RE: Why parser handlers in ProjectHelper2 private?

ust a general comment - protected setters are much more preferrable than protected fields. /Steve. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: ComponentHelper replacement

es to mind. Given the solutions out there I prefer Ant probably because of the working 'primary objective' mentioned above -- however, I do believe that the community dealing with Ant as a library needs to step up a take an assertive role in the future direction of this project.

RE: [ANN] Ant 1.5.2 Released!

Congratulations. One minor quibble - WHATSNEW does not mention any of the significant revisions to the starteam optional tasks, which are in this release. -Original Message- From: Magesh Umasankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:44 AM To: Ant Developers List Su

building optional tasks

way, I doubt it will work since the ant code now uses the new commons-net package names. --- Steve Cohen Sr. Software Engineer Sportvision Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sportvision.com

RE: building optional tasks

tasks Steve Cohen wrote: > > Finally, the Library Dependencies section of > http://ant.apache.org/manual/index.html still states that for the ftp > and telnet tasks, netcomponents.jar must be downloaded from > www.savarese.org/oro/downloads. However, the code of the ant tasks has &g

How do you communicate with an administrator of bugzilla?

ommunicate with an admin. Can someone provide one? Thanks. --- Steve Cohen Sr. Software Engineer Sportvision Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sportvision.com Please note: As a result of the merger of Ignite Sports and Sportvision, my email address h

Can't build from source

I'm trying to build from the latest cvs sources and I get this the following. Can someone explain what is going on? I thought that perhaps an older version of ant was being found in the build process and I made sure that it wasn't, but that did not help matters. [scohen ~/ant]$ ./build.sh -Ddi

RE: Can't build from source

Never mind. Stupid error. Never put ant.jar into lib/optional! -Original Message- From: Steve Cohen Sent: Tue 3/4/2003 10:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:Can't build from source I'm trying to build from the latest cvs sources and I get this the

Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 07:33 Subject: Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant > PMC: can we grant more people access to the sandbox ? Or should we just use > jakarta-common

RE: Ant homepage in konqueror

I use Konqueror sometimes but I don't see the problem you see. Can you describe a little more fully? -Original Message- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/6/2003 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:Ant homepage in konqueror Does anyo

pointer to half-hearted official MS.NET ant-ish tool

heh, microsoft have just released an automated tool to build, test and deploy your .net apps: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=b32497b0-77f7-4831- 9c55-58bf3962163e&DisplayLang=en with description here, in a winzip exe wrapper around what is really a PDF File http://www.m

RE: Ant homepage in konqueror

In Konqueror 3.0.3-14 (Redhat Linux 8.0) I definitely do not see what you are describing. -Original Message- From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/6/2003 6:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:RE: Ant homepage in konqueror Steve Cohen

RE: 1.5.3?

For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use it? Is it the only which is affected, or are things like affected as well? I am trying to decide whether to pull 1.5.2 internally here. I don't think we use mu

RE: 1.5.3?

Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Steve Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who have not been following the traffic on this bug can > someone please have a capsule summary about what breaks when you use > it? Is it the only which is affected, or are things like > affected as wel

RE: 1.5.3?

Well, sure, not everyone. But not anyone? -Original Message- From: Jesse Stockall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:38 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: 1.5.3? On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Steve Cohen wrote: > > I don't understand why

Re: [PATCH] [17471] -projecthelp does not work with -quiet

Well, we need to be sure it needs fixing :) This may sound silly but -projecthelp -verbose is more informative than the default listing, so the quiet listing should be less informative. The issue is how much less informative - Original Message - From: "Loïc Péron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:

Re: 1.5.3?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 09:43 Subject: Re: 1.5.3? > > 1.5.3 seems needed - and ASAP. > > Maybe we should withdrawl the 1.5.2 distribution. It happened to other > projects. > How about calling

task - Bug 14333 - non-English directory listings

. Not all ftp servers use the unix format. Please send me any such instances you may know of. See http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14333 Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sync files with Ant?

- Original Message - From: "Brennan Stehling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 16:17 Subject: sync files with Ant? > I would like to build a sync capability as an Ant feature but I think I > need some pointers with getting s

tests failing

i have been lax on running tests for a while; now I am seeing (on winXP, single CPU) :- Testcase: testCreateWithEmptyFileset(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.JarTest Caused an ERROR null java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Zip.isEmpty(Zip.java:1082) at org.

