Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test
completion on the most troublesome platform (windows))
The beta of
As usual I lack the technological competence to vote on this part, so
I've again concentrated on checking the legal requirements and
infrastructire stuff.
So far I didn't find any issues, which means I'm +1 on the release.
The only stuff flagged by RAT are some JQuery files, the generated
package
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Would love a Solaris, HPUX and MacOSX test)
MacOS X PPC 10.4.11 on JDK 1.5.0 (_13 IIRC) - all tests passed except
for the scriptdef tests whoch shouldn't have been run since I didn't
have BSF around anyway.
Stefan
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As usual I lack the technological competence to vote on this part, so
> I've again concentrated on checking the legal requirements and
> infrastructire stuff.
>
> So far I didn't find any issues, which means I'm +1 on th
Steve Loughran wrote:
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi,
As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
The current 1.7.1 trunk is now locked for further changes (99.9% test
completion on the most troublesome platform (wind
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Loughran wrote:
> > Kevin Jackson wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
> >>
> >> I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
> >>
> >> T
Peter Reilly wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Loughran wrote:
> Kevin Jackson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As I mentioned previously (although I'm a couple of days late).
>>
>> I'd like to release a beta of 1.7.1 within the next two weeks.
>>
hi,
There is an open source project called Parallel Junit
(https://parallel-junit.dev.java.net/). The idea is nice but the
developer has not provided an ant task for using this from an ant build.
Looking at the ant's junit task, it looks like we cannot easily
incorporate this without some chan
hi,
I know that there is already a parallel task. But...
We have a build file which goes something like this:
...
(I have omitted the unnecessary bits for this example)
Consider the scenario where the file transfer takes a long time: would
it be a good idea to have the copy/scp/ft
One thread per file? Hows that going to help for a fileset that selects 50
files? 100? 1000?
Don't get me wrong - to build WebSphere we have many custom tasks that
spawn worker threads. My point is that you have to be smart about how you
build in multthreading support; simply spawning a thread
Yes - I do agree totally with you that it needs to be done intelligently.
What I am trying to inquire about is the existence of the ability which
itself is not present right now. For eg, in my scenario, I know that I
am trying to copy to an ftp server using the scp command, and that there
is n
+1
Looking at integrating this into the next release of Groovy, and this new
build didn't break any tests
Xavier Hanin wrote:
>
> I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2.
> Compared to the first attempt, the only change is that I've applied
> IVY-744
> fix that Gilles has c
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:15:13 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2.
Compared to the first attempt,
FWIW, no failures on MacOS X Intel 10.4.11 on JDK
1.5.0_13
-Matt
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Kevin Jackson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (Would love a Solaris, HPUX and MacOSX test)
>
> MacOS X PPC 10.4.11 on JDK 1.5.0 (_13 IIRC) - all
> tests pass
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The bin-with-deps distribution contains an ant-1.6.jar. Which x of
>> 1.6.x is this? Why not 1.7.0? Is this an unmodified version of
>> Ant's jar (I don't
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Vijay Aravamudhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider the scenario where the file transfer takes a long time:
> would it be a good idea to have the copy/scp/ftp tasks create
> different threads for each file?
There is no built-in support for anything like this in Ant, no.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Vijay Aravamudhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my suggestion/request: could you please provide a new
> attribute suiteClass' where the user can then specify the class to
> be instantiated for the implementation of the junit TestSuite? This
> could default to the default
> > Consider the scenario where the file transfer takes a long time:
> > would it be a good idea to have the copy/scp/ftp tasks create
> > different threads for each file?
>
> There is no built-in support for anything like this in Ant, no.
>
> I could imagine that we'd add a patch that enabled op
$ svn info
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/branches/ANT_17_BRANCH
Revision: 631491
$ java -version
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0-C)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.3.0-C, mixed mode)
Windows XP SP2 32bit (German)
$build d
19 matches
Mail list logo
