On 2010-04-23, Dominique Devienne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote:
>> [...] Personally I think the changed behavior isn't a bad thing, the old
>> behavior isn't documented and we shouldn't even try to keep it.
> I agree. Fixing the primary use-case trumps this particular behavior.
> If we can't fix the bug without allow this "ahead-of-time" use of the
> extension point, it's no big deal to me.
Technically we could also disallow it, but it would take some additional
effort that I'm not sure is worth it, that's why I started this poll.
Thanks
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