Re: tests failing

- Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 00:22 Subject: Re: tests failing > On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i have been lax on runnin

Re: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant

- Original Message - From: "Diane Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 08:17 Subject: [GUMP] Test Failure - Ant OK, this is me, I need to set up the build to exclude DotnetTest > [junit] Testcase: testCSC(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.opti

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 14:50 Subject: 1.6 milestones ? > Hi, > > Do we have any plan or idea on when we'll start distributing 1.6 milestone > builds ? > > Tomcat5 is getting stable, and the

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

can we have the patch as diff -u then ? - Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 15:36 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > Pretty please :

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

- Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:41 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > The diff -u is now the latest attachement to the bug. g

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

tch that help. I like the memory stuff, BTW -we do need to fight leakage here. -steve - Original Message - From: "Andrew Goodnough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 07:26 Subject: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement &

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

- Original Message - From: "Andrew Goodnough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:54 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement > This new ant task has no support for running several targets, forking, > child->pare

Re: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement

- Original Message - From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 07:55 Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement > But where does it stop? also supports automatic ordering of the > projects call

Re: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved

- Original Message - From: "Anderson, Rob H - VSCM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 13:04 Subject: RE: sql triggers, stored procedures, packages, format preserved > Steve, My

Re: JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 15:28 Subject: JDK 1.1 support > I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following > > 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would b

subant

meaningful 2. commented out the lines where the default target was actually the name of the current target. I felt that was a bit too much implicit magic; sorry. -Steve ps, xdocs: I see we dont get mail when xdocs goes down:- http://nagoya.apache.org/~rubys/gump/ant-xdocs-proposal.html

Re: JDK 1.1 support

inst me :) > > > > :-) > I was discussing with someone the concept of having bugrep defects against people. bug, latest version: steve used be nice to me, but since last week he has been rude. "WONTFIX" ...

Re: JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 16:53 Subject: Re: JDK 1.1 support > Then let's figure out if we shouldn't drop JDK1.1 now. > > Is there any active committer that uses JDK1.1 ? Are any active committe

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 10:02 Subject: RE: 1.6 milestones ? > > I know few people may like the JDK1.4 approach ( "put everything in > rt.jar"), but I think it would be better to have more flex

Re: 1.6 milestones ?

Jose Alberto is secretly the bastion of declarative programming purity on this mail list, having a prolog background in the past. So if he thinks the conditionals (and I'd lump try/catch) in there, then he may have a point. I myself am mostly happy with conditional targets *and* conditional . But

New J2ME Ant task

emplate follows. Regards - Steve. Antic is a freely available task for packaging J2ME applications. It produces both the Jar and Jad files in a single step. This allows *all* entries to be correclty set in the jad file, including the size of the jar file that is produced. This task It has

Re: New J2ME Ant task

like the new generation emulators from Nokia are better implemented and don't require these non-standard entries - I'll probably remove this a bit further down the line. Regards - Steve. At 16:12 18/03/2003, you wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Steve Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: &g

Re: java 1.1 on linux

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1.5.1 and 1.5: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Bad major version number I thought Magesh had carefully compiled everything with target=1.1 and so on. If this turns out to not work with JDK 1.1, it is another case for

Re: ssh exec task...

the way the wincvs version does. I am having to ftp files back to a unix server to patch right now. one extra caveat: I dont want to have to install cygwin. I just need a URL of an up to date port/build of the core Gnu unix command toolchain. -steve

Re: java 1.1 on linux

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 14:26 Subject: Re: java 1.1 on linux > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:17 am, Costin Manolache wrote: > > > > Ok - last week we had a proposal, discussions o

RE: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

+1 -Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 12:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support Hi, This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and user lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyon

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 23:21 Subject: Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support > > BTW, maintaining support for the widest range of users and OSes for so long > is very hard, my congratulations to all who

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 22:45 Subject: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support > Hi, > > This is to formalize the discussions which have gone on on the dev and user > lists. Please indicate your vote. Everyone i

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

clear 1.6 should depend on JDK 1.2. This should not prevent though JDK 1.2 to be fully used everywhere it's possible. Steve and Costin might as well -1 the move to JDK 1.2 with this kind of thinking. --DD I'm very happy with the move. I just don't think we should use this as

