Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-04-23, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
I agree, however it may be good to update the 1.8.0 manual with a
warning that the behavior is currently not as intended and will
change, published as soon as the solution is changed.
The manual is a tagged svn revisio.
Gi
Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[...] You can't extend an imported extension point with a target
from the importing build file (which is the primary use-case, really).
Right.
[...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a ba
+1 for fixing
Peter
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old
>>> behavior isn't documented and we s
On 2010-04-23, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
> I agree, however it may be good to update the 1.8.0 manual with a
> warning that the behavior is currently not as intended and will
> change, published as soon as the solution is changed.
The manual is a tagged svn revisio.
Given that Antoine intends to
I agree, however it may be good to update the 1.8.0 manual with a
warning that the behavior is currently not as intended and will change,
published as soon as the solution is changed.
br martijn
On 23/04/2010 2:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
currently extension-point and import don't
I think that since the code doesn't address the primary usecase, that
trumps pretty-well all considerations. It is hard to imagine how
someone would be relying on the order of the extension point/extension
evaluation in order to avoid the extension point. Since the behaviour
isn't documented a
On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi all,
currently extension-point and import don't play together like they are
supposed to. You can't extend an imported extension point with a
target
from the importing build file (which is the primary use-case, really).
Attached to this
On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old
>> behavior isn't documented and we shouldn't even try to keep it.
> I agree. Fixing the primary use-case trumps this pa
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> [...] You can't extend an imported extension point with a target
> from the importing build file (which is the primary use-case, really).
Right.
> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old
> behavior isn't do
Hi all,
currently extension-point and import don't play together like they are
supposed to. You can't extend an imported extension point with a target
from the importing build file (which is the primary use-case, really).
Attached to this bug is a patch that fixes the problem (including an
AntUn
10 matches
Mail list logo
