cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java

jkf 2005/01/10 15:44:57 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Project.java Log: Minor update to remove jdk1.1 workaround Revision ChangesPath 1.182 +4 -34 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.java Index: Project.java ==

Re: local properties

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > As the main use case for local properties is > we > could just implement them for macrodefs, and if > necessary > extend them later to be the free style properties. [SNIP] > We could implement this as a trial in ant cvs and > pull it if there a

Re: Avoiding logging loops

Hello Antoine, Thank you for the quick response. To be precise, the current code also avoids infinite loops except that it treats recursion as an impossible event and throws an exception. The proposed change also avoids infinite loops but by ignoring recursive calls to Project.fireMessageLoggedEven

Re: recursive properties expansion [was RE local properties]

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > what is the number of your bug report ? http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29347 -- Jack J. Woehr # The year 2005 marks the PO Box 51, Golden, CO 80402 # thirtieth anniversary of my http://www.well.com/~jax # entry into anti-WO

Re: Avoiding logging loops

Hello Ceki, I have not had the time to check your suggested code modification, but it makes sense to avoid these infinite loops. What do other ant committers think ? (I have moved the discussion to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I think this is more appropriate). Antoine Ceki Gülcü wrote: Hello, While runni

Re: local properties

Hi, my 2 cents, I like rather than (the latter reminds me of Visual Basic, oh shame). I also like it if the local property is thread safe, because this might be useful for some advanced ant users. Peter, I would like it if you try it in cvs. Cheers, Antoine Peter Reilly wrote: Jose Alberto Fe

Re: recursive properties expansion [was RE local properties]

Hello Jack, what is the number of your bug report ? Cheers, Antoine Jack J. Woehr wrote And recursive property expansion! @[EMAIL PROTECTED]@{property}.expansion}! I believe an implementation of this still languishes as a code example in a bug I filed ... ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24918] - [PATCH] Permit console input to be sent to

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java

jkf 2005/01/10 12:18:27 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Main.java Log: Minor update in ant help. description for -nouserlib and -noclasspath were on one line. Revision ChangesPath 1.113 +2 -2 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java Index: Mai

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33031] - Building ejb for Websphere 5.1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33031] New: - Building ejb for Websphere 5.1.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ANT does not seem closing JAR files correctly.

After some research I found that I had the same file twice in a JAR (two inner filesets were referencing the same file - this is an interesting situation too - fileset joining would behave better). There is a bug already that inclusion of the same file breaks ANT. So I fixed my build by setting

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: [SNIP] > >I'm here. Basically the clone task is a minimally > >functional extension to UnknownElement. I added a > >little bit of code to UnknownElement and > >RuntimeConfigurable to make it easier to add the > level > >of indirecti

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

Matt Benson wrote: --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't have a better name, and don't like the feature so far. FWIW I tend to agree with DD, but don't want to continue the discussion in bugzilla - could you guys please

Re: local properties

Peter Reilly wrote: > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > >We left it nowhere. > > > > > Is true. > > > > >I still think my simple addition to will solve 90% of the > >use cases > >with very low impact across the code. But as anything, people will have to > >understand > >when to use it prop

Re: local properties

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: We left it nowhere. Is true. I still think my simple addition to will solve 90% of the use cases with very low impact across the code. But as anything, people will have to understand when to use it properly and so on. The patch is there in bugzilla, but I will n

Re: jpackage, JDKs and Ant

Steve Loughran wrote: Having just upgrade to Suse9.2 wierd and wonderful things have happened to my java setup, like the java1.4.2 JDK has moved somewhere, and now all the java commands are in /usr/bin, symlinked through /etc/alternatives to what looks like a new version of 1.4.2. Also,JAVA_HOM

jpackage, JDKs and Ant

Having just upgrade to Suse9.2 wierd and wonderful things have happened to my java setup, like the java1.4.2 JDK has moved somewhere, and now all the java commands are in /usr/bin, symlinked through /etc/alternatives to what looks like a new version of 1.4.2. Also,JAVA_HOME is mapped to the JVM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29877] - TarBuffer cycles forever on some TAR file inputs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/tar TarBuffer.java

peterreilly2005/01/10 09:12:30 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/tar Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH TarBuffer.java Log: sync Revision ChangesPath No revision No

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/tar TarBuffer.java

peterreilly2005/01/10 09:12:10 Modified:.CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/tar TarBuffer.java Log: fix for infinite loop on incorrect tar files PR: 29877 Obtained from: Ray Waldin Revision ChangesPath 1.41 +1 -0 ant/CONTR

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit BriefJUnitResultFormatter.java

peterreilly2005/01/10 09:10:41 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH BriefJUnitResultFormatter.java Log: opps Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.11.2.7

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't have a better name, and don't like the > feature so far. > > FWIW I tend to agree with DD, but don't want to > continue the > discussion in bugzilla - could you guys please come > over t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28776] - tar task produces incorrect tar files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have a better name, and don't like the feature so far. FWIW I tend to agree with DD, but don't want to continue the discussion in bugzilla - could you guys please come over to [EMAIL PROTECTED] again? 8-) Stefan -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5035] - Patternset and fileset enhancements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32631] - allow includes / excludes for fileset references

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ANT does not seem closing JAR files correctly.

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Alexey N. Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just found a broken Jar file. "zip -Tf" produced the following > output: > > zip warning: local and central headers differ for (null) > zip warning: offset 6--local = ed, central = aa > zip warning: o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25777] - [PATCH] [REGRESSION] Cannot pass composite path reference between scripts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs DefBase.java

bodewig 2005/01/10 05:26:47 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs DefBase.java Log: Save three LOC Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +2 -5 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/DefBase.java Index: DefBase.java ==

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32437] - NullPointerException when setting core class loader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks java.html

stevel 2005/01/10 02:59:31 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks java.html Log: updating year before Stefan gets there. Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html Index: java.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32983] - java task: jar is not searched for relative to the dir setting

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks java.html

stevel 2005/01/10 02:55:23 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks java.html Log: More on jar attribute Revision ChangesPath 1.34 +37 -4 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/java.html Index: java.html === RCS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33026] New: - NPE in jar task when zipgroupfileset contains maleformed jar file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5035] - Patternset and fileset enhancements

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32948] - javac task passes -source option to javac 1.2/1.1 which does not support -source option

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/compilers DefaultCompilerAdapter.java

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has the deviating mail format to do with the size of the commit? Yes. If your commit mail exceeds the mailing list size limit (100kB IIRC), it will get this other format. Stefan -

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm

bodewig 2005/01/10 00:40:52 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH PropertySet.java xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH faq.xml xdocs/stylesheets Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH

cvs commit: ant/docs contributors.html external.html faq.html

bodewig 2005/01/10 00:38:05 Modified:docs contributors.html external.html faq.html Log: regenerate site Revision ChangesPath 1.53 +1 -1 ant/docs/contributors.html Index: contributors.html ===

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm

bodewig 2005/01/10 00:37:07 Modified:.docs.xml docs/manual/CoreTasks copy.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types PropertySet.java xdocsexternal.xml faq.xml xdocs/stylesheets templates.vm Log: Yes, it's that tim