Re: mesag3 <-> xlibmesa-gl / libgl1-mesa-dri <-> xlibmesa-dri / libglu1-mesa <-> libglu1-xorg

On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 22:00 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:07:46PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > Sorry, I've really just not had any time recently, and there are some > > things I wanted to clean up before I fired off to you (e.g. the

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r576 - trunk/debian

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:22 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > * Add Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers to (<< 2.6.13+0rc3-1.1) so that I guess that's >=, rather than <<. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r577 - trunk/debian

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:38 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > * Change Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers to not apply to non-linux > arches > > > Modified: trunk/debian/changelog > === > --- trunk/debian/chang

Re: X Strike Force Render SVN commit: r66 - in branches/HEAD: . autom4te.cache

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 19:47 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Added: >[...] >branches/HEAD/autom4te.cache/ >branches/HEAD/autom4te.cache/output.0 >branches/HEAD/autom4te.cache/requests >branches/HEAD/autom4te.cache/traces.0 >[...] autom4te.cache shouldn't

Re: Bug#326199: libgtk2.0-dev breaks pkg-config with unsatisfiable requirement

On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 13:22 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 06:42:15PM +0200, Fionn Behrens wrote: > > On Fr, 2005-09-02 at 18:13 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > > Le jeudi 01 septembre 2005 à 09:01 +0200, Fionn Behrens a écrit : > > > > Package: libgtk2.0-dev > > > > Vers

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r578 - branches/6.9/debian

On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 22:57 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Log: > * We no longer build or ship xlibs-dev \o/ Can we please do the same to xlibs-static-dev? libXfont and libfontcache don't need to be shipped, neither does libxf86config. The rest should be made shared as well

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r578 - branches/6.9/debian

On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 12:42 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 05:25:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 22:57 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > > wrote: > > > Log: > > > * We no longer build or ship xlibs-dev

Re: mesag3 <-> xlibmesa-gl / libgl1-mesa-dri <-> xlibmesa-dri / libglu1-mesa <-> libglu1-xorg

On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:04 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > Right. My solution for that was to split them into a separate > > mesa-utils source package, with a slightly hacked Makefile. They &g

Re: Processing of xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes

On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 21:50 -0700, Archive Administrator wrote: > xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes uploaded successfully to > localhost > along with the files: > [... lots of debs ...] > Greetings, > > Your Debian queue daemon Congratulations! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: Processing of xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 07:35 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:50:24PM -0700, Archive Administrator wrote: > > xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes uploaded successfully to > > localhost > > along with the files: > > xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN.dsc > > Was that a

Re: Gnome prevent windows to go over screen top

On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 13:41 +0200, Paolo Pantaleo wrote: > A in subject, when moving a window in Gnome the title bar of the > window canot go out of the screen going over the top of the screen. > > This is quite a big problem when using low res (800x600), since a lot > of windows are taller than 6

Bug#327179: replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf upon upgrading.

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:55 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > [please replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf] Where? Why? It's not even listed in xorg.conf anywhere. The DDX driver is i810. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Re: bug administratif... (administrativ bug found...)

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:22 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 01:52:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson / Debian Project > Leader wrote: > > The Debian Sarge release uses a program called "discover1" to discern what > > hardware is on the system, so I would encourage you to file a bug r

Re: bug administratif... (administrativ bug found...)

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:14 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 08 September 2005 12:22, Daniel Stone wrote: > > debian-installer does not use any version of discover in any way, shape > > or form. Perhaps you were thinking of hotplug? > > Hmm. D-I most certainly _does_

Bug#327179: replace i830 with i915 in xorg.conf upon upgrading.

