manual is currently creat

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now, I'm sure, too. if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever. Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO dire

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Chris Reeves wrote: Ah - ok. And proof that no matter how tattered the pages of my copy of JDWA are, there's more gems to be found within. Thanks! Chris I believe that particular snippet is a near-direct cut and paste from ant's own build file. So the credit goes to whoever set up the task in

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do we have a real-world candidate for ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types. though in that particular example, it'd be nice if the types were also accessible to the .net tasks, tha

Re: Call for defaults.properties maintanance...

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christoph Wilhelms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed elements should be listed in the defaults.properties Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or utterly, totally deprect

Re: [PATCH] JUnitReport Patch

Andrus Adamchik wrote: I submitted a bug 18504 about JUnitReport being broken on JDK 1.4.1. It was closed with WONTFIX status, which I think happened partially due to Bugzilla mysteriously trimming half of my report text (I am not very experienced with Bugzilla, so who knows). Anyway, the descr

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

- Original Message - From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 08:37 Subject: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations > Hola a todos: > > I'm trying to solve w2k command line length problems for gump. didnt know

VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

I nominate Jesse Stockall as a committer as he likes spending time fixing up and refactoring some of the neglected bits of the optional tasks, and if we commit his new patch to the xdocs stuff, we need somebody to go through all the attributes of all the tasks and add the new metadata :) Also he'

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

I've been doing the thought exercises on what it would take to have forked ant instances coupled to the extent that the child receives all properties & definiitions, and can pump back messages for integration into the parents logging channel. It'd be hard, but interesting -you could do tightly coup

Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

- Original Message - From: "Jesse Stockall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:49 Subject: Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall > On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 01:13 AM, Steve Loughra

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:33 Subject: Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 06:41 Subject: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the > Beta. > > Please indicate your support for this

Re: [PATCH] add regular expression selector (re-worked)

Jay wrote: Here is the new patch to add a regular expression selector as a core task, instead of the one I submitted Wednesday that just updated ContainsSelector. I was thinking I should also do a test case. I have gotten lost trying to find what's needed. I'm sure these questions have been ans

Re: [VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all, Antoine has continuously been sending in patches since months now, he's played an important role in the zip refactoring and is answering more question on the user list than most of us here. Furthermore Antoine has access to a perforce installation, so he's able to tes

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/clearcase CCLock.java CCMkbl.java CCMklabel.java CCMklbtype.java CCRmtype.java CCUnlock.java ClearCase.java

Magesh Umasankar wrote: I am sending a summary of the commit I made because ezmlm-reject said: "fatal: Sorry, I don't accept messages larger than 10 bytes (#5.2.3)" while I trust you etc, etc, this is the trick that would let me sneak a back door into something complex and vulnerable, like say

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/clearcase CCLock.java CCMkbl.java CCMklabel.java CCMklbtype.java CCRmtype.java CCUnlock.java ClearCase.java

- Original Message - From: "Magesh Umasankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 17:35 Subject: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/clearcase CCLock.java CCMkbl.java CCMklabel.java CCMklbtype.java C

Re: DynamicTag

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 22:42 Subject: Re: DynamicTag > The "first place" was a very long time ago and there was a lot of history for > why Ant is the way it is. You might

Re: subant low-profile in ant's manual

Its low profile through laziness. I think its man entry went in throgh a drag-and-drop of the xdocs entry, and nobody bothered with the main index. So go ahead and insert them, if you feel like it. - Original Message - From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers Li

Re: antlib / ruper task

Adam Jack wrote: I am searching for documentation about ruper. I found this http://krysalis.org/cgi-bin/krywiki.pl?Ruper I see that the ruper task depends on common-vfs. If we use Ruper for antlib, which can be very good, then we are making ant core dependent upon common-vfs. I have been working w

Re: antlib / ruper task

Dominique Devienne wrote: Works just fine for the purpose of doing s... We don't require anything fancy here. Getting files thru HTTP with timestamp works for me, and has been for a while. I've even done simple stuff like extracting properties from the HTTP header at the same time I'm getting a fil

