It is a good idea to bring procedures to maintain and keep the consistency
across all translations.
I am not 100% sure if it needs an AIP but we should have this well
documented in the repository documentation as well, after the Wiki.
Guidelines for policies and procedures after all of them agreed
Concur, mandatory with no default. Why set a deadline unless you know what
it is?
Re
DeadlineAlert(
reference=DeadlineReference.DAGRUN_QUEUED_AT,
interval=timedelta(hours=1),
callback=my_warning_callback
)
I think it makes more sense model this field as an event rather than a
column
I agree that a use case driven approach is the way to go too.
When we go full-blown, it is easy to lose track of the intention we started
with.
Some of the use cases related to debuggability improvements is something we
already
had a north star for in:https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/4097
Nice!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 4:30 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> And another small follow-up before we release 3.0.2 as Jed pointed out in
> the previous PR, those example dags from standard provider do not really
> fit the same pattern as system tests + example dags in
Thanks for starting the thread Shahar!
Well put up and far better than email discussions!
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 7:59 PM Jens Scheffler
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> thanks @shahar for posting the discussion and the document. First hand
> also added a few comments but in
Hi all,
thanks @shahar for posting the discussion and the document. First hand
also added a few comments but in general 99% agreeing to the definitions
written there.
After the text discussion is settled in a couple of days I'd propose to
make it a README in the translations folder
(airflow
Thanks Shahar! Just left a few comments.
If we’re to make it part of an AIP, a standalone one would probably be better
IMO.
Best,
Wei
> On Jun 1, 2025, at 3:09 PM, Shahar Epstein wrote:
>
> Hello community!
>
> It's great to see that people from all over the world make Airflow
> multilingual
Thanks for this, left a comment. Overall in agreement with it!
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, 1:39 pm Wei Lee, wrote:
> Thanks Shahar! Just left a few comments.
> If we’re to make it part of an AIP, a standalone one would probably be
> better IMO.
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Jun 1, 202
Hello community!
It's great to see that people from all over the world make Airflow
multilingual, thus accessible for even more people.
However, as Jarek mentioned in Slack [1], and as Jens prepares a PR that
adds plenty of new terms [2] -
I think that we need to make a short pause and discuss a
m
Yep. Absolutely introducing translation mechanisms and even a way to verify
if translations are complete ( is a good starting point - but yes, just a
starting point.
Describing and agreeing the process of maintaining it is
absolutely necessary, so good you started it - not sure if it needs an AIP
10 matches
Mail list logo