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 13:36 +0300, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > [replace i810 with i915] There is no 'i915' driver. The driver is still called i810, even though it supports all i8xx and i9xx chipsets. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#327282: xserver-xorg: can't switch to virtual console with alt-ctl-f1

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 00:26 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > xserver-xfree86 allowed one to exit the xserver to a virtual console > using the alt-ctl-f1...f6 combinations. The new xserver-xorg does not > appear to allow this; this is very important should a window manager > get stuck, for example. >

Bug#327465: xserver-xorg: Freezes immediately after starting with radeon driver

tags 327465 + patch kthxbye On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 12:44 +0200, Vedran Furač wrote: > After starting I get black screen. I can't get back into linux console > with C+A+F1 and I have to do C+A+Del to reboot. > Top says (log from different computer using ssh) that Xorg is using 99% of > CPU. > > L

Re: 6.8 Freeze and 6.9

On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 20:21 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > I also plan on immediately importing 6.9rc1 when it's released. Daniel has > imported a bunch of our patches directly in to the main tree, so we can > happily chuck a few of them for rc1. At a certain point, I'm going to try > and make regul

Bug#327282: xserver-xorg: can't switch to virtual console with alt-ctl-f1

On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 21:07 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:36:53AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 00:26 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > xserver-xfree86 allowed one to exit the xserver to a virtual console > > >

Re: 6.8 Freeze and 6.9

On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 11:20 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:57:58AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 20:21 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > > I also plan on immediately importing 6.9rc1 when it's released. Daniel has > > >

Re: x libraries and powerpc/ppc64 biarch setup.

On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 21:11 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > I'm willing to implement biarch for etch, but definitely not for the 6.8 > series of packages. > > The 6.9 branch is technically open for development, but I still want to > keep a focus on the goal of shipping the modular tree with etch.

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r626 - trunk/debian

On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 08:55 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Change xserver-xorg and xserver-xorg-dbg's recommendation of "discover1" > to "discover | discover1". These packages' configure scripts detect both > utilities, and use whichever one is found, so there's no reason to c

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:22 -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: >* Don't reset all xserver-xorg debconf templates when "dpkg-reconfigure > -xserver-xorg" is called. (closes: #320241) > +xserver-xorg" is called. (closes: #320241, #318634) If this isn't done here, it needs

Bug#331213: please lower priority of display mode question

On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > As for reasonable defaults, I think the current default (1024x768, 800x600, > 640x480) is quite reasonable, but I would recommend using an empty list as > default instead. How can you generate a configuration file without a list of r

Bug#331288: xlibs: AltGr not working with Norwegian dvorak + nodeadkeys

On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 10:22:27PM +0200, Vegar Storvann wrote: > After upgrading xlibs I noticed I couldn't use AltGr+2 to type an @ > anymore. Further investigation showed me that adding the following line > to /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/dvorak at the end of xkb_symbols "basic" > (which had been rem

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:39:22PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:31:51PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > If this isn't done here, it needs to be done whereever autodetect_* is > > checked (you need to pull back from Ubuntu, as I've made a whole to

Input hotplugging et al (was: Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian)

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:07:05PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > I'd like to kill it one day, but not today. All the options out there are > pretty crap, so we only lose so much by keeping it around for now. Once I > get Debian caught up, I really want to start work on letting X > automagically cho

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r640 - trunk/debian

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:11:56PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 04 October 2005 04:56, Daniel Stone wrote: > > To be honest, I don't see the Debconf interface as being valuable. I > > don't think it provides anything over xorg.conf for the average user, > >

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r654 - trunk/debian

s. Thanks Daniel > Stone. Woah, you rock, thanks. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xorg-x11/experimental sparc FTBFS

On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:14:32AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > I just rebuilt the packages with the attached patch, and it worked > (well, up to the MANIFEST check). > New log at > > > So, I don't think it was a toolcha

Bug#324768: xserver-xorg: Add an XKBPATH environment variable to specify alternate XKB data location

On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > In order to ease migration from xlibs to xkeyboard-config, an option > is to install xkeyboard-config files under another directory, so > that xlibs and xkeyboard-config can be installed simultaneously. > The selection between xlibs a

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r664 - trunk/debian

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:44:59PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > I definitely do not want to remove the current Ubuntu stuff. I explicitly > left it in when I was auditing their packaging because I don't want to > actively work against sidegrades. A lot of people seem to like to mix and > match the

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r665 - trunk/debian

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:51:58PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > * Back out change from last revision that reset all debconf questions with > "autodetect" in their name no matter what. This is unnecessary and only > lead to annoyances. (closes: #332336) Just wrap it with

Bug#333921: priority of mouse template too low

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:24:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > The priority of mouse template (medium) is too low, and unsuitable for use > with a LiveCD: Since the /etc/init.d/xserver-xorg script intended for LiveCD > usage uses "-phigh" when configuring this package, mice won't be configured >

