> > At this stage, I think it is appropriate for us to look at > > Ruper. Centipede is, at this stage, something to layer on > > top of Ant and should remain separate, IMHO. > > I agree that Centipede should remain separate and remain on > top of Ant. > I also think that Centiepde can become an Ant subproject in it's own > right, with committers that have access only to the eventual > "ant-centiepde" module.
I support this idea! I see Centipede on the same level as Antidote! Supprojects additionally do not have anything to do with the Ant releases or release schedule and bugs/issues! Probably Centipede has to be incubated before ;). Should Ruper become a subproject, too? Gump should - IMHO - become an Ant SUBProject, too (Jakarta -> Ant) Thoughs? Greetings, Christoph