Re: [VOTE] JDK 1.1 support

Christoph Wilhelms wrote: Hi Costin! +1 on your comment ( and a preemptive -1 on changing any public method that uses Hashtables to use Maps - "just because we can" :-). Using Maps in new code or tasks should be fine. Refactoring some of the introspection code - like support for context class

RE: Some library questions for the optional.jar stuff

and it will install the program for you. The starteam-sdk.jar is what you need. I have not tested this version, but I'm reasonably sure it will work. Holler if it doesn't. I don't think you get the starteam-sdk.jar with the windows clients. Steve -Original Message- Fr

Re: [VOTE] Release Plan for Ant 1.5.3

Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to propose this vote for the Ant 1.5.3 release plan: Mon 24-March-2003 I will build Ant 1.5.3 Beta 1 The primary purpose of this release is to correct a few bugs discovered in Ant 1.5.2 after its release. The most significant of these are http://nagoya.apache.org/b

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

n. When in doubt, please consult the online manual. then the source :) -steve

Re: Request for downloadable Ant Manual in pdf Thank you

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am sure we could probably do a PDF build from the xdocs stuff now, I'm sure, too. if we somehow create docbook content via XSLT, velocity, whatever. Why docbook? You could create the XSL:FO dire

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

ed failures'. Its nice to know when these go away, and its nice to know when they fail in a different place or for a different reason from before, but I dont want the build stopping 'cos a test for a known bug is blocking everything. -steve

Re: Artima SuiteRunner Task

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do we have a real-world candidate for ant-contrib's cpptasks, this includes custom tasks and types. though in that particular example, it'd be nice if the types were also accessible to the .net tasks, tha

Re: Call for defaults.properties maintanance...

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Christoph Wilhelms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To solve this topic I'd like to clearify here which of the listed elements should be listed in the defaults.properties Almost all of them are base classes that should not be listed or utterly, totally deprect

Re: [PATCH] JUnitReport Patch

, reopen the bug and attach the patches. -steve

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

- Original Message - From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 08:37 Subject: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations > Hola a todos: > > I'm trying to solve w2k command line length problems for gump. didnt know

VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

he's been a long standing contributor to bits of the project, does all the due diligence on bugzilla and ant-user support, those being the things that matter as much as new code. The quality of the code is Here's my vote: +1 -steve

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

I've been doing the thought exercises on what it would take to have forked ant instances coupled to the extent that the child receives all properties & definiitions, and can pump back messages for integration into the parents logging channel. It'd be hard, but interesting -you could do tightly coup

Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall

- Original Message - From: "Jesse Stockall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:49 Subject: Re: VOTE: new committer: Jesse Stockall > On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 01:13 AM, Steve Loughra

Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations

- Original Message - From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:33 Subject: Re: [Patch] trying solve w2k command line length limitations > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Ignacio J. Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 06:41 Subject: [PMC VOTE] ANt 1.5.3 Release > I am about to build Ant 1.5.3. There are just a few minor changes from the > Beta. > > Please indicate your support for this

Re: [PATCH] add regular expression selector (re-worked)

Jay wrote: Here is the new patch to add a regular expression selector as a core task, instead of the one I submitted Wednesday that just updated ContainsSelector. I was thinking I should also do a test case. I have gotten lost trying to find what's needed. I'm sure these questions have been ans

Re: [VOTE] Antoine Levy-Lambert as committer

;s able to test and fix those tasks. 8-) Finally he's expressed interest in reviving the antlib proposal. I feel it is time to make him a committer and ask you to vote on this. Let me start with my +1 I celebrate new committers; it helps the project to grow and evolve: +1 -steve

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/clearcase CCLock.java CCMkbl.java CCMklabel.java CCMklbtype.java CCRmtype.java CCUnlock.java ClearCase.java

ulnerable, like say xerces or axis. Hide the back door in 100K of changes and it'll take code review to find it. -steve

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/clearcase CCLock.java CCMkbl.java CCMklabel.java CCMklbtype.java CCRmtype.java CCUnlock.java ClearCase.java

one malicious, then to someone planning to write a paper titled 'process failures in open source security' on how they added a back door & how long it took for someone reading the code to find it. But I wont, because so many people do use these things it'd be irresponsible, 'cept maybe for an easter-egg-class of back door. -steve