Bug#333960: config script should honour preseeded debconf value for keyboard/options

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:44:45PM +0200, Miroslav Kure wrote: > the config script sets debconf variable > xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/options without actually > checking for existing preseeded value and therefore overwrides it > headlessly. > > You can trigger this easily on new inst

Bug#333921: priority of mouse template too low

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 08:47:15AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 02:21:15AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > I don't think this template should be high unless the mouse cannot be > > detected. On Linux/(i386|amd64|powerpc), which, last I heard, amounted

Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:50:32PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > it just occurred to me that the X strike force might be a better place > to ask this: > > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear debian-legal people, > > Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It is quite odd that o

Re: Bug#333973: xserver-xorg: patch to enable DRI support for 9500 and newer cards

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 13:41, Sven Luther wrote: > > Michel, i don't see any libgl1-mesa-dri powerpc package in sid, any idea > > what > > the problem is ? Or did you give the wrong name ? There is a > > libgl1-mesa-dbg, > > and a me

Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:31:13PM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > Do you know which person we could contact among the X.org > >> people? > > > M

Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 02:24:03AM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The only copyright on these fonts is: Copyright (c) 1989, 1991 > > Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserv

Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:21:08PM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Right. As I said earlier, it's probably tied up somewhere deep > > within TOG: no-one still involved with X to

Adobe, PDF, and competition (was: Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources)

On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 04:31:18AM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > When Sebastian presented pdftex at Adobe, they had been amazed that > pdftex can do things they cannot do with their own tools (I suppose > that Hans Hagen provided some files). This was years ago, but > meanwhile Thanh provided m

Re: [tex-live] Re: License of fonts included in X.org sources

On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:08:39AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 03:57:15AM +0200, Reinhard Kotucha wrote: > > Yes. Can TOG be regarded as the legal successor of the X Consortium? > > > > From > > > >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/x-faq/part1/section-16.html > > > > > Here

Re: oprofile on Xorg HOWTO ?

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 09:45:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > So I've spent the past hour or two hammering away at this. Here's what I've > found: > > 1) The files all appear to be correctly compiled with -g in the build_tree > dir > 2) None of the files are stripped in this dir after the

Re: experimental Xorg 6.9 packages available at http://people.debian.org/~luther/xorg-x11-6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-1

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > BTW, what is the status of the mesa package ? Frank asked me to go ahead with > the NMU i proposed to do, to fix the FTBFS problem, but i heard someone is > working on mesa 6.4 packages. I'm currently working on Mesa 6.4 packages. Hav

Re: experimental Xorg 6.9 packages available at http://people.debian.org/~luther/xorg-x11-6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-1

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:16:59PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:12:51AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:05:58AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > BTW, what is the status of the mesa package ? Frank asked me to go ahead > >

Re: questions about branches/modular

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:23:45AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I tried to build part of the x11proto and lib packages from svn, and I > have a few questions. > - x11proto-xext-dev depends on libxi-dev; libxi build-depends on > libx11-dev; libx11 build-depends on x11proto-xext-dev. This creates

Bug#338047: xlibmesa-dri in experimental is missing Savage 3D driver, savage_dri.so

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 06:30:10PM +0100, Samuli Suominen wrote: > It does, in Unstables X.org version 6.8.2 but this version doesn't support > Savage DRI in upstream, and driver is backported from HEAD. I tried it, > it created /dev/dri/card0 but nothing in Xorg.0.log about direct rendering, > als

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

reassign 338715 nvidia-glx kthxbye On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 02:17:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > The xserver-xorg package in experimental can't be installed on a system > where nvidia-glx is also installed: > > # dpkg -i ../xserver-xorg_6.8.99.901.dfsg.1-2.1_i386.deb > (Reading database ... 1

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 06:21:06AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:52:45PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Obviously, this is nvidia-glx's problem, not xorg's. > > The nvidia-glx package exists, and was here first. You don't get to say >

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:03:12PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > This has been an ongoing thing, I thought, and could be solved with a > dpkg-divert, rather than a conflicts line. Yes, as nvidia-glx already does for libGLcore. It hasn't updated its diversions for xserver-xorg yet, so it spuriously

Bug#338715: xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:21:32PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > Right, I was talking about having xserver-xorg do it as well. Let me > rephrase a bit: > > I believe the nvidia packages in debian are doing it right now because > they had to be coinstallable with xserver-xfree86. Since xorg is the

Re: xlibmesa Dead In 6.9?

