Matt Benson wrote: > Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds about (2)? Going once... > > -Matt > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM > Subject: nodeps jar > > > I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this jar. Do they really need to > be? > > I do not have a clue. I suppose you mean this is a potentially dangerous duplication ? May be the launcher classes are called from some of the optional nodeps tasks. > Additionally, any arguments against "moving" (while retaining API BC) some of > the always-available "optional" tasks e.g. echoproperties to oata.taskdefs? > > I do not have any objections regarding echoproperties. propertyfile would then be a similar case ? > -Matt > > > > Regards,
Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
