Re: thinking about new releases

Thanks on second thought I'd prefer to decouple the two releases (ant and AntUnit) and will prepare RCs for them independently. Stefan On 2018-06-18, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > Me too. > Gintas > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 11:19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> I am willing to test and vote on an An

Re: thinking about new releases

Me too. Gintas On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 11:19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > I am willing to test and vote on an AntUnit release. > > -Jaikiran > > > On 18/06/18 12:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with > > a released version of it and p

Re: thinking about new releases

I am willing to test and vote on an AntUnit release. -Jaikiran On 18/06/18 12:45 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the coming days. The alternative would be to cut

Re: thinking about new releases

OK, then I'll revert the antunit change so the source release ships with a released version of it and prepare release candidates sometime the coming days. The alternative would be to cut an AntUnit release first which also works for me if enough people are willing to vote on that. Stefan ---

Re: thinking about new releases

+1. I don't have anything in a state that I can push to either of these branches, in the immediate future. -Jaikiran On 16/06/18 9:38 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant 1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might be

Re: thinking about new releases

Den lör 16 juni 2018 kl 18:08 skrev Stefan Bodewig : > Hi all > > given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant > 1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might be a good idea to > actually release 1.9.12 :-) > > AFAICS there is no unfinished work in either branch, bu

thinking about new releases

Hi all given https://dev.snyk.io/research/zip-slip-vulnerability lists Ant 1.9.12 as a release fixing a security problem it might be a good idea to actually release 1.9.12 :-) AFAICS there is no unfinished work in either branch, but I may be wrong. I am aware there ar enhancement requests around

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

I have been able to make unit test which reproduces the false warning. And I have fixed the way the classloader was created. Thanks for the insights. Nicolas > Le 13 avr. 2018 à 07:38, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> As far as I can see, the classpath u

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > As far as I can see, the classpath used by checkForkedPath is the > proper one. The function which manipulates the classpath to add the > Ant runtime [1] is called before. So I should start looking into the > AntClassLoader which is improperly finding the An

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

> Le 12 avr. 2018 à 16:57, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : > > On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > >> The Junit task is printing a warning if it finds multiple versions of >> Ant in the classpath of the unit tests. It seems it doesn’t do >> correctly the job if the ant runtime is explicitly remov

Re: Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

On 2018-04-12, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > The Junit task is printing a warning if it finds multiple versions of > Ant in the classpath of the unit tests. It seems it doesn’t do > correctly the job if the ant runtime is explicitly removed from the > classpath. Quite possible. > Here the function wh

Junit Task warning about multiple versions of Ant

The Junit task is printing a warning if it finds multiple versions of Ant in the classpath of the unit tests. It seems it doesn’t do correctly the job if the ant runtime is explicitly removed from the classpath. Here the function which checks the classpath: https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/mas

RE: question about an IDE

fault Netbeans project structure was (and still is) based upon Ant if you create a project from scratch. It boils down to being an Ant project. Can't say the same about Eclipse. Netbeans also likes existing Ant projects created from outside of the IDE. But these days, most projects that I

AW: question about an IDE

thing about that. Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de] > Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2015 03:35 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: question about an IDE > > Hello Benjamin, > > this is perfectly OK to ask a

Re: question about an IDE

Hello Benjamin, this is perfectly OK to ask about which IDE to use. Different people have different preferences, I use Jetbrain’s IntelliJ, some people use Emacs, … I have used Eclipse too. Best regards, Antoine On Mar 29, 2015, at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Spero wrote: > I’m new to the mail

question about an IDE

I’m new to the mailing list and I have something to ask. When developing java programs what do you think is a better IDE to use, Eclipse or Netbeans? I read somewhere on a website that Netbeans is developed from the Ant project. Is this true? I used jGrasp to develop my programs when I studi

Re: Reasons why Java 7 got me excited about Ant 2

gularly), maintaining an binary API would be quite complicated. Let's stick the core of Ant to Java. Nicolas > > > 2012/2/26 wolfgang häfelinger > >> Hi there, >> >> how about rewriting Ant 2.0 using Scala? Scala appears to be well >> suited as a scr

Re: Reasons why Java 7 got me excited about Ant 2

n in other languages the works with JVM (scala, groovy, ... etc). This will allow contribution from users experts in java. 2012/2/26 wolfgang häfelinger > Hi there, > > how about rewriting Ant 2.0 using Scala? Scala appears to be well > suited as a scripting language. Charged with a

