--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
[SNIP]
> >I'm here.  Basically the clone task is a minimally
> >functional extension to UnknownElement.  I added a
> >little bit of code to UnknownElement and
> >RuntimeConfigurable to make it easier to add the
> level
> >of indirection using a UE subclass.  Clone just
> puts
> >it to use.  So... fire away.  :)
> >  
> >
> I do feel a bit quesy about using a sub-task of
> UnknownElement as
> a task. There is a lot of magic going on with UEs
> and RCs.
> 
Next question on that subject... I had thought of
retroactively causing UE.makeObject() satisfy the
contract of some new interface and having Clone also
implement that interface.  Same result, slightly more
structured design.  Does that affect your feelings on
the subject, Peter?

-Matt


        
                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to