DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23960] New: - add catalog resolver to

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs external.html

2003-10-21 Thread jhm
jhm 2003/10/20 22:38:36 Modified:xdocsexternal.xml docs external.html Log: New external Task PRes. Revision ChangesPath 1.104 +24 -0 ant/xdocs/external.xml Index: external.xml ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nighlty build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nighlty build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23966] New: - PropertyHelper: wrong parameters passed to setPropertyHook

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23942] - Addition of a local property

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Usage of deprecated methods in 1.6 CORE

2003-10-21 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
Hi all, Taking a look around the code, I just notice that in several (many) places in the CORE code we are still calling deprecated methods. That looks like quite cheeky to me ;-) If we say that those methods should not be used, we should be the first ones not using them. If it turns out that the

AW: Usage of deprecated methods in 1.6 CORE

2003-10-21 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi Jose, you are right, it is not a good example to be using deprecated methods. However, this is not a boiling problem. I would rather fix this in 1.7 (but that is just me). And also go further in the effort concerning style (checkstyle). And also move to xdocs for the documentation, And also vent

RE: Usage of deprecated methods in 1.6 CORE

2003-10-21 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
That is fine. One of the things that made me jump into it is that if you look at the deprecated messages they say to use instead blah, but it is difficult to figure out what it is meant by blah. We should indicate better which and how to use the replacement methods, it is really not clear and that

Re: AW: Usage of deprecated methods in 1.6 CORE

2003-10-21 Thread peter reilly
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:32, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hi Jose, > you are right, it is not a good example to be using deprecated methods. > However, this is not a boiling problem. > I would rather fix this in 1.7 (but that is just me). > And also go further in the effort concerning style (

Re obsolete xml-apis.jar in ant1.6 [was ant1.6beta2]

2003-10-21 Thread Shane Curcuru
Dear Antites: Yes, the xml-commons team is working on getting an official relase of our external component, xml-apis.jar, which would be suitable for using in your 1.6 release. (big thanks to Stefan for kicking me awake on this) However, there are a number of issues including getting TCK compli

Re: obsolete xml-apis.jar in ant1.6 [was ant1.6beta2]

2003-10-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the xml-commons team is working on getting an official relase of our > external component, xml-apis.jar, which would be suitable for using > in your 1.6 release. Good news 8-) > Could someone send me directly (I'm not on [EMAIL PROT

Re: Re obsolete xml-apis.jar in ant1.6 [was ant1.6beta2]

2003-10-21 Thread Torsten Curdt
Shane Curcuru wrote: Dear Antites: Yes, the xml-commons team is working on getting an official relase of our external component, xml-apis.jar, which would be suitable for using in your 1.6 release. (big thanks to Stefan for kicking me awake on this) So we Cocoon'ers are not at alone having troub

Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-21 Thread peter reilly
Hi all, I would like to put the local property patch into ant 1.6. Normally I would wait for 1.7 for this, but it has a big and (I think) beneficial impact on . The changes to macrodef are not Backward Compatible with the current implementation. The task declares properties that only exist for

Misleading error reporting with s

2003-10-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
Before opening a BugZilla issue, I'll post what I'm seing: I have a 'recursing' build file (build.xml), that imports recurse.xml to do the actual recursing (build.xml just specify which subdirs to recurse into), and the build file I'm recursing into (rescue.xml) fails to parse correctly for good r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23960] - add catalog resolver to

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-21 Thread Steve Loughran
peter reilly wrote: Hi all, I would like to put the local property patch into ant 1.6. I am 0 on this; my sole concern being with no RCs planned from now to 1.6 shipping, we dont have the beta testing scheduled to find details. Normally I would wait for 1.7 for this, but it has a big and (I think

Cannot use antlib:... with CppTasks!?!?!

2003-10-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
I'm a little baffled... I've added an antlib.xml to CppTasks.jar, which is in ant/lib (as is AntContrib.jar). I've declared the xmlns:cpp="antlib:net.nf.antcontrib.cpptasks" shortcut on the top-level element, and still it cannot find the datatype. I originally used the cc namespace prefix instea

Re: Cannot use antlib:... with CppTasks!?!?!

2003-10-21 Thread peter reilly
Its a typeo. On Tuesday 21 October 2003 17:54, Dominique Devienne wrote: > I'm a little baffled... I've added an antlib.xml to CppTasks.jar, which is > in ant/lib (as is AntContrib.jar). I've declared the > xmlns:cpp="antlib:net.nf.antcontrib.cpptasks" shortcut on the ^^ should be antlib:net.sf.a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23979] New: - FileSet: attribute is include, not includes

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23981] New: - Perforce tasks handle 'force' option oddly

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Cannot use antlib:... with CppTasks!?!?!

2003-10-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
I've turn around the pb for now by using the good old tasks/types properties resource, setting the URI explicitly: I've also figured out that my antlib.xml is also not working with Ant-Contrib, as I thought it did (I use the same work around). I'm missing something here. Any help would

RE: Cannot use antlib:... with CppTasks!?!?!

2003-10-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Its a typeo. > > On Tuesday 21 October 2003 17:54, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > I'm a little baffled... I've added an antlib.xml to CppTasks.jar, which > is > > in ant/lib (as is AntContrib.jar). I've declared the > > xmlns:cpp="antlib:net.nf.an

AW: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-21 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
I am +1 on this. The fact that some of the changes in the patches are not backward compatible would be a problem for inclusion in ant 1.7 Cheers, Antoine -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 17:36 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23979] - FileSet: attribute is include, not includes

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23981] - Perforce tasks handle 'force' option oddly

2003-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Vote: for 1.6

2003-10-21 Thread Shatzer, Larry
Since I am not a commiter, my vote won't count, but I am +1 for this. It solves my original problem perfectly. -- Larry > -Original Message- > From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 8:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Vote: for 1.6 > > > H

Re: Usage of deprecated methods in 1.6 CORE

2003-10-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 12:17 am, peter reilly wrote: > On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:32, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > Hi Jose, > > you are right, it is not a good example to be using deprecated methods. > > However, this is not a boiling problem. > > I would rather fix this in 1.7 (but that is just