DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26528] - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Ant 1.6.1 & License

The vote for including the Apache License version 2 in ant 1.6.1 will be over only on February 2. I am not quite sure whether this is a PMC vote ? Right now we have +1 from Conor and from Jan, and -1 from Erik. If this is a PMC vote, I believe we need two PMC +1 for that. I did not vote yet, beca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26539] New: - tag cannot suppress xdoclet tags with hyphens

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26528] - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

New Ant Task Offered for Submission - 'warn' - a conditional echo at level MSG_WARN

Hi, I've written an ant task that might be useful for others, and you might want to add to the existing ant tasks. I call it '' - and it is, quite simply, '' without the actual exiting part. :-) In other words, it offers functionality with the if= and unless= functionality of . It was

Ant 1.6.1 beta1 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, ant 1.6.1 beta1 is released. Apache Ant 1.6.1beta1 is now available for download . The ASF Board has approved the new Apache License 2.0. For a copy of that license, please see http://www.apache.org/licen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19220] - [PATCH] add nested conditions to

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Harp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 9:19 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission? > > > > --- Matt Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > me, it's a matter of how our users get the

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Harp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 7:48 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission? > > > >Hi, > > > >you should make a tar file with your new tasks and attach it to a bug > >report

cvs commit: ant/docs index.html antnews.html

antoine 2004/01/29 13:12:03 Modified:xdocsindex.xml antnews.xml docs index.html antnews.html Log: Release of ant1.6.1beta1 Revision ChangesPath 1.60 +17 -1 ant/xdocs/index.xml Index: index.xml

[PATCH] Allowing xslt task the use of extension classes not on the system classpath

xslt task loads extension classes from system classpath only (tested with xalan - xalan uses the context loader for loading extension classes). I think, it will be a good idea that the classpath for extension classes can be configured in the ant script. This patch sets the context loader used f

cvs commit: ant/docs index.html antnews.html

antoine 2004/01/29 12:21:16 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH build.xml docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH credits.html cover.html xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH index.xml antnews.xml docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH index.html antnews.html Log: Pr

[PATCH] FAQ how-do-I addition

I hope I got the patchfile and faq xml format down correctly. -Jeff- - Index: faq.xml === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/ant/xdocs/faq.xml,v retrieving revision 1.46 diff -u -r1.46 faq.xml --- faq.xml 8 Jan 2004 17:01:27 - 1.46 ++

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - [PATCH] nested for PLUS composite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - [PATCH] nested for PLUS composite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - [PATCH] nested for PLUS composite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - [PATCH] nested for PLUS composite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26528] New: - test

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

> > > > Maintenance would always be done by us, since we have a vested > interest in > > keeping the code base up to date and fully tested. Additionaly, having > > Apache control the code would allow other developers to add > functionality to > > it if they so desire instead of having to wait on us

Re: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

Matt Harp wrote: Maintenance would always be done by us, since we have a vested interest in keeping the code base up to date and fully tested. Additionaly, having Apache control the code would allow other developers to add functionality to it if they so desire instead of having to wait on us to add

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

> --- Matt Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > me, it's a matter of how our users get the Ant > > tasks, which is much easier > > if they ship with Ant. If they don't ship with Ant, > > then we have to support > > installing a seperate jar file for Ant users, and > > then it also requires the > > u

RE: BeanShellDef - java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition: AList

Hi, > > Looking at your example of reflectdef, the only thing I > don't like is > > the line: > > hello.class; > > I prefer how it is done in beanshelldef with the classname > attribute. > > That is just my $0.02,so do what you think is best. > > > I have just realized that one does not

[Fwd: howto trigger an Ant build within java]

Hi, I am looking into using Ant (v1.6.0) more in my webapp so I can offer offline publishing equivalents. I am transforming some config XML into a build file. I then want to load that build file into a new org.apache.tools.ant.Project. The build.xml gets produce properly (it runs successfully from

Re: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

Matt Benson wrote: --- Matt Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: me, it's a matter of how our users get the Ant tasks, which is much easier if they ship with Ant. If they don't ship with Ant, then we have to support installing a seperate jar file for Ant users, and then it also requires the user to e

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

--- Matt Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > me, it's a matter of how our users get the Ant > tasks, which is much easier > if they ship with Ant. If they don't ship with Ant, > then we have to support > installing a seperate jar file for Ant users, and > then it also requires the > user to explicitl

howto trigger an Ant build within java

[resending -- didn't seem to make it through] Hi, I am looking into using Ant (v1.6.0) more in my webapp so I can offer offline publishing equivalents. I am transforming some config XML into a build file. I then want to load that build file into a new org.apache.tools.ant.Project. The build.xml get

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

> > My new tasks all have to deal with integration into Surround > > SCM by Seapine > > Software (www.seapine.com). I work for Seapine and have > > written the tasks > > and we already ship them in our releases, but we would prefer > > to have these > > included in the Ant releases just like Perfor

