On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote: > I agree that a Mesa upload is overdue (anybody heard anything from > Marcelo?), but I still don't like the package naming as currently in > xorg SVN. I think something like libgl1-mesa-(sw)x11 would be more > accurate than libgl1-mesa-swrast, but I absolutely don't see the point > of going through the pain of renaming libgl1-mesa-dri to libgl1-mesa, as > the former is more accurate.
+1 on moving libgl1-mesa-swrast to libgl1-mesa-swx11. As for -dri and -mesa, the only reason why that happened is because I already had libgl1-mesa for the library and libgl1-mesa-dri for the modules in my tree before Marcelo did 6.4.x. To be honest, I don't care either way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
