On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
> > applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I
> &
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:58:02PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > The RM position is all yours if Branden agrees.
>
> This is where imho you miss the point. It is OUR decision who has to take
> the position as RM inside OUR tea
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 08:43:59AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > but I'll just say that I have no confidence in the XSF as a team. Not to
> > do with you, or Michel, or anything, but I have no confidence that it is
&g
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:58:02PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > Re-reading the bug log and the thread I still cannot understand why you
> > > downgraded the bug in the first place. There is no explanation in the BTS
&g
le this is definitely a
valid report, let me again reiterate that it is in no way RC.
This doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed - it just means that very few
bugs are grave/serious/critical. In my mind, this belongs in the same
severity as 'XFree86 segfaults when I run it on my M9'
; > retitle 223929 [config]: want rewriting when migrating from old-school
> Bug#223929: xserver-xfree86: dpkg-reconfigure does not execute postinst script
> Changed Bug title.
Sorry Branden, I didn't see your bug mangling before I did mine; your
call.
--
Daniel Stone
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 03:13:05AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 08:39:50PM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 06:18:05PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > >
le so switch this restriction on the
> maximum resolution under DRI on and off.
>
> Then they could decide for themselves whether they can live with the
> instability, or verify if it even still exists.
ftp://people.redhat.com/alan/XFree86/Voodoo might be interesting, as
well.
--
D
er the new, bad,
license.
Moral of the story: it's not worth taking stuff from XFree86
unless it's contributed by someone external.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
X.Org monolithic tree: we plan to
migrate to the modular tree when it's practicable.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s, and build a
> package for it ? Currently, I build one manually, which diverts X-provided
> files before unpacking. Maybe the same approach could be taken there ?
No.
> Debian-X people, what do you think of this ?
Package it using the DDK.
--
Daniel Stone
P. You can't distribute
binaries under the GPL, but we have been given permission to distribute
them with sarge.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 03:16:03PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:26:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 08:42:50AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hopefully this is no oh-no-not-again question:
> > >
> > &g
e for packaging the X.org tree?
You still need to rename all the packages (including, but not limited
to, the source package), and deal with all the s/XFree86/Xorg/ mess.
It's very, very non-trivial.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTEC
PCI on ZX1s actually works, the better.
Cheers,
d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
at the time
>you filed it).
>
> Also see revision 1270.
>
> Closing careless duplicate.
Sorry for the duplicate, but I'm sure you're aware that I can't access
the Subversion repository anyway.
Mea culpa.
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone
then you may visit:
http://www.x.org/member/XOrg_Foundation_Election_Nomination.tpl
to enter your candidacy for the X.Org Foundation elections.
We look forward to your membership and candidacy submissions,
The Interim Board
X.Org Foundation.
- End forwarded mes
have turned up - and right now, there are no
official tarballs for any module.
1.1.3 will not change, but others very well may as I complete the sync
from the monolithic tree (botched the header sync, which I'm still
sorting out).
Thanks,
Dan
Branden, are we allowed to do this without bumping soname? I thought you
had to bump the second number for additions, first for removals. But I
could be wrong.
:) d, too deep in X server code to try to remember the specifics of
library versioning
--
t least an hour of
sleep before I have to get up for uni.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:25:49AM +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:39:11AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:48:08AM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > [stuff]
> >
> > For record, the report concerns the
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:22:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 01:38:36PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:03:15AM -0700, Branden Robinson (via BTS) wrote:
> > > 1) Please don't file duplicate bugs (see #238276).
> >
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 10:52:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:06:49AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:03:14PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > Author: branden
> > > Date: 2004-
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:51:58AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:05:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > A leading underscore is universally accepted to denote
> > 'internal' [...]
>
> I don't know about "universally". Anyo
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 12:12:24AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 11:28:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:51:58AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > > Now, I'll grant that large parts of X11 predate the C standards, but
>
gt; And I have to say, after reading Daniel's irrelevant and incoherent
> response to my post, I have a much greater understanding of why you
> decided to stop working with him! :)
plonk.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
re might be better way to do so, this is one of
> them, others and probably betters can come later on by more experienced
> people. (Branded, does this ring a bell? ;))
Err, why not just re-define it to NO in host.def if you need to?