Re: Reasons why Java 7 got me excited about Ant 2

Hi there, how about rewriting Ant 2.0 using Scala? Scala appears to be well suited as a scripting language. Charged with a scripting language, I could write low level macros on the fly. // Wolfgang On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Bruce Atherton wrote: > I thought I'd expand on why

Reasons why Java 7 got me excited about Ant 2

I thought I'd expand on why I got so excited about NIO 2.0 and JSR 203 as well as the other changes in Java 7. I can see I have done a bad job of selling the benefits of a refactoring for potential volunteers. Reading through the changes that were introduced in Java 7, it seems to me tha

REMINDER: Participation Requested: Survey about Open-Source Software Development

University of Alabama (v) 205-348-9829 (f) 205-348-0219 http://www.cs.ua.edu/~carver -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Carver [mailto:opensourcesur...@cs.ua.edu] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 11:25 AM To: 'dev@ant.apache.org' Subject: Participation Requested: Survey about O

Participation Requested: Survey about Open-Source Software Development

Hi, Drs. Jeffrey Carver, Rosanna Guadagno, Debra McCallum, and Mr. Amiangshu Bosu, University of Alabama, and Dr. Lorin Hochstein, University of Southern California, are conducting a survey of open-source software developers. This survey seeks to understand how developers on distributed, virtual

Re: Has anyone got any thoughts (positive or negative) about this?

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 21:07, Jeffrey E Care wrote: > Kevin Jackson wrote on 04/05/2011 04:40:12 AM: > >> http://code.google.com/p/winant/ >> >> I'm just looking at html5boilerplate and the build script is IMHO >> fairly standard for a none build person and I came across this >> reference to an '

Re: Has anyone got any thoughts (positive or negative) about this?

On 4/5/2011 5:07 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2011-04-05, Kevin Jackson wrote: http://code.google.com/p/winant/ Should we add it to the external tools section? So far we've waited for people to submit their own entries for the page but I don't see any harm in creating one ourselves from the pu

Re: Has anyone got any thoughts (positive or negative) about this?

Kevin Jackson wrote on 04/05/2011 04:40:12 AM: > http://code.google.com/p/winant/ > > I'm just looking at html5boilerplate and the build script is IMHO > fairly standard for a none build person and I came across this > reference to an 'installer for ant' > > Weird? I can't say that I understan

Re: Has anyone got any thoughts (positive or negative) about this?

On 2011-04-05, Kevin Jackson wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/winant/ I've seen it come up in some searches but never looked into it. > I'm just looking at html5boilerplate and the build script is IMHO > fairly standard for a none build person and I came across this > reference to an 'installer

Has anyone got any thoughts (positive or negative) about this?

http://code.google.com/p/winant/ I'm just looking at html5boilerplate and the build script is IMHO fairly standard for a none build person and I came across this reference to an 'installer for ant' Weird? Should we add it to the external tools section? Kev -

Re: SV: Thinking about a .NET Antlib Release

+1 from me too. I can help supporting it. Antoine On 1/23/11 2:40 PM, Roos Tomas wrote: > I Like! > > > > Från: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] > Skickat: sö 2011-01-23 08:34 > Till: dev@ant.apache.org > Ämne: Thinking abo

SV: Thinking about a .NET Antlib Release

I Like! Från: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Skickat: sö 2011-01-23 08:34 Till: dev@ant.apache.org Ämne: Thinking about a .NET Antlib Release Hi all, the last (and so far only) release of the .NET Antlib occured more than four years ago. Since

Thinking about a .NET Antlib Release

) so it seems to be used by some people. I'm thinking about putting together a 1.1 release sometime next week and hope I'll find at least two other people who can support it. Any comments? Anything I should also consider? Stefan [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/antlibs/do

A survey about 'Build And Release Management'

The survey is mainly around Eclipse and the surveyed people are Eclipse users, but at the page 17, interesting to see that Ant is the preferred choice for 'Build And Release Management' for more than half of them. :) http://www.eclipse.org/org/community_survey/Eclipse_Survey_2010_Report.pdf I d

Re: A Question About ANT

he following questions of mine: I'm glad you've found your way to the project's mailing list ;-) > 1. I was wondering if ANT has gone under any major restructuring/redesign > initiative in its history. About nine years ago a major restructuring has been discussed, several

Re: A Question About ANT

hi On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Mohammed Aziz Parande wrote: > Hi, > > > > I am a graduate student in the Department of Information Systems at the > University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). I am doing research in the > area of software engineering. I would very much appreciate if you c

A Question About ANT

Hi, I am a graduate student in the Department of Information Systems at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). I am doing research in the area of software engineering. I would very much appreciate if you could answer the following questions of mine: 1. I was wondering if ANT h

Re: Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

class I have a few questions about current code: Firstly, Wabbit I am somewhat at a loss because I personally attempted, twice if I recall correctly, to engage you on this subject back when the API redesign was taking place, what, over two years ago? I don't want to appear unwilling to

Re: Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

e: Hello all-- I've just reviewed the latest Ant trunk (1.8RC1 I believe) to estimate how much effort it would take to port my extensions (esp. those dependent on the 1.7x PropertyHelper implementation). For this class I have a few questions about current code: 1) No way for an e

Re: Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

ass I have a few questions about current code: 1) No way for an evaluator to test if it's already installed as getDelegates() is protected and there is no public getEvaluators() method. 2) Still no way to have PropertyHelpers passed through to subprojects automatically (all configuration l

Re: Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

a few questions about current code: 1) No way for an evaluator to test if it's already installed as getDelegates() is protected and there is no public getEvaluators() method. 2) Still no way to have PropertyHelpers passed through to subprojects automatically (all configuration l

Re: Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

ld take to port my extensions (esp. those dependent on the 1.7x PropertyHelper implementation). For this class I have a few questions about current code: 1) No way for an evaluator to test if it's already installed as getDelegates() is protected and there is no public getEvaluators() method. 2)

Re: Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

tions about current code: Firstly, Wabbit I am somewhat at a loss because I personally attempted, twice if I recall correctly, to engage you on this subject back when the API redesign was taking place, what, over two years ago? I don't want to appear unwilling to work with you here, bu

Questions about new (1.8) PropertyHelper+pals...

Hello all-- I've just reviewed the latest Ant trunk (1.8RC1 I believe) to estimate how much effort it would take to port my extensions (esp. those dependent on the 1.7x PropertyHelper implementation). For this class I have a few questions about current code: 1) No way for an evaluator to

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

--- On Thu, 9/17/09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig > Subject: Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}? > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Date: Thursday, September 17, 2009, 11:07 PM > On 2009-09-17, Matt Benson > wrote: > > > So I take it you don&#x

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

On 2009-09-17, Matt Benson wrote: > So I take it you don't see any value in making all propertyhelper > delegates optional, as is the case with those provided by the props > antlib? To be honest, that thought never occured to me. > Or are you concerned about adoption, or...?

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

So I take it you don't see any value in making all propertyhelper delegates optional, as is the case with those provided by the props antlib? Or are you concerned about adoption, or...? -Matt --- On Thu, 9/17/09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig > Subject: Re

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

On 2009-09-04, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > I suggest to add another core PropertyEvaluator that works like the one > for toString but doesn't invoke toString() on the reference (but leaves > that to IntrospectionHelper if necessary). It is in with svn revision 816153 > As usual,

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

suggest to add another core PropertyEvaluator that works like the one > for toString but doesn't invoke toString() on the reference (but leaves > that to IntrospectionHelper if necessary). > > As usual, I'm unsure about the name of the prefix > > ${fromRefId:foo

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

You might also want to check out the refs and types evaluators from the props antlib here... they're a little generic though. -Matt --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig > Subject: Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}? > To: dev@ant.apache.org

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

On 2009-09-04, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:25 AM, wrote: >>> I suggest to add another core PropertyEvaluator that works like the one >>> for toString but doesn't invoke toString() on the reference (but leaves >>> that to IntrospectionHelper if necessary). >>> The ${ref:

Re: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:25 AM, wrote: >>I suggest to add another core PropertyEvaluator that works like the one >>for toString but doesn't invoke toString() on the reference (but leaves >>that to IntrospectionHelper if necessary). >> >>The ${ref:} and ${refid:} ideas look prettier but are more li

AW: How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

gt;. > >I suggest to add another core PropertyEvaluator that works like the one >for toString but doesn't invoke toString() on the reference (but leaves >that to IntrospectionHelper if necessary). > >As usual, I'm unsure about the name of the prefix > >${fromRefId:foo

How about ${fromRefId:some-reference}?

invoke toString() on the reference (but leaves that to IntrospectionHelper if necessary). As usual, I'm unsure about the name of the prefix ${fromRefId:foo} ${ref:foo} ${refid:foo} ${fromReference:foo} ... The ${ref:} and ${refid:} ideas look prettier but are more lik

Re: discussion about conditional structures

>> using condition in target Ok, I found the topic you're talking about : http://marc.info/?l=ant-dev&m=124052209931008&w=2 Append task as the first element of task would be really nice. Do you know if it's implemented ? or planned to be implemented ? >> usin

Re: discussion about conditional structures

(Jeff) Care ca...@us.ibm.com IBM WebSphere Application Server WAS Release Engineering Benjamin de Dardel wrote on 06/22/2009 05:54:32 PM: > [image removed] > > discussion about conditional structures > > Benjamin de Dardel > > to: > > Ant Develope

discussion about conditional structures

Hi all, I suppose that there have been a lot of discussion about conditional structures, but I would like to open another one. For now, I notice two solutions : >> solution 1 : ant approach, using if and unless parameters. // // // Disadvantages : - not as simple as it sho

RE: question about multiple projects env

Zhukov [mailto:alekse...@hotmail.com] Sent: Mon 5/18/2009 1:33 PM To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Ivy: question about multiple projects env Hello all, I already posted this question on ivy-users list but got no answer. Please, can you help me with that? I have tried to repeat

Ivy: question about multiple projects env

Hello all, I already posted this question on ivy-users list but got no answer. Please, can you help me with that? I have tried to repeat the example of using Ivy in multiple projects environment similar to what is given in ivy tutorial (http://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.1.0-r

Re: How about moving all SCM and EJB tasks into Antlibs?

I like the concept simply because it seems like the best way to get old, mostly unused ant tasks out of the standard release. I'm not so concerned about moving the tasks that are commonly used out of optional to their own antlibs (though I have no objection to it) because I can't

Re: How about moving all SCM and EJB tasks into Antlibs?

OK, I consider the answer to be "no, let's keep them in Ant main." Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: About

On 2008-11-11, j2ee6610 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what's resolveexecutable? an attribute of the exec task. > how do I set it? http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/exec.html Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: About

s well. > > Stefan > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this me

Re: About

this really is a user-list question. On 2008-11-11, j2ee6610 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >spawn="true" > /> > > that is my script > i simply just want to run activemq.exe then call it that and not activemq 8-) executable="activemq.exe" likely works, you may need

Re: About

you add -verbose to your ant invocation and include this output? > > -- > Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- V

Re: About

j2ee6610 wrote: > i simply just want to run activemq.exe > but it's not working > > I'm sure that the path is all correct the error msg is that it could not > find the specified file What is the *exact* error message? Please copy and paste please. Can you add -verbose to your ant invocation an

About

that is my script i simply just want to run activemq.exe but it's not working I'm sure that the path is all correct the error msg is that it could not find the specified file -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/About-

Re: How about moving all SCM and EJB tasks into Antlibs?

Hi, > I'd like to move those tasks (see subject) that don't get tested but > released with Ant into separate Antlibs and deprecate them in trunk. > My current candidate list consists of all SCM tasks (including CVS) > and all vendor specific EJB tasks - one Antlib per task (or family of > tasks in

Re: How about moving all SCM and EJB tasks into Antlibs?

On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Remie Bolte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Will those antlibs be bundled with the package, or do picture them > as a separate download? I'd make them a separate download, even though we might consider doing a "ant with all antlibs" download in addition to a stripped down core.

Re: How about moving all SCM and EJB tasks into Antlibs?

Hi, Will those antlibs be bundled with the package, or do picture them as a separate download? Reason I ask is because I think SCM tasks are commonly used in buildscripts. Cheers, Remie On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to move th

How about moving all SCM and EJB tasks into Antlibs?

