On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sent on Monday. Any good Stefan?
Sorry for the lack of response. I've seen it but haven't had the time
to look at it yet, sorry.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2003 19:46
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Aston
> Sent: 28 September 2003 15:49
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> Patch and new file attached f
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > and would they like
This syntax seems better to me.
> > > Patch and new file attached for consideration.
I suspect that the listserv dropped both.
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 September 2003 18:23
> To: Philip Aston
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > and would they like
> > >
> > > I'd like to see it, at least.
> > >
> >
> > OK, I'll cut a patch at the weekend.
>
> Patch and new file attached for consideration. Examp
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Aston
> Sent: 25 September 2003 22:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is there planned support for this already?
Not exactly for forking each . What has been asked for
(but never implemented) is forking exactly one VM for all tests.
> 2. If not, who maintains the JUnit task,
All Ant co
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:
> I finally got fed up with the cost of forking a new process for every test
> (~1 second in my environment). I've hacked to support a new type
> of where where all of the tests are executed in a single
> sub-process. *Much* faster.
>
> I'm quite willing
[Initially sent to user@ant.apache.org, resent to a more appropriate
place].
Hi,
I finally got fed up with the cost of forking a new process for every test
(~1 second in my environment). I've hacked to support a new type
of where where all of the tests are executed in a single
sub-process. *M
12 matches
Mail list logo