On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > and would they like <batchtest fork="single"/>
This syntax seems better to me. > > > Patch and new file attached for consideration. I suspect that the listserv dropped both. > > > Example usage: > > > <junit fork="true"> > > > <batchtest singleProcess="false"> This syntax is less clear -- but I suppose that you didn't want to hassle with changing setFork to accept any of a list of choices? > Yes, a list of the tests is passed to the forked process through > a temporary file. And so all must share the same test options? -- Jim Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +44 117 982 0786 mobile +44 797 373 7881 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
