I started a new organisation on GitHub, antlibs. Currently antlibs contain
2 repos, ant-contrib and ant-http. Please let me know if you would like to
join.
Currently, I would appreciate some help with IfTaskTest in ant-contrib
which passes with Ant + Junit but fails with Maven + Surefire
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
> Some years ago there were a discussion about having ant-contrib a part of
> Ant.
> Result was that it wasn't possible due IP (and therefore legal) reasons.
>
> Having a look at the tasklist [1] there
Thanks for the comment. IMHO, if there ever would be an Ant Contrib 2.0, it
should contain at least
antcallback
antfetch
for
if (I see use cases where xmlns:if is more cumbersome :-)
outofdate
switch
trycatch/throw
switch
stopwatch (for those who like adding timers in the script rather than using
Some years ago there were a discussion about having ant-contrib a part of Ant.
Result was that it wasn't possible due IP (and therefore legal) reasons.
Having a look at the tasklist [1] there are some I would use:
* antcallback: maybe enhance
* antfetch: maybe (same base idea as antcal
Jan was having a problem with JaCoCo last week because of multiple copies
of ASM library on the classpath because he was building both Ant and Ivy in
the same workspace. He mentioned making some checks on the contents of the
classpath. I thought it was appropriate to remind of a solution that was
p
Sorry for not being clear about my intentions.
I made some changes already (SAX → SAX2, which makes ant contrib work
without having an ancient Xerces around). Would that be sufficient for 1.1
release?
Next, it needs pruning (anybody needs an Ivy 1 wrapper? or httpclient 3
wrapper? is local a
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis <
g.grigelio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
> P.S. While we're at it, in the light of the latest ASM debacle, I'm
> interested in improving Ant classloader task
[...]
Which ASM issue(s) are you referring to? Is there a link to some
discussions
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote:
> I noticed that Ivy has Ant Contrib as a dependency. It's a project
> that has been asleep for a decade, and it shows. So I decided to
> revive it, and the result is here:
> https://github.com/twogee/ant-contrib
Whe
I noticed that Ivy has Ant Contrib as a dependency. It's a project that has
been asleep for a decade, and it shows. So I decided to revive it, and the
result is here: https://github.com/twogee/ant-contrib
The question is, of course, is this sufficient for a 1.1 release? The next
step would
-or make a new beta release with the original behaviour.
Regards,
Erik-Berndt
Van: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vr 18-7-2008 17:33
Aan: dev@ant.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: Ivy svn breaks ant-contrib svn
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Xavier Han
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't really have an opinion on the particular change but am a
>> strong proponent of not breaking APIs in general (at least not
>> without a deprecatio
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a wild guess, but maybe you could use IvyAntSettings again
> (like your original code was),
I thought so myself and had a quick look, but I'm neither familiar
enough with Ivy nor what the ant-contrib task is tr
meframe between beta-1 and beta-2.
>
> Erik-Berndt
>
>
>
> Van: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: do 17-7-2008 11:45
> Aan: Ant Developers List
> Onderwerp: [SPAM] Re: Ivy svn breaks ant-contrib svn
>
>
>
> Just a wild guess, but maybe y
M] Re: Ivy svn breaks ant-contrib svn
Just a wild guess, but maybe you could use IvyAntSettings again (like your
original code was), but instead of calling the execute method you can register
it yourself as Reference in the Project, something like:
IvyAntSettings settings = new IvyAntSet
().addReference(settingsId, settings);
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:13:10 PM
Subject: Re: Ivy svn breaks ant-contrib svn
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
compatibility with a beta version (which
in Ivy language is not a release candidate) sounds not like a good idea to
me. But once again I'm alone to decide, and if more people think it makes
sense, I won't object.
> Right now ant-contrib doesn't have anything but beta2 to build
&
x27;m glad it did. I don't really have an opinion on the particular
change but am a strong proponent of not breaking APIs in general (at
least not without a deprecation period).