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 04:39:30PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: >Well, it looks like 6.9 RC2 does not include Mesa in the tarball. Given > that, we may as well kill the xlibmesa packages with 6.9, in favor of the > work Marcelo and Michel have been doing. We may need daniels' NMU sooner > than I

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r872 - in branches/6.9/debian: . po scripts

On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 08:27:13PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > * Remove pclcomp from xbase-clients, since it ships with xprint. Thanks Ari > Pollak. Checking the licence on pclcomp can also be, er, enlightening. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Ging 0.1.0

On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:14:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Hassard, Stephen wrote: > > As far as I can tell from my Linux PCs, when no monitor frequencies are > > included, the display driver is queried for the info. I'm not sure what > > drivers this

Re: xlibmesa Dead In 6.9?

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:34:57AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In gmane.linux.debian.devel.x, you wrote: > >Another fun item of note is that Steve Langasek just gave me permission > > announce the death of xlibs-dev. They didn't want this earlier because of > > all the transitions going

Re: Processing of xorg-x11_6.8.99.902.dfsg.1-1_i386.changes

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:13:21PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > I don't know if all of you saw the RC2 release announcement on the X.org > list, but the final release is due in less than one month, with a code > freeze coming very soon. Hopefully we'll get permission to upload it to > unstable so

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r893 - trunk/debian

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:59:43PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Modified: >trunk/debian/changelog >trunk/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in > Log: > * Only reset autodetection questions on first install or reconfigure. > (closes: #332369, #332637, #334340). > > *** NOT

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile problem with plib

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 07:59:34PM -0500, Josh Babcock wrote: > looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to > libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib. > Thanks for the tip. > > For you Debian guys: > Package Installed PreviousNow > State > =

Bug#338715: marked as done (xserver-xorg: file conflict with nvidia-glx)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:18:26PM -0800, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Also to Sven, please realize there's a reason Debian has (or hasn't) or a > non-free section. If we really didn't care about anyone using non-free > software, non-free wouldn't exist in the first place. Maybe 30% of installs > m

Bug#342659: Found the problem

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:41:23PM +0100, Sjoerd Hemminga wrote: > The problem is that 028_loader_speed_hack.diff optimizes too much :) > > In xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/loader/loadmod.c, function > LoaderListDirs(), your patch removed all work on fp before > fp = LoaderGetCanonicalName(buf, N

Re: Bug#343407: marked as done (xlibs-static-dev: missing file: /usr/include/X11/Xauth.h)

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:53:07AM +0100, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: > El jueves, 15 de diciembre de 2005 03:48, Debian Bug Tracking System escribi?: > [...] > > From: Eugene Konev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > > > > apt-get install libxau-dev > > Sorry, Eugene. I

Bug#326637: Should /etc/X11/xkb/* be conffiles at all?

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote: > I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is > asking for a lot of confirmations to override with new maintainer's > version from anyone trying to upgrade from one version to another (for > example Sarge to E

Bug#326637: Should /etc/X11/xkb/* be conffiles at all?

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:03:19AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 08:28:41PM +0100, J??r??me Warnier wrote: > > > I wonder if those files should really be conffiles at all, as it is > > > asking for a lot of confirm

Bug#326637: Should /etc/X11/xkb/* be conffiles at all?

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:35:58AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > > Users change keybindings. > > > > Daniel, running with an entirely custom keymap > > Sure!! > > So you keep the standard keybinding in /usr and your one liners > ke

Bug#326637: Should /etc/X11/xkb/* be conffiles at all?

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:01:48AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > Maybe a solution is to have files installed by packages under a > given directory $dir1 (under /usr?), sysadmins can add/customize files > under /etc, and a magic command run after editing /etc files would merge > /etc and $dir1 into

Bug#326637: Should /etc/X11/xkb/* be conffiles at all?

On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:35:58AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So you keep the standard keybinding in /usr and your one liners > keybinding modifications in /etc. This way when there's a change in > upstream keybindings you don't even have to merge them manually. > (This will probably need so

XKB layouts on the console (was: Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r988 - trunk/debian)

On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 09:55:04AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > Please note also that some packages depend on XKB data. For instance, > Anton Zinoviev wrote a nice program to use XKB layouts to replace > console layouts. Of course, this program could be useful without X. > If XKB data are shipped

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r991 - trunk/debian

On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 02:57:21AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > thanks for your prompt reply. IMO the best solution is to move XKB data > files into their own package. Maybe xkbdata is a good candidate for now, > since it looks like this is the component name for X.org 7.0 (do not > hesitate to

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1051 - tags

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from > Marcelo?), but I still don't like the package naming as currently in > xorg SVN. I think something like libgl1-mesa-(sw)x11 would be more > accurate than libgl1-mesa

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:32:36PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > d-i already installs discover1 on all systems, and it's probably best to > continue to do so instead of changing the hardware detection programs > that are installed depending on whether the user installs X or not. > > However, this does

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:37:46AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected monitor, and > allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor. We may consider > using it already in g-i, since it would allow to set the framebuffer size or >

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 17 January 2006 11:37, Sven Luther wrote: > > xresprobe is a very nice tool, it will investigate the connected > > monitor, and allow you to set the resolutions supported by the monitor. > > Despite the danger of stating the o

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:22:06AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Um, neither does xserver-xorg.{config,postinst,templates}. So there's > >> not much point until those get fixed. I've been meaning to do it, but > >> never got around to it. (Don't cou

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:25:47PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Full ack in the context of X configuration. > But, in the context of potential use of xresprobe for autodetection when > booting the (graphical) installer (as Sven hinted at), non DCC compliant > hardware also needs to be supported. xr

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:02:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 11:55:49AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > The description also says it only works on i386 (including AMD64 I > > presume) and ppc. > > Well, the ppc uses the OF device-tree, and if this doesn't work falls back to

Re: [pkgsel] Add xresprobe, discover and laptop detect for hw detection

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:09:55PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Yes, but you don't want to depend on accelerated framebuffer drivers, > > particularly if you want to use accelerated X. In addition, most of t

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1051 - tags

On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:44:24PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > I see. Keeping the DRI drivers in their own package would probably be > > nice, how about libgl1-mesa-glx for libGL and libgl1-mesa-dri for the > > drivers? > > For w

Bug#348830: xserver-xorg: radeon driver rejects all resolutions (strange clock range) and have to exit

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:53:57AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote: > As you see from the included files, I got a strange "clock range" and then > all video modes were rejected and the xserver gave up. > > xserver-xorg version 6.8.2 did not do this. Could you please try without the IsolateDevice and I

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1090 - branches/modular/driver/xf86-input-mouse-X11R7.0-1.0.3.1/debian

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:51:46PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Fill in copyright information I think the -kbd package you would've got probably has the same issue; I updated that a while back. *cough* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Bug#349135: Xserver: Fails to start x windows

On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:07:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Well, if you had happened to file this bug against the xserver-xfree86 > package, which is probably where the real error lies, reportbug would have > automatically included a good deal more configuration info for you that > would hel

Bug#349318: libxft-dev: please do not export unnecessary libraries in xft.pc

tags 349318 + fixed-upstream On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:44:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > So, I suppose most of you have read > about > problems with packages depending on libraries that they don't use, > particularly as re

Bug#349557: i810.4x.gz: mention pros and cons of each option

On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 12:50:19AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Say "must be": > > some cases where it must enabled for the correct > > Mention what DDC and other acronyms mean. > > $ grep clock /usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg/README.i810 >o Fully programmable clock supported. > however nothing m

Bug#349586: evdev locks my machine

On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:40:09AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Sorry, but this is not a dup. #347681 talks about typos > in xorg.conf, i.e. something that can be fixed by somebody > with write permission to this file. > > This bug (#347681) is about something that can _not_ be > fixed by editing

Re: Modular in Experimental

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:20:29AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:09:40PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > Ok, status update: the common-packages are uploaded (xorg-common is in NEW) > > and tonight I uploaded the protocol headers, which are also sitting in NEW. > > Tomorro

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1114 - branches/modular/lib/libXcursor-X11R7.0-1.1.5.2/debian

