On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:32, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Hi Jose, > you are right, it is not a good example to be using deprecated methods. > However, this is not a boiling problem. > I would rather fix this in 1.7 (but that is just me). > And also go further in the effort concerning style (checkstyle).
I would like to see one last push to get non code changing style changes done before 1.6 is complete - missing java doc and whitespace, bracket placement. Doing this now would mean that any 1.7 changes will be "real" changes and not just style changes. Peter > And also move to xdocs for the documentation, > And also venture into virtual file systems, > and ... > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 13:14 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Usage of deprecated methods in 1.6 CORE > > > Hi all, > > Taking a look around the code, I just notice that in several (many) > places > in the CORE code we are still calling deprecated methods. That looks > like > quite cheeky to me ;-) > > If we say that those methods should not be used, we should be the first > ones > not using them. If it turns out that the only efficient or neat way to > write that code by using the deprecated method, them we should > reevaluate > our stand and un-deprecate it. > > I have seen usage of deprecated stuff in Ant.java (which seems to me > should be fixed) > and in Property.java (where the picture is much more murky). I am sure > there are more. > > Jose Alberto > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
