svn commit: r572565 - /ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/conditions/antversion.xml

2007-09-04 Thread peterreilly
Author: peterreilly Date: Tue Sep 4 00:51:08 2007 New Revision: 572565 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572565&view=rev Log: opps Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/conditions/antversion.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/conditions/antversion.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dotnet-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2007-09-04 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dotnet-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

2007-09-04 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36955] - Path reference in a target, which is not executed, is set anyway.

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36955] - Path reference in a target, which is not executed, is set anyway.

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36955] - Path reference in a target, which is not executed, is set anyway.

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43301] New: - [Patch] Note about java.lang.OutOfMemoryError in junit

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43301] - [Patch] Note about java.lang.OutOfMemoryError in junit

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43004] - OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in .

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36955] - Path reference in a target, which is not executed, is set anyway.

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r572616 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Touch.java

2007-09-04 Thread peterreilly
Author: peterreilly Date: Tue Sep 4 04:06:15 2007 New Revision: 572616 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572616&view=rev Log: checkstyle Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Touch.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Touch.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2007-09-04 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

2007-09-04 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40678] - [Patch] Allow macrodef to have arbitary xml elements

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36955] - Path reference in a target, which is not executed, is set anyway.

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40678] - [Patch] Allow macrodef to have arbitary xml elements

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40678] - [Patch] Allow macrodef to have arbitary xml elements

2007-09-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Thanks for the warm welcome!

2007-09-04 Thread Magesh Umasankar
All: Thank you for welcoming back into the ant-dev community. Cheers, Magesh - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

2007-09-04 Thread Curt Arnold
Ant-contrib-test has been started failing on Gump sometime between 2007-08-21T00:00 and 2007-08-22T00L:00 (I believe Pacific DT, but could be wrong) with the following test failures: run-test: [junit] Testsuite: net.sf.antcontrib.design.VerifyDesignTest [junit] Tests run: 41, Failures

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

2007-09-04 Thread Matt Benson
Thanks for the note. One or more of us will be looking into it. :) -Matt --- Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ant-contrib-test has been started failing on Gump > sometime between > 2007-08-21T00:00 and 2007-08-22T00L:00 (I believe > Pacific DT, but > could be wrong) with the follow

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

2007-09-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The offending rev does deal with Introspection and seems that it > could interfere with proper initialization of tasks, but I don't see > any obvious error in the patch. It doesn't have a related bug > report, so I don't know what it is

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

2007-09-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Equals now has changed the signature of the setters to take Object > arguments (rev 557097) so setArg1 in IsGreateThan no longer > overrides the one in Equals. I see the String setters haven't been removed. In order to have subclas

Re: Rev 568096 breaks ant-contrib

2007-09-04 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The offending rev does deal with Introspection and > seems that it > > could interfere with proper initialization of > tasks, but I don't see > > any obvious error in the patch. It