Thanks for the quick reply! And sorry to see that this bug was left
lingering for so long.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
http
I can confirm that M-x xterm in emacs24 sets TERM to eterm-color when
launched out of the box on Ubuntu 15.04. (In the regular terminal, it's
simply xterm.)
Whether this should be fixed in the packaging (make it not set eterm-
color) or dependencies (pull in ncurses-term) is an open question,
thou
As of the current Emacs sources, https://github.com/emacs-
mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/term.el#L1472 contains
(defvar term-term-name "eterm-color"
so there really is an explicit setting in the upstream sources which
hardcodes this. With that, I guess I agree that emacs24 should
"Suggests: nc
Forwarded upstream; https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790402
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #790402
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790402
** Also affects: emacs24 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790402
Importance: U
(Sorry, where I wrote xterm, I meant M-x term!)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285864
Title:
Missing dependency: emacs does not pull any package providing
/usr/shar
"Confirmed" flag was lost in the ping-pong when the tag was moved from
unity (Ubuntu) -> hud (Ubuntu) and promptly there flagged as Invalid.
If the hud owner's comment is correct, the unity task is the one where
it should remain Confirmed.
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confir
or something? For lack of repeatability in
other applications, I am assuming this is a bug in evince, but I could
of course be wrong.
I am running dual monitors, the screen geometry as reported by xwininfo
-root is 3840x1080.
era@precise$ lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS
Please clarify: if you used apt-build to install emacs23, which version
did you build and install? Do you have a transcript of the build? What
does dpkg -l emacs23 print?
Could you please also add build information about emacs-jabber (apt-
cache policy emacs-jabber if you installed by regular me
The trivial fix is to fail gracefully if the user cannot read this log
file. It should hardly prevent you from reporting bugs!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799240
Titl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770682 alleges that setting
NSS_SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV=0 globally is a security problem. As an
alternative, what I did was this:
Create the following file in /tmp/pidgin
#!/bin/sh
NSS_SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV=0 exec /usr/bin/pidgin "$@"
Then run the following com
I believe it was removed.
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/tramp/ChangeLog?root=tramp&r1=1.194&r2=1.195
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041474
Title:
TRAMP should kn
Did you add this to your personal .bashrc or to something like
/etc/profile (system-wide)? Your personal environment should certainly
be sanitized away if you install packages using sudo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to e
** Package changed: emacsen-common (Ubuntu) => xemacs21 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacsen-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074688
Title:
emacsen failed to install on upgrade to Kubuntu 1
See also related bug LP #1287130
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042040
Title:
debian CA not shipped in firefox
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Bug
Public bug reported:
You need a secret extra option if you want to run the Firefox profile
manager.
Steps to repro:
bash$ firefox -ProfileManager &
Expected outcome:
Profile manager dialog box
Actual outcome:
New Firefox browser window in your current default profile
Workaround:
bash$ fire
** Description changed:
You need a secret extra option if you want to run the Firefox profile
manager.
Steps to repro:
bash$ firefox -ProfileManager &
Expected outcome:
- Profile manager dialog box
+ New Firefox instance displaying the Profile Manager dialog box
Actual o
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356250 has a patch
which was apparently once applied to Ubuntu's firefox to fix this
precise issue. The old bug is LP bug #31746. It was closed as Won't Fix
for unclear reasons many years ago.
(I tried to link the Debian bug here as "also affects d
Public bug reported:
I use Thunderbird in a mainly Outlook-dominated organization. Since a
while back (after I installed XUbuntu 12.04? After the organization
upgraded to Outlook 2013?) I no longer see any indication when emails I
receive actually contain an invitation. I have multiple times re
For what it's worth, installing Lightning turned out to be a fairly good
workaround. It certainly displays the invitations in a readableformat
in the message pane.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
ht
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Quoting the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz:
> Install emacsen-common for xemacs21
> emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor xemacs21
>
> WARNING:
> Couldn't find obvious defaults for:
> data-
Lintian has a check for this since 2009. I would be tempted to close
the bug against Ubuntu emacs23 but for the time being, I simply marked
it as Confirmed, based on the number of reported (and now fixed) tasks
for other packages.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
*
Oh, the Lintian change is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535566
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552954
Title:
"can't find the info directory"
Status
** Also affects: emacs
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: emacs
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786698
Title:
It seems that either xemacs21 or emacsen-common is broken on your
system. If you still have this problem, can you remove and reinstall
emacsen-common and see if that helps? If removing xemacs21 from your
system altogether is acceptable, try that too.
I am setting the Status of this bug report to
Changing to Invalid as per latest reply. It looks like a duplicate of
the existing emacsen-common / xemacs21 bugs but if something new and
interesting comes up, feel free to reopen.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification becaus
I marked this as "affects me too", not because it particularly affects
me, but because it is clearly a code improvement -- provided the locale-
specific format-time-string parameters are substituted with locale-
independent constructs (in particular, %b expands to the locale's
abbreviated month nam
For example, auctex has "Depends: emacs23 | emacs24 | emacs-snapshot" --
I believe precisely to *support* users who want to be able to use emacs-
snapshot instead of one of the regular emacsen, but without forcing
anyone to give up the version they already have. This dependency is
resolved when on
However, the bug is not in emacs23, but in the packages which declare a
dependency on a nonexistent package. I'm marking this as Incomplete
because it needs to be split up into tasks for the packages which need a
change.
("Tasks" are the items which show up on a yellow background at the top
of th
Public bug reported:
I have two instances of Firefox running with different extensions,
different default window size, different preferences, etc.
I have found that when Firefox requires a restart (such as when the
Ubuntu Firefox package receives an upgrade, or when I have installed an
extension
The URL no longer works. Without additional details, there is no
meaningful way to analyze this bug any longer.
Feel free to reopen if you can add detailed repro steps.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
The URL no longer works. Without additional details, there is no
meaningful way to analyze this bug any longer.
Feel free to reopen if you can add detailed repro steps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
As per the latest comment in the upstream bug, this was already fixed in
upstream Emacs 23 in 2011.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697412
Title:
Emacs won't start, com
For what it's worth, here is the actual fix:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=918729edc787e5566f1e2aa1e41346084ec2b164
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
This would have been fixed when Ubuntu synced to Emacs 23.3 but I don't
have an environment where I can test that it is now fixed. Could
somebody please verify that the fix works with Emacs >= 23.3 on Ubuntu
with a font with a name like that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Trivially reproduced out of the box on emacs24.
era@trvsty:~$ apt-cache policy emacs24
emacs24:
Installed: 24.3+1-2ubuntu1
Candidate: 24.3+1-2ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 24.3+1-2ubuntu1 0
500 http://fi.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg
Public bug reported:
Calendar support disappeared from my Thunderbird when I did a dist-
upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04.
This would work if there was a known replacement for the old "lightning-
extension" package.
Please add "Provides: lightning-extension" to facilitate transitions
going forward.
Based on earlier suggestions, I worked around this by changing the
keybinding to space. The dialog to change this is not
entirely intuitive; you have to click the [...] button next to the
current binding.
For the record, Xubuntu 14.04 and ibus 1.5.5-1ubuntu3
--
You received this bug notificatio
I see emacs24-dbg in 14.04, does that mean "Fix Released" or am I
missing something here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100350
Title:
emacs24 has no dbg package
Sta
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1278569 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278569
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1278569
ibus breaks emacs and eclipse control-space keybinding
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Description changed:
+ This is "Won't Fix" because it is the symptom of a user error.
+
+ As indicated repeatedly in the comments below, you should not use "sudo
+ gedit" (or if you do, you should be able to live with this error
+ message).
+
+ The proper way to run a GUI tool with elevated p
** Also affects: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251176
Title:
Can't type accented characters anymore: is
I get this on Xubuntu after dist-upgrade from 12.04 to 14.04 and
subsequently installing emacs24.
I can confirm the "XMODIFIERS= emacs" workaround. As in #5, loading
iso-transl does not seem to offer any remedy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
LP #575084 seems related.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251176
Title:
Can't type accented characters anymore: is undefined
Status in Emacs-snapshot for ubuntu:
T
If I understand your bug report correctly, you are not using emacs24 as
shipped by Ubuntu. Is there something we can fix in Ubuntu or should
this be converted into a question?
New => Incomplete
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notifica
Marking as not a bug as suggested by OP's latest comment.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1364381
Title:
Looks like https://github.com/szermatt/emacs-bash-completion/issues/5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1370449
Title:
emacs bash tab-completion doesn't work for commands
bash-completion is not a feature which ships with emacs24. Where did
you obtain this package? You should probably report this bug to them
instead.
If you can suggest something to fix in emacs24 as shipped by Ubuntu,
please update your bug report and change its Status back to New.
Thanks.
** Cha
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100350
Title:
emacs24 has no dbg package
Status in “emacs24” pa
Is this still reproducible on 14.04? At least on Xubuntu, I do not see
this behavior.
** Changed in: emacs24 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs24 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Was apparently assigned to the wrong package because #778445.
** Package changed: chromium (Ubuntu) => chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Was apparently assigned to the wrong package because #778445
** Package changed: chromium (Ubuntu) => chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Gabe Gorelick (gabegorelick) wrote on 2011-05-08:
> it has to point to chromium-bsu so that it doesn't break any existing
> packages that depend on it
As easily revealed by "apt-cache rdepends chromum", there are none.
> chromium is now only in dapper and hardy, so as soon as those reach
end of
Related bug LP #493766 is now "Fix Released" in Debian.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs23/+bug/493766
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753534
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #753534
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753534
** Also affect
Public bug reported:
When I visit https://alioth.debian.org/ in Firefox, I get the familiar
warning dialog:
This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to alioth.debian.org, but we
can't
confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try
Why was this filed against command-not-found? Please follow up with a
rationale. In the meantime, I'm adding a task for the gnome-terminal
which to the best of my understanding is also the terminal in Unity.
Unfortunately, the link to Ubuntu Forums is broken. Could you please
fill in the inform
http://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/12308/recover-a-removed-page-in-
order-to-investigate-a-bug-report/ addresses the broken link, but
apparently, it is simply a duplicate of this bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Quoting the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz:
> ecb-common-browser.el:47:1:Error: Failed to find version for newly installed
> cedet
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
U
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Sorry, make that bug #466531.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051533
Title:
p
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> In toplevel form:
> ecb-advice-test.el:46:1:Error: Failed to find version for newly installed
> cogre
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping
The attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt indicates a problem while removing
emacs23. Your report states that installing it is not possible, either.
The DpkgTerminalLog.txt seems truncated; do you have older versions of
this file /var/log/dpkg/term.log.0 term.log.1.gz etc which you could
upload? Or better
Confirmed; trivially reproducible (though you have to be somewhat
familiar with the Info reader to know how to navigate; press Enter on a
link etc).
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
I should also note that (emacs.gz)Minibuffer works for me. But
obviously, the hyperlinks between officially packaged documents should
work without manual editing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https:/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
Huh? It depends on emacsen, not emacsen-common.
** Changed in: emacs-goodies-el (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs-goodies-el in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105569
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531 , so it is being marked as such. Please look
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
"Affects me too" reporters: Please check your /var/log/dist-
upgrade/term.log (if you did a dist-upgrade) or /var/log/apt/term.log.
The error message about emacs23 is misleading and uninformative; you
have to
While the error message is unsettling, the actual error message looks
more like just a warning. Is your system operational and usable? Do
you have any comments on how to reproduce this problem?