Re: antlib

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Hi guys, I would propose to that instead of calling ruper, the rupper people can provide a task (or whatever other name you want) that will do all the finding and downloading and then will invoque . If we do this, then we can concentrate here on the local while some

Re: [PATCH] New resource found

wow, a CD. I am impressed. I'll have to get hold of a copy so that I will have some German literature other than Lucky Luke cartoons that my finite German understanding can cope with :) As an aside, that makes two German books on ant, one slender quick reference and this one (what does the title

Re: [PATCH] New resource found

If I try and discourage you from writing a book, will you take me seriously? dont do it for the money -So far I think my gross earnings have been in the $5000 mark, the US gov has taken their share and now the UK tax return paperwork is trickling in. dont do it for the fun -its fun for the first

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

+1, with couple of questions -I'm unsure about the point that Active PMC members have the binding vote for committers -to date its been open to all committers to have binding votes. Is there a reason for the change? -We dont have anything (formally) about the survey process used to cover Java1.1

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has the persistence required :-) I will start

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 06:52 Subject: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html > Also, DifferentSelector has no Junit test yet, this should be done. I agree, but was struck by incompetence when I tr

Re: AW: Selector tests/DifferentSelector

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Steve, do you mean you have difficulties to understand the existing selector tests. I have had some difficulties there too. I am working on a new Selector (with tests of course) and one point on my todo list is improving the doco about testing selectors. I took a

Re: Advice required on committing

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: should I make a bugzilla entry or just commit the changes, with unit test and appropriate comment ? I almost never create bugzilla entries for bugs I find myself - neither do I for bug reports received

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

Conor MacNeill wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:27 pm, Erik Hatcher wrote: If folks feel strongly about it, I'll revert it. I'm not into strong feelings :-). Let's see what people think. Conor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: if="${foo}" => true if="${nofoo}" =>false I dont know what this would break (except for people who have properties called "true" ), It would break builds of peop

Re: AW: Ant file to create patch file

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 from a non-commiter :-) I miss the statement. I played a little bit: - on my machine the path is stored in ${env.Path} (hh) so I added after the environment-statement - cvs.exe is on my path. But I can´t get the cvs host (firewall blocks that port). So it is

Re: AW: AW: Ant file to create patch file

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -or we configure the build file to take a different host (like localhost) and maybe port, then you can SSH into, say, sourceforge, and tunnel over to apache.org If that would work it would be great. But I don´t think so. Our firewall is very restrictive. AFAIK only the

adding success & failure to

I think I posted this last week, but it got lost 1. What do people think about adding the ability to set properties if a subant or ant call failed/succeeded. This lets me do complex things in cruise control. 2. How best to do it? Here is one example implementation --

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs antnews.xml index.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: conor 2003/06/10 23:19:47 Modified:docs antnews.html index.html page.css xdocsantnews.xml index.xml Log: Put award news on main page cool. two years in a row. That creates pressure we have to sustain. I was somewhat disappointed that E

Re: adding success & failure to

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: This can be achieved with the task from antcontrib. Take a look at it. yes, that was what I was planning to do for now I think it is becoming time for some of this very useful and generic tasks to make its way into CORE. What do people think? What antcontrib people t

Re: FileUtils#createTempFile : what about using java.io.tmpdir as a default there ?

peter reilly wrote: I think java.io.tmpdir is not used because it is not in java 1.1. As Ant does not support 1.1 (except to generated 1.1 classes), use should probably be made of java.io.File#createTempFile(). yes, the tempFile stuff was there for 1.1 support; same with the touch stuff ---

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet ImportTypelib.java JSharp.java

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 20 Jun 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: + * @uthor steve loughran Does xdocs recognize this tag? no - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: "Donations" link

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, would anybody have a problem with a link named "Donations" under "Get Involved" on our homepage that points to ? No. I also think that if anyone is going to get the commission on books related to Apache software, it shou

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note : I observed an error in the date/time returned by java and what I would expect theoretically under Win 2000 and JDK 1.4.1_02 of 16,344,000 (16 millions of milliseconds), slightly more than 4 and a half hours. really? what TZ are you in? Big deltas are usuall