Hi all, I'd like to move those tasks (see subject) that don't get tested but released with Ant into separate Antlibs and deprecate them in trunk. My current candidate list consists of all SCM tasks (including CVS) and all vendor specific EJB tasks - one Antlib per task (or family of tasks in the c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43794] - Message about JAVA_HOME is confusing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43794] New: - Message about JAVA_HOME is confusing

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43794 Summary: Message about JAVA_HOME is confusing Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-22 02:31 --- (In reply to comment #1) > The whole thing about filesystem granularity is trouble; it is worse on > windows. > > e warn about clock differences because if you have a network

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-22 02:15 --- The whole thing about filesystem granularity is trouble; it is worse on windows. e warn about clock differences because if you have a network mounted disk on a different clock, you are in deep t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43665] New: - dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43665 Summary: dependset complaints about files from the future when they are 0.5s old Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43301] - [Patch] Note about java.lang.OutOfMemoryError in junit

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43301] New: - [Patch] Note about java.lang.OutOfMemoryError in junit

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43301 Summary: [Patch] Note about java.lang.OutOfMemoryError in junit Product: Ant Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Com

Re: Ant 1.7.1 - what about a release soon?

I think that 1) we need a volunteer to be the release manager. 2) identify the must-fix bugs (i.e. regressions in 1.6.5 -> 1.7.0) 3) identify the nice to fix bugs (i.e. bugs with simple identified fixes). Peter On 7/16/07, Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, We mentioned previ

Re: Ant 1.7.1 - what about a release soon?

Kevin Jackson wrote: Hi all, We mentioned previously that we should get a release of fixes/enhancements out around the june mark (~6months on from 1.7.0). Well we're late :) Does anyone have anything that would definitely need us to hold back a release in the next 3-4 weeks? -we need to

Ant 1.7.1 - what about a release soon?

Hi all, We mentioned previously that we should get a release of fixes/enhancements out around the june mark (~6months on from 1.7.0). Well we're late :) Does anyone have anything that would definitely need us to hold back a release in the next 3-4 weeks? I'd love to have the debian stuff ready

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42483] New: - subant incorrectly complaining about circular references

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42483 Summary: subant incorrectly complaining about circular references Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

Thread about Ant 1.7.0 on theserverside

Hi, I have seen an interesting thread of discussion on "theserverside" concerning Ant 1.7.0. There are the typical discussions about whether ant should be procedural out of the box (if, try/catch, for, foreach) and comparisons between ant and maven. Regards, Ant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40624] - Documentation misleading about use of ANT_HOME

|FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-29 15:51 --- Added a note in the manual about /etc/ant.conf: A jpackage rpm version of ant may be installed on your machine, say as part of install of Fedora Core 3. If another version of ant is installed, the rpm version wil

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40624] - Documentation misleading about use of ANT_HOME

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40624] New: - Documentation misleading about use of ANT_HOME

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40624 Summary: Documentation misleading about use of ANT_HOME Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28624] - about using ant.bat in

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36201] - No complain about asterisks in file names

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Question about property name

n things like Java. Actually the Jboss test suite is driving our suggestions. I agree having one big switch is scary because Execute() is use everywhere and I have be looking for other options. Does this mean we should be thinking about adding a task option/property? Something like "succe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27355] - question about VSS task in Ant1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Question about property name

nVMS properties, believe me when I say that I completely understand your comments. I also agree with your idea about a pluggable exit interpreter in the future. I feel I should explain in detail as to why I thought Ant needed an OpenVMS property and that I'm open to any "guidance

RE: Question about property name

e Ant junit test failures on OpenVMS. Thank you for your comments regarding new "magic" OpenVMS properties, believe me when I say that I completely understand your comments. I also agree with your idea about a pluggable exit interpreter in the future. I feel I should explain

RE: Question about property name

Thanks for responding Steve. I knew this was an area where we needed "guidance." I agree that your idea about a pluggable exit interpreter type would be much more flexible...and safer. If I understand what you're suggesting, it seems like a good solution for the future, but mayb

Re: Question about property name

erride of the java version for javac, but it was argued about for a while first, and went in to let people build java1.4 things on java1.5, so it was quite obvious to a lot of people and Apache gump. Just for completeness, here's what we propose...a simple change in Execute.java to isFail

Question about property name

Hi, We're (a couple of us here at HP) are in the process of making some changes to better support Ant on HP's OpenVMS operating system. See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39359 One of the changes we are making has to do with determining success or failure based on return value

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36201] - No complain about asterisks in file names

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36201] - No complain about asterisks in file names

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Quick question about properties

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you point out where you have seen this reference so that it can be modified. I trusted Steve's writing 8-) I trusted Stefan's reviewing of my writing :) ---

  1   2   3   >