Re: DynamicTag

- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 22:42 Subject: Re: DynamicTag > The "first place" was a very long time ago and there was a lot of history for > why Ant is the way it is. You might

Re: subant low-profile in ant's manual

Its low profile through laziness. I think its man entry went in throgh a drag-and-drop of the xdocs entry, and nobody bothered with the main index. So go ahead and insert them, if you feel like it. - Original Message - From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers Li

Re: antlib / ruper task

Adam Jack wrote: I am searching for documentation about ruper. I found this http://krysalis.org/cgi-bin/krywiki.pl?Ruper I see that the ruper task depends on common-vfs. If we use Ruper for antlib, which can be very good, then we are making ant core dependent upon common-vfs. I have been working w

Re: antlib / ruper task

Dominique Devienne wrote: Works just fine for the purpose of doing s... We don't require anything fancy here. Getting files thru HTTP with timestamp works for me, and has been for a while. I've even done simple stuff like extracting properties from the HTTP header at the same time I'm getting a fil

Re: antlib

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: Hi guys, I would propose to that instead of calling ruper, the rupper people can provide a task (or whatever other name you want) that will do all the finding and downloading and then will invoque . If we do this, then we can concentrate here on the local while some

Re: [PATCH] New resource found

title translate to BTW?) that could be reasonably thorough. Is there a vast number of Ant users in the +49 country code (and/or Austria, eastern Switzerland and the Sudtirol in Italy)? -steve - Original Message - From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] New resource found

If I try and discourage you from writing a book, will you take me seriously? dont do it for the money -So far I think my gross earnings have been in the $5000 mark, the US gov has taken their share and now the UK tax return paperwork is trickling in. dont do it for the fun -its fun for the first

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

pers, as now we have two mail lists, the users arent always aware of what is going on. Of course if we formalise it, then you have to say 'what is so fundamental to merit a survey', which argues against mentioning the subject at all -steve - Original Message - From: "Conor Ma

Re: [VOTE] Peter Reilly as committer

Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Peter Reilly as an Ant committer. He has submitted a number of patches that advance the Ant core fanctions as well as helping out answering questions on the user list. I think we've all seen that he has the persistence required :-) I will start

Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 06:52 Subject: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes selectors.html > Also, DifferentSelector has no Junit test yet, this should be done. I agree, but was struck by incompetence when I tr

Re: AW: Selector tests/DifferentSelector

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Steve, do you mean you have difficulties to understand the existing selector tests. I have had some difficulties there too. I am working on a new Selector (with tests of course) and one point on my todo list is improving the doco about testing selectors. I took a

Re: Advice required on committing

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: should I make a bugzilla entry or just commit the changes, with unit test and appropriate comment ? I almost never create bugzilla entries for bugs I find myself - neither do I for bug reports received

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

t would reduce the inordinate amount of confusion that if/unless cause people, including me on occasions. You those occasions, the one where a conditional string is evaluating wrongly and it looks write, but it turns out you were ${expanding} the property rather than just naming it. -steve

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit FormatterElement.java JUnitTask.java

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: if="${foo}" => true if="${nofoo}" =>false I dont know what this would break (except for people who have properties called "true" ), It would break builds of peop

Re: AW: Ant file to create patch file

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 from a non-commiter :-) I miss the statement. I played a little bit: - on my machine the path is stored in ${env.Path} (hh) so I added after the environment-statement - cvs.exe is on my path. But I can´t get the cvs host (firewall blocks that port). So it is

Re: AW: AW: Ant file to create patch file

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -or we configure the build file to take a different host (like localhost) and maybe port, then you can SSH into, say, sourceforge, and tunnel over to apache.org If that would work it would be great. But I don´t think so. Our firewall is very restrictive. AFAIK only the

Overridable targets?

be preserved. There is probably some reason why this cannot work but I can't think of it, so I will throw it out to the group for discussion. Have at it! Please, though, not too hard. :-) ------ Steve Cohen Sr. Software Engineer Sportvision In

RE: Overridable targets?

using it to define project dependencies in a hierarchical way! Works Great! Matt -Original Message- From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Overridable targets? Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick aroun

RE: Overridable targets?