Right now ant-contrib doesn't have anything but beta2 to build
against, so it must use setId. Once the next Iv
Jul 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ant-contrib also invokes setId() on the task, which works
Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ant-contrib also invokes setId() on the task, which works fine with
> > > > Ivy 2.0.0beta2 but fails with trunk.
> > > >
> > > > Could you please re-add the setid method?
>
hould use the IvyConfigure task instead.
> > > >
> > > > OK, thanks. Looked straight forward so I just committed the
> > > > necessary patch.
> > >
> > > Ant-contrib also invokes setId() on the task, which works fine with
> > > Ivy 2.0.0beta2 but fai
ne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> I changed that recently. IvyAntSettings is now a DataType again...
> > >> They should use the IvyConfigure task instead.
> > >
> > > OK, thanks. Looked straight forward so I just committed the
> >
ow a DataType again...
> >> They should use the IvyConfigure task instead.
> >
> > OK, thanks. Looked straight forward so I just committed the
> > necessary patch.
>
> Ant-contrib also invokes setId() on the task, which works fine with
> Ivy 2.0.0beta2 but fa
ked straight forward so I just committed the
> necessary patch.
Ant-contrib also invokes setId() on the task, which works fine with
Ivy 2.0.0beta2 but fails with trunk.
Could you please re-add the setid method?
Thanks
Stefan
---
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed that recently. IvyAntSettings is now a DataType again...
> They should use the IvyConfigure task instead.
OK, thanks. Looked straight forward so I just committed the necessary
patch.
Stefan
--
ks ant-contrib svn
Hi,
just a quick note from Gump
<http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-contrib/ant-contrib/gump_work/build_ant-contrib_ant-contrib.html>
Since I'm not familiar enough with either Ivy or ant-contrib's usage
of it, I can't say who's wrong. It looks as if an
Hi,
just a quick note from Gump
<http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-contrib/ant-contrib/gump_work/build_ant-contrib_ant-contrib.html>
Since I'm not familiar enough with either Ivy or ant-contrib's usage
of it, I can't say who's wrong. It looks as if ant-contrib
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Stefan Bodewig
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Instead of what we have in Equals it should
> probably be
> >
> > public void setArg1(Object a) {
> > if (a instanceof String) {
> > setArg1((String) a);
> > }
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead of what we have in Equals it should probably be
>
> public void setArg1(Object a) {
> if (a instanceof String) {
> setArg1((String) a);
> } else {
> somePrivateArg1Setter(a);
> }
> }
>
> public v
On Sep 5, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Peter Reilly wrote:
On 9/5/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
Great diagnosis, Stefan. I will revert the changes to
tomorrow. Does anyone object to a new
task?
we can change to compare objects, just bind it to the new
ObjectsE
On 9/5/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
>
> > Great diagnosis, Stefan. I will revert the changes to
> > tomorrow. Does anyone object to a new
> > task?
>
> we can change to compare objects, just bind it to the new
> ObjectsEqual condition...
>
No we cannot!
I
Matt Benson wrote:
Great diagnosis, Stefan. I will revert the changes to
tomorrow. Does anyone object to a new
task?
we can change to compare objects, just bind it to the new
ObjectsEqual condition...
-
To unsubscribe,
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > The offending rev does deal with Introspection and
> seems that it
> > could interfere with proper initialization of
> tasks, but I don't see
> > any obvious error in the patch. It
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Equals now has changed the signature of the setters to take Object
> arguments (rev 557097) so setArg1 in IsGreateThan no longer
> overrides the one in Equals.
I see the String setters haven't been removed. In order to have
subclas
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The offending rev does deal with Introspection and seems that it
> could interfere with proper initialization of tasks, but I don't see
> any obvious error in the patch. It doesn't have a related bug
> report, so I don't know what it is
Thanks for the note. One or more of us will be
looking into it. :)
-Matt
--- Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ant-contrib-test has been started failing on Gump
> sometime between
> 2007-08-21T00:00 and 2007-08-22T00L:00 (I believe
> Pacific DT, but
> cou
Ant-contrib-test has been started failing on Gump sometime between
2007-08-21T00:00 and 2007-08-22T00L:00 (I believe Pacific DT, but
could be wrong) with the following test failures:
run-test:
[junit] Testsuite: net.sf.antcontrib.design.VerifyDesignTest
[junit] Tests run: 41
es:
...
