On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:

> I finally got fed up with the cost of forking a new process for every test
> (~1 second in my environment). I've hacked <junit/> to support a new type
> of <batchtest/> where where all of the tests are executed in a single
> sub-process. *Much* faster.
>
> I'm quite willing to clean this up and submit it as a patch; but first
> I have some questions:
>
>       1. Is there planned support for this already?
>
>       2. If not, who maintains the JUnit task, and would they like
>          <batchtest fork="single"/>
>
>       3. If they would, which version of ANT should I base the patch on?

How is this different from just specifying fork="no"?

If you have more than one batchtest, does each set get forked
separately?

--
Jim Dixon  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   tel +44 117 982 0786  mobile +44 797 373 7881


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to