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi Steve, I am in the CET (Central European) Timezone. It has a difference of 1 hour with GMT AFAIK. I have taken this hour of difference already into account. Anyway the point is : trying to set the last modified time of a file to 123456 millis after the epoch does not

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

Martin Gainty wrote: Alright I'll ask the dumb question What happened on Jan 1 1601??? -Martin probably lots of things relevant to the people at the time. Of most interest to clocks is that by that day, the start of the seventeenth century, most of the western world had updated their calendars t

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to kick off a discussion on what needs to be done to get Ant 1.6 to a release. I'm just going to ramble through some random thoughts I have been having in no particular order just to get discussion started. I don't have any fixed timeframe in mind, or anything so

linux test failures

running on redhat 9.0, [SMP] and I'm seeing a regexp failure on Sun's SDK: Testcase: testHandleDollerMatch(org.apache.tools.ant.filters.TokenFilterTest): C aused an ERROR Illegal group reference java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Illegal group reference at java.util.regex.Matcher.appendR

Re: [VOTE] Jan Materne as committer

Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to propose Jan Materne as an Ant committer. I think his contribution in recent months has been quite obvious both on the dev and user lists and also the bug reports. I think he would make a great committer. Here's my +1 to start the ball rolling. +1. welcome --

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

Dominique Devienne wrote: Thanks for the quick answer Conor and Stefan. Glad to head this should be working with Ant CVS. We're using Ant 1.5.3 of course, and are unlikely to switch over to Ant CVS though. I will nonetheless soon make sure Ant CVS is backward compatible with all our builds and cust

Re: test failures of regexp

- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:30 AM Subject: linux test failures running on redhat 9.0, [SMP] and I'm seeing a regexp failure on Sun's SDK: They

Re: OT: More trivia about dates than you ever wanted to know

Bruce Atherton wrote: At 01:05 PM 6/26/2003 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:22 am, Bruce Atherton wrote: > AU Australia 1752-09-02 Hmmm. I don't think the inhabitants at the time made any record of that decision. Quite right. Perhaps you should submit a patch. :-) you ne

[Fwd: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis]

One more breakage. The Foreach task is derived from ant-contrib foreach, used in the absence of in ant.1.5. I could fix it in Axis if there is an easy fix, but since Axis breaking is a symptom, better to do it in Ant. -Original Message- From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: F

Re: Ant Documentation

Andrew Marlow wrote: Hello, The msg below was originally intended for Steve L, another Ant developer, but I have had trouble contacting him so I am now sending this to a wider audience. sorry I have been in crisis, but am glad you are on the main mail list. Apologies. I am trying to improve the

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, PR 21170 showns to rather unrelated problems AFAIU, but I'd like some feedback - especially since Magesh and Conor have been through part of this for PR 4683 already. Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

Conor MacNeill wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:14 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while other specs say that you could do that for the Class-Path attribute in the main section. It seems that JDK 1.4.2 n

Re: [JAKARTA NEWSLETTER DRAFT] News on 'Apache Ant' from May to June, 2003

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Apache Ant Development Team, (http://ant.apache.org/) We are now preparing the 'Jakarta Newsletter Issue 9', news from May to June 2003, which would be published in the middle of July 2003. I added some blurb, but we cound list all our new committers. Whoever wants

Re: [Patch] keep-alive feature

peter reilly wrote: I am thinking of committing the keep-alive feature: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21144 Do any of the ant commiters have a problem with this feature? I am mostly neutral. I can see its value in some cases (install, but think that it may lead to grief down th

Re: [Patch] keep-alive feature

Dominique Devienne wrote: This discussing brings back the still pending issue of having a generic if/unless on all tasks/types to name just an example... failonerror, if/unless, ant:type, and some other attributes most likely, control 'aspects' of the build, that should be dealt with in a single pl

Re: on openvms

Ken Gentle wrote: Guys, if you're willing to introduce a JNI lib for VMS, all the operations you wish to perform are available through VMS System Services, including getting/setting the Logical Names, and, IIRC, launching a DCL interpreter directly, avoiding the need for the DCL wrapper. It's

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: - Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:59 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java is user.dir guaranteed to contain the drive letter

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileU tilsTest.java

vs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java Steve Loughran says on NT you cannot change directory to \\MachineName On Windows 2000 it is not possible either. Here an example (in German for those who understand) C:\>cd \\DJ0X820J\Programme "\\DJ0X820J\Programme&quo

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileU tilsTest.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, i didn´t detect the "cmd"-stuff. AFAIK you can´t 'cd' into such a directory. But you can get files directly from there. exactly. you can mount them, even mount a WebDAV filesystem in WinXP but you cannot make a UNC path a current directory.