Thanks to both of you! Gump is happy with ant-contrib-test now.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( taskName );
> 208 newProject.addTaskDefinition(
> taskName, taskClass );
> 209 }
>
> easy fix would be to remove the constructor from
> PropertyHelperTask.
> the project attribute would be injected as usual by
> IH.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 8/
> --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > see
> >
> <http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-test/gump_work/build_ant-contrib_ant-contrib-test.html>
> >
> > Apparently AntCallBack's test tries
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> see
>
<http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-test/gump_work/build_ant-contrib_ant-contrib-test.html>
>
> Apparently AntCallBack's test tries to install a
> PropertyHelper (I&#
Hi,
see
<http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/ant-contrib/ant-contrib-test/gump_work/build_ant-contrib_ant-contrib-test.html>
Apparently AntCallBack's test tries to install a PropertyHelper (I'm
not familiar with either the task's nor the test's code, just pointing
o
On 10/6/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I know this is the wrong maillist, but I also know people on ant-dev
>> are on ant-contrib.
>
> ant-contrib has
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know this is the wrong maillist, but I also know people on ant-dev
are on ant-contrib.
ant-contrib has moved to svn and a few changes have been committed and
most ant-contrib committers are probab
On 10/5/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know this is the wrong maillist, but I also know people on ant-dev are
on ant-contrib.
Question: who broke my build by requiring ivy on the classpath of my
gump run?
That would be Matt Inger ->
http://svn.sourceforge.net/v
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this is the wrong maillist, but I also know people on ant-dev
> are on ant-contrib.
ant-contrib has moved to svn and a few changes have been committed and
most ant-contrib committers are probably not aware of
I know this is the wrong maillist, but I also know people on ant-dev are
on ant-contrib.
Question: who broke my build by requiring ivy on the classpath of my
gump run?
http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/antbook/antbook-diary-core/gump_work/build_antbook_antbook-diary-core.html
That is simultaneously one of the coolest, and more thoroughly pointless
things I've ever seen.
I love it!
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
I simply must share that
http://jonaquino.blogspot.com/2005/02/fir
I simply must share that
http://jonaquino.blogspot.com/2005/02/first-video-game-written-in-ant.html
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know which list this came from so I am replying to this
cross-post. PLEASE DO NOT reply to everyone. Instead just reply to the
ant-contrib list if you have more questions.
I fixed the issue with compilewithwalls not being compatible with 1.3.
You can build from source until
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I have filed bugs on antcontrib's site)
Cross-posting to the dev list may have been more efficient. I for one
don't use SF's bug tracking system at all and only look over the
reports there once every few weeks.
> If there
Hi,
I have found a couple of issues with ANT-Contrib.
I know, it is a separate project, but I thought people
here should be aware of it. (I have filed bugs on antcontrib's site)
1) The compile with walls task, only works in JDK1.4. Even worst,
you can only compile ANTContrib with JDK1.4. Th
ing to represent the backslash character.
> > So, you should probably have 8 backslashes.
> >
> >
> > Matthew Inger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Software Developer
> > Synygy, Inc
> > 610-664-7433 x 7770
> > "Man who jump off cliff, leap to
/testcases/org/apache/ant/contrib
Case.java
Log:
Remove obsolete proposal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remove this silly restriction of requiring a base dir for all files in the
> filelist! --DD
>
> -Original Message-
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 4:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ant-contrib-developers] 1.5.1
]
Subject: Re: [Ant-contrib-developers] 1.5.1 Compatible version
Yikes!
sorry about the output for each file, some debug printfs got thru.
As regard deleteing of the targets.
With the current implemention one may do something like this
55 matches
Mail list logo