Re: howto trigger an Ant build within java

[moving to dev list] Jim Fuller wrote: From: Robert Koberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 January 2004 02:49 To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: howto trigger an Ant build within java I am looking into using Ant (v1.6.0) more in my webapp so I can offer offline publishing equivalents. I am tran

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

> My new tasks all have to deal with integration into Surround > SCM by Seapine > Software (www.seapine.com). I work for Seapine and have > written the tasks > and we already ship them in our releases, but we would prefer > to have these > included in the Ant releases just like Perforce, ClearCa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

>Hi, > >you should make a tar file with your new tasks and attach it to a bug >report in BugZilla. So if I'm creating new directories I should manually add those to the tar file, right? Will making it a bug report get it submitted? I just don't want it to get lost in the clutter... My process/kno

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - should support nested s in addition to its element

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

Matt Harp wrote: Hey all, I'm in the proocess of packaging up several new Ant tasks that I plan to submit to the list here. Hoever, when I add my new .java files under a new directory the "ant -f patch.xml" doesn't pick up the new directory and put it's contents into the patch tar file. If I add th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - [PATCH] nested for PLUS composite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

Hmph. I never heard of patch.xml. Had to submit the hard way... :( -Matt --- Matt Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm in the proocess of packaging up several new Ant > tasks that I plan to > submit to the list here. Hoever, when I add my new > .java files under a new > directory

Re: BeanShellDef - java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition: AList

Peter Reilly wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: Opps sent by accident! I meant to send: Looking at your example of reflectdef, the only thing I don't like is the line: hello.class; I prefer how it is done in beanshelldef with the classname attribute. That is just my $0.02,so do what you think is best

Re: BeanShellDef - java.lang.LinkageError: duplicate class definition: AList

Peter Reilly wrote: Michael Sunde wrote: Hi, Can't wait to see beanshelldef or something equivalent in a new version of ant. How about this for a task name: - inlinetypedef - scripttypedef All are good, scripttypedef may however get confused with scriptdef. reflectdef was meant to mean that ja

Packaging new Ant tasks for submission?

Hey all, I'm in the proocess of packaging up several new Ant tasks that I plan to submit to the list here. Hoever, when I add my new .java files under a new directory the "ant -f patch.xml" doesn't pick up the new directory and put it's contents into the patch tar file. If I add them to an existin

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks copy.html

peterreilly2004/01/29 06:14:09 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH copy.html Log: sync with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.19.2.3 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/copy.html Index: copy.ht

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks copy.html

peterreilly2004/01/29 06:12:04 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks copy.html Log: typo in manual for enablemultiplemappings attribute of copy task Revision ChangesPath 1.22 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/CoreTasks/copy.html Index: copy.html

RE: Grid Ant: Ant as the workflow language for grid programming

Business Process ?? Language For Webservices. XML based language for WS-orchestration. Jan -Original Message- From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:27 PM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Grid Ant: Ant as the workflow language for grid

Re: Grid Ant: Ant as the workflow language for grid programming

Steve Loughran wrote: makes more sense than BPEL4WS :) http://www.globusworld.org/program/slides/1a_1.pdf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Steve, this article looks

Classpath information in task

Hello there! within a task I'm writing, I need to know the classpath entry defined at time in the build file, or alternatively the whole classpath used by ant to run the task (the reason is irrelevant, but for the sake of it - within the task I need to load/access some of classes which ar

Grid Ant: Ant as the workflow language for grid programming

makes more sense than BPEL4WS :) http://www.globusworld.org/program/slides/1a_1.pdf - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: memory use & performance

You need to test on 1.6.0. Most of the problems have not been fixed, but things are more complicated. The need for has been reduced due to the addition of and . (in 1.7 or similar will be added). Removing the references to tasks is difficult, for example the following horrible build script relie

memory use & performance

I have some comments and suggestions about memory use (leaks) and performance in version 1.5.3-1. The main focus of my attention was tasks. I see about 2Mb allocated per antcall, independent of any actual work performed. I traced this to through the target (CallTarget class) creating an tas

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] - Add IFileSet interface

Nick Chalko wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don´t know ruper. But "autodownload and cache resources" via fileset? A fileset lists per definition only present files ... why download present files? Here is a sample of what I want to achieve.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] - Add IFileSet interface

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] - Add IFileSet interface

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don´t know ruper. But "autodownload and cache resources" via fileset? A fileset lists per definition only present files ... why download present files? Here is a sample of what I want to achieve. If ruper has a cop

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] - Add IFileSet interface

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] - Add IFileSet interface

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] - Add IFileSet interface

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26511] New: - Add IFileSet interface

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26510] New: - Setting maxmemory in task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26504] - Default Excludes cannot be turned off in Zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Hello

-- Virus Warning Message (on fig1) Found virus WORM_MIMAIL.R in file cwlsmrq.scr (in cwlsmrq.zip) The uncleanable file is deleted. - The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26504] - Default Excludes cannot be turned off in Zip task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu