-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Benson wrote:
> Dangerous and/or just kind of weird. :) I can check
> whether the launcher classes are used. Even if this
> is the case, however, ant-core uses launcher classes
> and doesn't duplicate them in the jar. ant.jar
> requires ant-la
TED]>
> > To: Ant Developers List
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
> > Subject: nodeps jar
> >
> >
> > I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this
> jar. Do they really need to be?
> >
> >
> I do not have a clue. I supp
Matt Benson wrote:
> Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds about (2)? Going once...
>
> -Matt
>
> - Original Message
> From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ant Developers List
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
> Subject: nod
Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds about (2)? Going once...
-Matt
- Original Message
From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM
Subject: nodeps jar
I'm curious why the launcher classes are in th
I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this jar. Do they really need to
be?
Additionally, any arguments against "moving" (while retaining API BC) some of
the always-available "optional" tasks e.g. echoproperties to oata.taskdefs?
-Matt
--