Thanks. I knew it was a feasible idea. -Original Message- From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Overridable targets? Steve Cohen wrote, On 06/06/2003 16.54: > Here is a radical idea that I'd

adding success & failure to

I think I posted this last week, but it got lost 1. What do people think about adding the ability to set properties if a subant or ant call failed/succeeded. This lets me do complex things in cruise control. 2. How best to do it? Here is one example implementation --

Re: cvs commit: ant/xdocs antnews.xml index.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: conor 2003/06/10 23:19:47 Modified:docs antnews.html index.html page.css xdocsantnews.xml index.xml Log: Put award news on main page cool. two years in a row. That creates pressure we have to sustain. I was somewhat disappointed that E

Re: adding success & failure to

-steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FileUtils#createTempFile : what about using java.io.tmpdir as a default there ?

peter reilly wrote: I think java.io.tmpdir is not used because it is not in java 1.1. As Ant does not support 1.1 (except to generated 1.1 classes), use should probably be made of java.io.File#createTempFile(). yes, the tempFile stuff was there for 1.1 support; same with the touch stuff ---

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/dotnet ImportTypelib.java JSharp.java

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 20 Jun 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: + * @uthor steve loughran Does xdocs recognize this tag? no - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: "Donations" link

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, would anybody have a problem with a link named "Donations" under "Get Involved" on our homepage that points to ? No. I also think that if anyone is going to get the commission on books related to Apache software, it shou

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note : I observed an error in the date/time returned by java and what I would expect theoretically under Win 2000 and JDK 1.4.1_02 of 16,344,000 (16 millions of milliseconds), slightly more than 4 and a half hours. really? what TZ are you in? Big deltas are usuall

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi Steve, I am in the CET (Central European) Timezone. It has a difference of 1 hour with GMT AFAIK. I have taken this hour of difference already into account. Anyway the point is : trying to set the last modified time of a file to 123456 millis after the epoch does not

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/util FileUtilsTest.java

ypes, not between Java (whose Calendar class is TZ aware) and .NET. -Steve (trivia related to WGS-84 'gps time' and current UTC omitted) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

out, as people have done the code, we just need to commit and test it. Also, I am +1 with Stefan's idea on an ant1.5.4, just for javah. -steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

linux test failures

running on redhat 9.0, [SMP] and I'm seeing a regexp failure on Sun's SDK: Testcase: testHandleDollerMatch(org.apache.tools.ant.filters.TokenFilterTest): C aused an ERROR Illegal group reference java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Illegal group reference at java.util.regex.Matcher.appendR

Re: [VOTE] Jan Materne as committer

Conor MacNeill wrote: I'd like to propose Jan Materne as an Ant committer. I think his contribution in recent months has been quite obvious both on the dev and user lists and also the bug reports. I think he would make a great committer. Here's my +1 to start the ball rolling. +1. welcome --

Re: Ant 1.6 todo thoughts

Dominique Devienne wrote: Thanks for the quick answer Conor and Stefan. Glad to head this should be working with Ant CVS. We're using Ant 1.5.3 of course, and are unlikely to switch over to Ant CVS though. I will nonetheless soon make sure Ant CVS is backward compatible with all our builds and cust

Re: test failures of regexp

- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Loughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 2:30 AM Subject: linux test failures running on redhat 9.0, [SMP] and I'm seeing a regexp failure on Sun's SDK: They

Re: OT: More trivia about dates than you ever wanted to know

Bruce Atherton wrote: At 01:05 PM 6/26/2003 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 06:22 am, Bruce Atherton wrote: > AU Australia 1752-09-02 Hmmm. I don't think the inhabitants at the time made any record of that decision. Quite right. Perhaps you should submit a patch. :-) you ne

[Fwd: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis]

One more breakage. The Foreach task is derived from ant-contrib foreach, used in the absence of in ant.1.5. I could fix it in Axis if there is an easy fix, but since Axis breaking is a symptom, better to do it in Ant. -Original Message- From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: F

Re: Ant Documentation

Andrew Marlow wrote: Hello, The msg below was originally intended for Steve L, another Ant developer, but I have had trouble contacting him so I am now sending this to a wider audience. sorry I have been in crisis, but am glad you are on the main mail list. Apologies. I am trying to improve the

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, PR 21170 showns to rather unrelated problems AFAIU, but I'd like some feedback - especially since Magesh and Conor have been through part of this for PR 4683 already. Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >