Alexey, I first thought it was different as well. But for example, if we added to <ant> and friends the ability to specify the executor type to use (I haven't thought that through, it could be a bad idea), then your parallel executor could be made to work for <ant>, <antcall>, <subant>, etc...
right, or not? -Matt --- "Alexey N. Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This may be different. It is more like parallel in > <apply>. > > - Alexey. > > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Jeffrey E. Care > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> I have been considering enhancing the <subant> > task to allow it to > >> process builds in parallel. > >> > > > > I think Alexey had started work on this using a > custom Executor. You > > should coordinate with him - Alexey? > > > > Cheers > > > > Stefan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > / Alexey N. Solofnenko > MDL Information Systems, Inc. > work: 510-357-2222x1726 > home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ > / > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
