Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Sorry, I had some disorder in my ant.jar files, here are real results, which are even much better in terms of speed for the new DirectoryScanner (at least for the fileset containing specific includes) :
tests done on nagoya (Solaris)
NEW VERSION fileset1 : 117 fileset2 6813
CVS July 10th 2003 fileset1 : 821 fileset2 : 6694
I like the speedup of the specific case; it would probably more than compensate for the negative impact on the big fileset case. Remember, a big fileset operation is often followed by a big operation -like javac, jar, ftp, so the dir scan time is a smaller percentage of the total task ('cept of course uptodate).
-steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
