--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > Hmm... nobody knows about (1) and nobody minds > about (2)? Going once... > > > > -Matt > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org> > > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:00:27 PM > > Subject: nodeps jar > > > > > > I'm curious why the launcher classes are in this > jar. Do they really need to be? > > > > > I do not have a clue. I suppose you mean this is a > potentially dangerous > duplication ? May be the launcher classes are called > from some of the > optional nodeps tasks.
Dangerous and/or just kind of weird. :) I can check whether the launcher classes are used. Even if this is the case, however, ant-core uses launcher classes and doesn't duplicate them in the jar. ant.jar requires ant-launcher.jar, so I don't see why ant-nodeps.jar shouldn't do the same. > > Additionally, any arguments against "moving" > (while retaining API BC) some of the > always-available "optional" tasks e.g. > echoproperties to oata.taskdefs? > > > > > I do not have any objections regarding > echoproperties. propertyfile > would then be a similar case ? Exactly. > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Antoine > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