Re: From apache-ant-1.5.3-1-src to build ant.jar and optional.jar

Zhang, Min [IT] wrote: Hi, I download apache-ant-1.5.3-1-src.zip and build the jar files from it on both NT and Unix platforms. Compared with the jar files from the binary distributions, the newly built ant.jar does not include org.apache.tools.ant.filters.util.JavaClassHelper class. The optional

Re: Ant Documentation

Andrew Marlow wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Andrew, I must confess I have downloaded your bz2 file but not yet opened it. I am interested by your work, because ant documentation needs to be improved, but my personal inclination would be to perfect the proposal of Erik Hatcher (with xdocs) W

Re: CommonsLoggingListener

Steve Cohen wrote: I made a build of Ant 1.5.3 and we have been using it in my shop for 2 or 3 months now. Now one of my developers would like to use org.apache.tools.ant.listener.CommonsLoggingListener, as mentioned in Erik and Steve's book p. 507. However, although I see the source file in the

Re: Testing of Ant

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: 1. Do you use some kind of testing criterion? In other words, is there some kind of rule describing what should be tested? Examples of such a criterion could be: "every line of code should be executed during testing" or "every method should have at least one test case."

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScannerTest.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Stefan, Maybe using something like findFileCaseInsensitive instead of getCanonicalPath would be better. If we agree that we need to return the exact case on case insensitive filesystems, that is. this seems to be the only solution which preserves the old behavior of D

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant DirectoryScannerTest.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Sorry, I had some disorder in my ant.jar files, here are real results, which are even much better in terms of speed for the new DirectoryScanner (at least for the fileset containing specific includes) : tests done on nagoya (Solaris) NEW VERSION fileset1 : 117 fileset2 6

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21827] - javah doesn't work with java j2sdk1.4.2

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 23 Jul 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Number 8 Does anybody else feel 1.5.4 getting closer? yup :( - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

Conor MacNeill wrote: On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 07:19 pm, peter reilly wrote: What are the issues with import. I think we should write them down and deal with them - it cannot be that difficult.. The difficult ones (manipulation of basebir etc) we should explicitly defer to ant > 1.6. Not difficult but

Re: on openvms

Wannheden, Knut wrote: If I'm not mistaken then a DCL script can only process a maximum of 8 arguments and the call to a DCL script from Java, including the script filename and its arguments, can at the most be 256 characters long. I'm out of OpenVMs business for too long, to know whether you are c

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

Conor MacNeill wrote: On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:50 am, Dominique Devienne wrote: Getting back to your point, where does that leaves us for basedir? I've slept on it :-). I'd vote to go with the current behaviour. i.e. ignore basedir. Import tasks will always import relative to the file containing th

Re: on openvms

Wannheden, Knut wrote: What remains to be done: 1. Add a method Execute#isFailure(int result) or something similar 1.1 Modify to use this method 1.2 Update documentation of 2. Write a RUNANT.COM DCL sript for shell execution 3. Write a ANT.COM (and BUILD.COM) script Task 1. (and 1.1, 1.2) should

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs ExecTa sk.java Execute.java

Wannheden, Knut wrote: Stefan, Thanks for applying the patch so fast! Meanwhile I've been working on adding support for VMS logicals. This is a bit tricky, because a logical can have multiple values and it can also be defined in multiple tables. Additionally the output from SHOW LOGICAL can't jus

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Java.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: antoine 2003/07/28 10:59:28 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Java.java Log: style Revision ChangesPath 1.66 +97 -0 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Java.java Index: Java.java oh, that reminds me: Can I take ou

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >