Hello Philip, or anyone else affected,
Accepted policykit-1 into oracular-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/124-2ubuntu1.24.10.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected,
Accepted policykit-1 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/124-2ubuntu1.24.04.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Rejected Noble's ceph SRU for this [1] as it is based on RC2, and a
concurrent upload with a newer/Release version existed and has been
accepted (bug 2081781), thus should address this too.
[1]
Version: 19.2.0~rc2-0ubuntu0.24.04.2
Distribution: noble
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers
Apparently, this is still waiting on actions to comment #5.
If that is not the case (or once it is no longer the case), please clarify in a
comment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libmbim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Hi Frank Heimes,
Comment #67:
> A new upload of the s390-tools package always also requires an upload of the
> s390-tools-signed package with the same version as well.
> I've attached the debdiff for it here...
Thanks for that.
The upload contains removals of d/{changelog,control}.orig which ar
Just for doc purposes,
ubuntu-meta's server-minimal binary package dependencies no longer list
`ssh-import-id` [1, 2], as expected.
$ wget -q
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/ubuntu-server-minimal_1.481.{2,3}_amd64.deb
$ debdiff ubuntu-server-minimal_1.481.{2,3}_amd64.deb
Fil
The updates look good, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221
Title:
Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Hi Jeremy,
This looks mostly good, AFAICT.
Could you please complete the SRU bug template by adding the section
'Where problems could occur' / 'Regression potential'? [1]
And although the 'Test Case' is feasible to understand, based on the 'Impact'
section, it would be nice to have a 'functiona
I tested this with a local package build and local repo in a mantic container,
doing an `apt --dry-run dist-upgrade` without/with that repo (w/ noble apt
sources list),
and manually download/run noble's release upgrader without/with that repo.
The behavior is the same (ie, no regressions) as expe
Verification done on mantic-proposed.
On arm64 with ubuntu-desktop-minimal installed,
running do-release-upgrade from lunar to mantic
(with mantic-proposed enabled and pinning setup)
does install `protection-domain-mapper` and
`qrtr-tools` (`flash-kernel` already installed).
Test Steps:
---
Pa
Hi Rico,
Thanks for the clarifications!
> 1) 2) 3) 6) are packaging bugs regarding Java support
> Those are needed to allow Java support to be disabled on specific archs if
> needed.
> Fortunately this wasn't required yet while the already applied mitigations to
> the bridgetests still are suff
Hi Rico,
Thanks for the nice and detailed SRU template, and all the testing.
While looking at this, particularly the changes in the packaging,
there are a few points that seem to warrant clarification, since
are apparently not related/supporting the upstream bug fixes, or
are not justified as to
Verification (synthetic) of the XDG_SESSION_TYPE fix in Mantic:
$ lsb_release -cs
No LSB modules are available.
mantic
The packages are downloaded from Launchpad librarian
since previous versions are not available in archive.
Before the fix (reverted) // 1:23.10.12
---
T
Summary for Mantic SRUs.
There are 3 LP bugs combined in mantic-proposed
(list sorted by package version so it's helpful).
1) Bug 2034986, used twice,
1A) First for 1:23.10.9, for 'fix v1':
* Temporary font for Ubuntu MATE (LP: #2034986)
It's released to mantic-updates with 1:23.10.10 (
Happy to (in addition to comment #19) confirm that qpdf + libqpdf29 from
noble-release and mantic/lunar-proposed fix the issue.
noble:
---
$ lsb_release -cs
No LSB modules are available.
noble
$ wget -q https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf/files/12885974/018.pdf
Marking Noble as Fix Released (11.6.3-1).
$ git log --oneline -1 pkg/ubuntu/noble | cat
03517080d29d 11.6.3-1 (patches unapplied)
$ git show pkg/ubuntu/noble -- libqpdf/QPDFTokenizer.cc
** Changed in: qpdf (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notific
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039328
Title:
Update ubuntu-meta with promotion
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* ubuntu-seeds were changed since last meta update
* to ensure correct upgrades; regenerate ubuntu-meta with contents / changes
done before release
[ Test Plan ]
* Check that arm64 upgrades of ubuntu-desktop-minimal from lunar to
mantic i
Updated regression potential with theoretical issues, and other info
with status in main for protection-domain-mapper and qrtr.
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
- * ubuntu-seeds were changed since last meta update
- * to ensure correct upgrades; regenerate ubuntu-meta with contents / cha
(unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039328
Title:
Update ubuntu-meta with promotions done between last ubuntu-meta bu
Marking Kinetic as Won't Fix (release close to EOL, as mentioned in an
email thread).
** Also affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
** Tags added: se-sponsor-dgadomski
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gjs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974293
Title:
gnome-shell crashed on logout with SIGSEGV in
js::gc::Cell::storeBuffer() from
js::gc
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Medium => Undecided
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assign
Hi Luka/@zapduke,
Can you test/verify bionic-proposed?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838152
Title:
gnome-shell freezes on notification arrival (fixed u
** Patch added: "lp1848210_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297502/+files/lp1848210_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups-filters in Ubuntu.
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: cups-filters (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: cups-filters (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: cups-filters (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: Mauricio
After discussing this with Eric (slashd) and Marc (mdeslaur),
it seems like the Breaks: approach is indeed the way to go.
Nonetheless, it doesn't warrant an USN notice (security-only),
which is the bit that could make Landscape (problem trigger)
to pick up the new ghostscript fix then update cups-
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
-(which is possible)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
+
+ * This is possible as Landscape does not consider the
+-security pocket (has both ghostscript/cups-filters)
+
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
- (which is possible; eg unattended-upgrade/landscape)
+(which is possible)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
-
- * Landscape and unattended-upgrade allows packages
-
The approach to fix/deliver this is under discussion for a bit.
We'll move forward once that's more clearly defined.
** Patch removed: "lp1848210_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297380/+files/lp1848210_bionic.debdiff
** Patch rem
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
- (which is possible, including via Landscape tooling)
+ (which is possible; eg unattended-upgrade/landscape)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
- * Landscape allows pac
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
(which is possible, including via Landscape tooling)
users may hit errors printing PDF files (LP#1828401).
* Landscape allows packages updates to USN-only thus
ghostscript is updated
** Patch added: "lp1848210_xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297381/+files/lp1848210_xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
h
Test packages used for verification in comments #1 and #2
built successfully on all architectures, ppa:mfo/sf246942 [1].
[1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/sf246942
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript
** Patch added: "lp1848210_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/1848210/+attachment/5297380/+files/lp1848210_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
h
Testing on Xenial
---
Files)
$ wget -O ppd-with-pdf-support.ppd
'http://www.openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=hl7x0&printer
=Brother-HL-1020&show=1'
$ wget -O dummy.pdf
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/resources/pdf/dummy.pdf
Test 0) Before updating ghostscript or cups-filt
Testing on Bionic
---
Files)
$ wget -O ppd-with-pdf-support.ppd
'http://www.openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=hl7x0&printer
=Brother-HL-1020&show=1'
$ wget -O dummy.pdf
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/resources/pdf/dummy.pdf
Test 0) Before updating ghostscript or cups-fil
** Description changed:
- Add a Breaks: relationship to cups-filter to prevent LP#1828401.
+ [Impact]
- Landscape allows packages updates to only USNs, so ghostscript
- can be updated to a version that breaks the older cups-filters.
+ * After an update of ghostscript but not cups-filters
+
** Summary changed:
- ghostscript: add Breaks: relationship to cups-filter
+ ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848210
Title:
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags added: sts
** Summary changed:
- ghostscript: add breaks relationship to cups-filter
+ ghostscript: add Breaks: relationship to cup
: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo
portance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo
Christian,
Thanks for handling this.
> But the more that are affected the more I think then general solution
in lightdm would be the right thing to do.
Yes, that's my interpretation too -- and it was my impression from the
beginning, with your report/analysis, as I couldn't find anything we
were
43 matches
Mail list logo