--
Daniel Stone
sting on the relevant
hardware: I have a Radeon 9000 which can be used for testing Radeon
stuff, but I just assumed it had been tested when it was asserted that
it was thoroughly unnecessary.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the
that they're useless with microcode.
This is all a mixture of IIRC and AIUI, and I'll try to test .dfsg when
I get home (dialup sucks), but yeah. It looks like we've crippled
radeon_drv. :(
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTEC
her contributors, and that whatever copyright
the authors (in this case, VIA/S3) have put on the code, stands. Whether
or not it was later merged into XFree86 by an external party (Mr.
Dawes), is completely irrelevant.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y that I have one
hundred per cent confidence in the tree as it stands, and that moving to
6.7.0 is pointless and a waste of time.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.
with very, very few code
changes, being built with the modular build system. Works for fbdev and
ati, with acceleration (but not DRI) on ATI.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:25:42PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Replying from my PDA is hard, so I'll just briefly say that I have one
> >hundred per cent confidence in the tree as it stands,
> Um, in the X.org tree, you mean? (Or in the Debia
0405100146.tar.bz2 which
works if you run little-endian Linux, and want to build a static
server with either fbdev or ATI (acceleration works for the
latter).
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operat
believe there
> is a little, unfortunately.)
OK, that'd be great - thanks a lot for your work.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
indeed). I was not able to find out what Debian packages I
> have to install to get the needed headers to support xbm.
Given no-one uses it, I don't think there are actually any packages in
Debian supporting it. Try stealing some of the code from that
o well, so
Xizzle is deprecated in favour of Debrix, despite having a cooler name.
Geddit?
[0]: Well, two; you'll see later.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
riables; all variables need to be resolved at
load time, whereas functions get lazy resolution.
[2]: Not so Joe Blow can be arsing around with driver code, but so
people will feel empowered to help with FTBFSes and packaging
problems, to submit bugs with patches, et al - so t
ild system
> alongside and build either way. That's the current plan, but no-one has
> gotten started doing the work; I was going to look into it, but I really
> have other things I think I should be working on instead.
I'm honestly not sure how well
[0]: Changes made since it was branched off the monolithic tree back in
November or something and X11R6.7.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d a
great deal of the missing xapps, which I discovered last night - word),
and xserver and some of the drivers to autotools. We've already
committed, and it's way too late to go back and work with a build system
we're all unfamiliar with.
--
Daniel Stone
andle more than one
> implementation. Other people can join and package other parts from other
> sources.
I don't think separate X servers will require too much work at all, once
it's modularised. Remember, uploading tiny changes in tiny packages is
*easy*.
--
Daniel Stone
aged), or whatever, but Xorg should come per
default - most people aren't qualified to make that choice, and shouldn't
have to.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:04:47PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > We could also start the slow app migration, and autotool missing apps as
> > we go; for the time being, just disable the ones that are there. Moving
> > to
etween the projects would work to everyone's benefit. The
> +redistributors, and thus most end users, were expected to continue using
> +XFree86, at the very least until FreeDesktop.Org had a replacement finished.
Please s/FreeDesktop.Org/freedesktop.org/.
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:58:31PM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Don, 2003-04-03 at 10:04, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Yes, and how much work on the packages do you guys both do?
>
> Thanks for your appreciation. How many patches have you been able to drop
> from your
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:14:26PM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Don, 2003-04-03 at 15:21, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Except that it will be uninstallable and unbuildable for
> > everything/everyone that doesn't have 4.3.
>
> Simple: 4.3.0 goes to experimental, as doe
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Xavier Bestel scrawled:
> when using the packages from Daniel Stone, mldonkey_gui (using labl_gtk,
> using gtk+1.2) segfaults. I tried with DISPLAY=:0 and with
> DISPLAY=localhost:0, nearly the same result.
>
> Ask if you're intereste
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:44:28PM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:21:36PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I've already got SPARC under control - it's ported, and there's a box
> > with a porter already I can use to build the debs. Right now,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:03:17PM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Don, 2003-04-03 at 15:23, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:16:21PM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> >
> > > Anyway, why not simply drop xlibmesa*-glu, seeing as they are the same
>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:08:52AM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Fre, 2003-04-04 at 00:44, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > So what's different from what we have now, apart from the name of the
> > external repository,
>
> experimental isn't external. It
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:25:45AM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Fre, 2003-04-04 at 00:57, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > *sigh*. Imagine this.
