Adam Jack wrote:
I am searching for documentation about ruper. I found this
http://krysalis.org/cgi-bin/krywiki.pl?Ruper

I see that the ruper task depends on common-vfs. If we use Ruper for

antlib,

which can be very good, then we are making ant core dependent upon
common-vfs.


I have been working with Ruper recently (doing some reworks on it) and the
commons-vfs dependency is not my favourite thing. Ruper uses VFS (IMHO)
because of the many "file system/transports" (from WebDAV to others) --- but
then proceed to use HTTP 99.9999% of the time.  Seems a bit like a
sledgehammer for a walnut...

I am game to attempt to make Ruper switchable, i.e. it'll work over commons
VFS if provided, or simply the HTTP stack inside a JDK.


of course, the http stack built in to java sucks, so we need to serve stuff in the subset of valid http that it supports.



Reply via email to