[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

2005-10-12 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

2005-10-12 Thread Gump Integration Build
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

svn commit: r320656 - /ant/core/trunk/docs.xml

2005-10-12 Thread bodewig
Author: bodewig Date: Wed Oct 12 21:56:01 2005 New Revision: 320656 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=320656&view=rev Log: was fixing the wrong directory Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/ant/core/trunk/docs.xml?rev=3

Re: Quick question about properties

2005-10-12 Thread Kev Jackson
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However if I try to run the project buildfile (./build.xml), none of the properties are available (quick checks with echo just give me variables instead of expanded properties). This is not what I've se

Re: Quick question about properties

2005-10-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes the properties file is being loaded (just rechecked now). It > seems to be a problem if I reference a property from the common > properties file within the project specific file. Hmm, may it just be the order in which files are lo

Re: Quick question about properties

2005-10-12 Thread Kev Jackson
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: However if I try to run the project buildfile (./build.xml), none of the properties are available (quick checks with echo just give me variables instead of expanded properties). This is not what I've se

Re: property expansion in XmlFragment

2005-10-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>echoXML does property expansion, >> Could you please introduce a flag in XMLFragement to make this >> optional? > > Could do, but see my comments below:

Re: Quick question about properties

2005-10-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However if I try to run the project buildfile (./build.xml), none of > the properties are available (quick checks with echo just give me > variables instead of expanded properties). This is not what I've seen in the past. Properties d

Quick question about properties

2005-10-12 Thread Kev Jackson
Hi all, I'm trying to refactor a build file we have here into a commonly used set of targets and then project specifc targets. Here's my directory setup ./common/build.xml ./common/build.properties ./build.xml (shown below) Now in the common/build.xml I use the property file tag to read in

Re: Parallel processing option for subant? - Parallel Ant Subsystem?

2005-10-12 Thread Kyle R. Burton
Hello, I'm sorry I haven't participated in this thread until now. We needed a parallelizing build tool where I work and have made a modification to ant that executes independent targets in parallel where possible. We are not using most of the standard ant tasks in our parallel builds, but have e

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Yes, I believe executor should be a parameter to all these tasks. Now, have anybody any problems recently bootstrapping on Solaris? After we switched to svn, I cannot build any more. - Alexey. Matt Benson wrote: Alexey, I first thought it was different as well. But for example, if we added

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Matt Benson
Alexey, I first thought it was different as well. But for example, if we added to and friends the ability to specify the executor type to use (I haven't thought that through, it could be a bad idea), then your parallel executor could be made to work for , , , etc... right, or not? -Matt --- "A

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37055] - Copy target sometimes overwrites files, even if overwrite=false or overwrite is not set (defaults to false)

2005-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
This may be different. It is more like parallel in . - Alexey. Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Jeffrey E. Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been considering enhancing the task to allow it to process builds in parallel. I think Alexey had started work on this using a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37055] New: - Copy target sometimes overwrites files, even if overwrite=false or overwrite is not set (defaults to false)

2005-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36970] - Invalid return code in batch program

2005-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: --- Jeffrey E Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/12/2005 07:50:04 AM: [SNIP] to an extent is the most prone to race conditions, as it is running stuff in the same project. a subant running in parallel is likely to sh

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Matt Benson
--- Jeffrey E Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on > 10/12/2005 07:50:04 AM: [SNIP] > > to an extent is the most prone to race > conditions, as it is > > running stuff in the same project. a subant > running in parallel is > > likely to share much less,

RE: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Jeffrey E Care [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/12/2005 07:50:04 AM: > > > Input is another issue. > > That is certainly true; I had not considered the task, mostly > because in WAS we don't/can't use it. It would have to be documented in > th

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Jeffrey E Care
Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/12/2005 07:50:04 AM: > > Would that matter? All property reads/writes would be confined to the > > thread there the project is being executed. The main problem I think would > > be in the logger, but I've modified our custom logger to do thread >

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Jeffrey E Care wrote: This may sound naive, but honestly I would not expect many. Ant already has the task, which of course is running things in other threads; additionally in the WAS build tools we already have what is essentially the equivalent to a parallel subant, and it's working

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Jeffrey E Care
> > This may sound naive, but honestly I would not expect many. > > > > Ant already has the task, which of course is running things in > > other threads; additionally in the WAS build tools we already have what is > > essentially the equivalent to a parallel subant, and it's working fine. >

Re: property expansion in XmlFragment

2005-10-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Steve Loughran wrote: Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: echoXML does property expansion, Could you please introduce a flag in XMLFragement to make this optional? Could do, but see my comments below: The .NET tasks use XMLFragement for embedded bu

Re: Parallel processing option for subant?

2005-10-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Jeffrey E Care wrote: This may sound naive, but honestly I would not expect many. Ant already has the task, which of course is running things in other threads; additionally in the WAS build tools we already have what is essentially the equivalent to a parallel subant, and it's working fine.

Re: property expansion in XmlFragment

2005-10-12 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: echoXML does property expansion, Could you please introduce a flag in XMLFragement to make this optional? Could do, but see my comments below: The .NET tasks use XMLFragement for embedded build files and I do not wan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37040] - TSTAMP ignoring the locale attribute

2005-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37040] New: - TSTAMP ignoring the locale attribute

2005-10-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu