> > how about an ant sandbox?
>
> +1
>
> IMHO we should move the whole proposal area there, this would also
> make our CVS snapshots smaller.
+1 - probaly this will thighten the dayly builds, too :)
Greetinx,
Chris
At 08:31 AM 3/7/2003 +0100, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how about an ant sandbox?
IMHO we should move the whole proposal area there, this would also
make our CVS snapshots smaller.
+1 to both these ideas.
In the best traditions of virtuously
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how about an ant sandbox?
+1
IMHO we should move the whole proposal area there, this would also
make our CVS snapshots smaller.
Stefan
On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
how about an ant sandbox?
+1
Hello,
Steve Loughran wrote:
jakarta-commons-sandbox, which is already available to most people, and
take it from there when it is ready ? The second solution requires the
least effort, that's what I would preffer :-)
how about an ant sandbox?
Sounds good. Some of the projects in the proposal ar
- Original Message -
From: "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 07:33
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Krysalis Centipede, Ruper, Version to Ant
> PMC: can we grant more people access to the sandbox ? Or sho
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote, On 06/03/2003 9.49:
> ...
>>> If you think this plan is workable let's put this to a PMC vote.
>>
>> Yes, let's start with Ruper, and work our way one thing at a time.
>
> Oh, one more thing.
>
> Krysalis Version is active in our sandbox,
Christoph Wilhelms wrote, On 06/03/2003 9.57:
At this stage, I think it is appropriate for us to look at
Ruper. Centipede is, at this stage, something to layer on
top of Ant and should remain separate, IMHO.
I agree that Centipede should remain separate and remain on
top of Ant.
I also think tha
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote, On 06/03/2003 9.49:
...
If you think this plan is workable let's put this to a PMC vote.
Yes, let's start with Ruper, and work our way one thing at a time.
Oh, one more thing.
Krysalis Version is active in our sandbox, and is an effort to get a
versioning system, that wou
> > At this stage, I think it is appropriate for us to look at
> > Ruper. Centipede is, at this stage, something to layer on
> > top of Ant and should remain separate, IMHO.
>
> I agree that Centipede should remain separate and remain on
> top of Ant.
> I also think that Centiepde can become an
Conor MacNeill wrote, On 06/03/2003 4.54:
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:15 am, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
- krysalis-centipede (the distro) \
- krysalis-cents (the antlibs) > Centipede
- krysalis-ant-tasks (the tasks)/
- krysalis-ruper (the downloader)
- krysalis-version (versioning c
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:15 am, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> - krysalis-centipede (the distro) \
> - krysalis-cents (the antlibs) > Centipede
> - krysalis-ant-tasks (the tasks)/
>
> - krysalis-ruper (the downloader)
> - krysalis-version (versioning code)
>
> We have some c
12 matches
Mail list logo