** Changed in: emacsen-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug not
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #789706, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #789706, so is being marked as such. Pleas
The dictionaries-common postinst script wants to compile for xemacs21,
which is not found. This points to a possible problem with your
xemacs21 installation, but nothing is visible from the logs. What is
the status of your xemacs21 installation? If you remove it, are you
able to proceed with the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #466531, so is being marked as such. Pleas
Quoting the attached VarLogDistupgradeTermLog.gz:
> install/dictionaries-common: Byte-compiling for emacsen flavour emacs23
> Wrote /usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp/dictionaries-common/debian-ispell.elc
> >>Error occurred processing ispell.el: error (("IO error reading
> >>/usr/share/emacs23/site-lisp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Closing as Invalid as per latest comment.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/991526
Title:
package emacs23-n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 466531
ecb: incompatible with emacs23, breaks installation / upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, whic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> install/dictionaries-common: Byte-compiling for emacsen flavour emacs23
> Unsuitable coding system for keyboard: vietnamese-tcvn-unix
> emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/dictionaries-common
> emacs23 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-commo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466531 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466531
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #466531, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Quoting the attached DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
> E: Could not get lock /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (11: Resource temporarily
> unavailable)
> E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), is another
> process using it?
Looks like you had multiple APT clients running at the same time.
The error log seems to indicate speechd-el as the culprit. Reassigning.
In the meantime, if you could try to uninstall speechd-el and then
finish the emacs23-lucid install, and follow up here with the results,
that would be very useful. Thanks in advance!
** Package changed: emacs23 (Ubuntu) =>
Public bug reported:
The dialog box I get for this does not allow me to select an item by
clicking on it.
zenity --list --text "Pick an Item" --radiolist --column "" --column
"Item" TRUE One FALSE Two FALSE Three FALSE Four
If I want to select the item "Two", I cannot click on the text label
"Tw
Public bug reported:
When displaying a particular message, I get this warning dialog:
[ ] <- // sic, no window title
An error occurred while loading or saving
configuration information for thunderbird. Some
of your configuration settings may not work
properly.
[Details]
[OK]
Clic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 411358 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411358
On closer examination, this is indeed exactly the same problem as bug
#411358.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 411358
Thunderbird2 gconf gmt problem 'Bad key or directory name' because of pl
Looks like at least part of the problem is due to xemacs21, not emacs23.
If you remove xemacs21 temporarily (or permanently, for all I care), are
you able to resolve the problem? See also LP bug# #789706.
I am setting the Status of this bug report to Incomplete to mark it as
pending on your input
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 789706 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789706
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #789706, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Thanks for the update.
The wildcard move of the prerm scripts looks pretty dangerous, are you
sure it's really necessary? At least using, as it were, a less "wild"
wildcard would be recommended. On my system, for example, em* would
match empathy as well as emacs. So I'd say if you really can't
Resisting the temptation to mark this as a duplicate of bug #789706. I
think it probably is a duplicate, but since several people are signing
up for this particular bug, let's keep it open for a little whiĺe
longer.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You r
cscope is a red herring; the bug, as you can see from the bug report, is
in xemacs21. The original reporter was installing cscope when the bug
was discovered.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bug
@Josy: Alas, the output from dpkg -l is truncated to make room for the
version number and short description. In the general case, you can use
something like COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l whatever; but in this particular
case, the packages you want to remove are the ones you have installed in
/var/lib/dpkb/in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
Reassigning to xemacs21.
** Package changed: emacs23 (Ubuntu) => xemacs21 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacs23 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Title:
emacs depencies broken after upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069209 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069209
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1069209, so is being marked as such. Pl
@jwatt What's this about a mass bug change? The link is to an
uninformative routine comment on an unrelated bug report, and googling
for similar comments only brings up this single bug report. Was this a
failed test for an upcoming actual mass bug change? Or can you explain
what it means with a cor
Do you mean this is a new way to repro? Which replaces the old? (For
all versions, or just the latest one you tried?)
If we are to finally report this upstream, can you provide a brief use
case to assess the priority of this? If it's just an academic
curiosity, I don't really see the point; but
Possible duplicate of #949369
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacsen-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361715
Title:
package emacsen-common 2.0.8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-
Sorry, I somehow posted that to the wrong bug!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to emacsen-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361715
Title:
package emacsen-common 2.0.8 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
If you understand what's wrong could you briefly summarize? If not, a
quick and dirty translation of the most relevant error messages would
help more people try to analyze what happened. Your latest comment
sounds vaguely like this is a duplicate of an existing issue; have you
checked for duplicate
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