AIL PROTECTED]>, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Nusinow <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > -Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.12), debhelper (>= 4.0.0), x11proto-core-dev (>= > 7.0.1-1), libx11-dev (>= 1:0.9.2-1), libxr

Re: evdev driver in xorg-x11 (6.9.0.dfsg.1-3)

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 05:03:52PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > i have here a system witch runs two Xservers, has two heads with > two displays, two keyboards and two mice. > > I used to use the evdev driver and identified my devices like > this: > Option "Dev Name" "ELEC

Re: Tellico FTBS, libkcal.la references libXft.la which does not exist anymore

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 01:14:14AM +, Regis Boudin wrote: > Trying to build a snapshot of tellico, it FTBS because of a > missing /usr/lib/libXft.la file. I tried to rebuild the latest version > of tellico with pbuilder, which also failed with the same error. > > All the .la files from the kde

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1125 - in branches/modular/data/xkbdata-X11R7.0-1.0.1: . debian

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 10:05:13PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > +Package: xkbdata > +Architecture: all > +Depends: ${misc:Depends} > +Conflicts: xlibs-data (<< 6.8.2-35), xkb-data > +Replaces: xlibs-data (<< 6.8.2-35), xkb-data > +Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 1:1.0.0-1) > +De

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1125 - in branches/modular/data/xkbdata-X11R7.0-1.0.1: . debian

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:46:40PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > Yeah, that's what I was hoping we'd figure out. I just wanted to get this > in motion so we had something installable. keithp suggested we just ship > xkeyboad-config as the default and I'm totally fine with doing that and > naming th

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1125 - in branches/modular/data/xkbdata-X11R7.0-1.0.1: . debian

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 12:11:46AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:07:56PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:46:40PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > > Yeah, that's what I was hoping we'd figure out. I just wanted to ge

Bug#354130: xbase-clients: "(WW) Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap" with xorg 7.0

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:31:46PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:25:31PM +0100, Silvestre Zabala wrote: > > See subject. > > The fix was provided by ejka on #debian-x: > > > > mkdir /var/lib/xkb/ > > > > With /var/lib/xkb/ X starts correctly. > > Is this an xkb-data bu

Re: Ok to mention ubuntu versions inside Debian archive?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:57:04PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Package: xserver-xorg > > ... > > Version: 1:7.0.0 > > ... > > Pre-Depends: x11-common (>= 7.0.0-0ubuntu3) > > Is this considered OK these days? If it helps people who mix packages (bear in mind that people will certainly

Bug#354577: Patch (attempt #2)

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:04:04PM +0300, Andrew ``Bass'' Shcheglov wrote: > On 2/28/06, Eugene Konev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch is incorrect, as ListFonts request can only take CARD16 as > > maxfonts. > > Probably I'm missing the point, since I'm not a C or X11 guru, but > XListFon

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1393 - branches/modular

On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:56:30PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:53:08PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > wrote: > > Modified: branches/modular/TODO > > === > > --- branches/modular/TODO 2006-0

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1400 - in branches/modular/xserver/xorg-server-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian: . patches

On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:59:14PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Author: dnusinow > Date: 2006-03-05 21:59:13 -0500 (Sun, 05 Mar 2006) > New Revision: 1400 > > Added: > > branches/modular/xserver/xorg-server-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/patches/10_loader_speed_hack.diff > Modifi

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r1400 - in branches/modular/xserver/xorg-server-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian: . patches

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 08:59:16PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:17:47PM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:59:14PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository > > Admin wrote: > > > Log: > > > * Port pat

Re: X kills my powerbook

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:00:31AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:37:35PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Known bug in xorg 6.9, try to go back to 6.8 if you can. > > > I don't know if 7.0 is ready or not (it is in experimental > > > but not yet built for PPC). >

Re: X kills my powerbook

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:55:02AM +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:48:26AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:00 +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:37:35PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > > > Known bug in x

Bug#356300: xserver-xorg: Hurd support for Xorg 7.0 X server

On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 01:00:08AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > In preparation of the future Xorg 7.0 upload, here is a patch that puts > back Hurd support (it got dropped for an unknown reason in the 7.0 > release). We asked several times for porters to please submit patches for 7.0, as the bu

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >