On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Vijay Aravamudhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's my suggestion/request: could you please provide a new > attribute suiteClass' where the user can then specify the class to > be instantiated for the implementation of the junit TestSuite? This > could default to the default TestSuite class from junit if not > specified. > > If there is a different way to accomplish this with the current > release of ant - please reply.
Ant will only use TestSuite if it is not running JUnit4 and the test class doesn't have a static suite() method. So one way to accomplish it would be to provide a suite() of your own - and probably stop using batchtest completely. Given that we wrap the individual test classes in a JUnit4TestAdapter the pluggable TestSuite wouldn't help with JUnit4. IIRC we've had a few bug reports against our reporting infrastructure by people who ran several tests in parallel that we addressed, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were still some issues with specific test listeners. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