> >
> > Qt has a compile-time ./configure check for Xrandr. If it finds it, it
> > enables a few Xrandr related feat
Hi Branden!
I'm planning on applying all of these patches for -0ds3v2; do you have
any issue with this?
-d
- Forwarded message from Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: [Fwd: Radeon patches for X4.3]
From: Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Stone
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:53:18PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 01:50:40PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Hi Branden!
> > I'm planning on applying all of these patches for -0ds3v2; do you have
> > any issue with this?
>
> No, pleas
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:02:26AM +0200, Sven Luther scrawled:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 01:45:55PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Well, the maintainer dist-upgrades and gets 4.3.
>
> He will get an immediate bug report from the autobuilders :)))
>
> I believe that the w
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:40:14PM +0200, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
> On Fre, 2003-04-04 at 05:44, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > ... an extra deb line ...
>
> Just like yours now.
Yep; just the same.
> > apt-get dist-upgrade gives you everything that's been randomly dumped
>
do not accept our fate and
drive to completion the family jewels.
- http://www.bigshed.com/cgi-bin/speak.cgi
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
- End forwarded message -
--
Daniel Sto
I didn't file a bug about it.
Bug needs to be filed on gzip about the 'gzip killer' .bdf.
(Yes, I can confirm this bug on my Alpha).
-d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e I don't like having my
> system hard lock.
It's already gone in, but I use unmanaged sessions, so I've not got a
chance to test it. :)
(I am, of course, presuming that this is the Radeon lockup DRI bug).
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s,
> mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>
> This should be investigated. s390 should be able to build xnest, xvfb,
> and xprt. Losing xvfb will kill some Tk and Python-related stuff that
> absolutely insists on having a live X server just to build.
Hm ... ok, I'll revert va
rd
> to it.
>
> In any case, when doing a merge, please note the fact in the changelog.
> I'll endeavor to do the same.
Nope, I haven't actually used svn merge yet. Keeping it simple. :)
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
"Device"
Identifier "Radeon 9000"
Driver "radeon"
Option "UseFBDev" "true"
Option "AGPSize" "64"
Option "AGPMode&quo
orporated a large Wacom patch (from the Wacom sf.net crew, I
think) into my XFree86 4.3 packages, but I don't know if it adds Cintiq
support.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp
closing.
> Bug closed, send any further explanations to Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've handled this in private, too. Seems my BTS solution for reportbug
isn't working. :|
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Kon
I thought good news would never arrive! :)
- Forwarded message from Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:20:03 +0200
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: patches for GNU/FreeBSD
Message-ID: <[E
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:33:12PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I have attempted to build from source on current sid on a x86
> Daniel Stone experiemntal package xfree86_4.3.0-0ds4v3 at
> http://penguinppc.org/~daniels/sid/source/
> but this fails miserably.
I'm aware of #1 and
ately.
So, this is the canonical answer: it won't install right now,
unfortunately.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
try to start kdm from the console.
Yeah, this is a problem with ?dm and authorization. Try 'startx' from
the command line.
For the BTS, the problem is that gcc3.3 screws up authentication somehow
- either cpp3.3's semantics changing, or miscompiled code. This has been
seen to happen
#x27;s a problem with libutahglx1. If
you're complaining that it's uninstallable because of the conflict,
there's nothing we can do, obviously. You probably want Mesa rather than
Utah, anyway.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
r days (when exams
are over), and see if that fixes it.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
; What makes you think anyone has any Debian XFree86 packages of 4.3.0
> built with GCC 3.3? That version of the compiler was made the default
> in unstable *after* Daniel Stone did his last release in the "ds"
> experimental series.
>
> Please stop being so reckless wit
ou obtain those sources? Only my private repository for
porters contains 4.3.0-0pre1v1.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e breakage (miscompilation). We already know that startx and
running apps works, it's the ?dm stuff that breaks.
Please read bug reports before you dismiss them.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melb
o far is that building with -O
appears to make the breakage go away on i386, thanks to testing by Colin
Walters.
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
--NPWyolIJAVLYbHY6
Content-T
retitle 196718 [xfree86]: gcc3.3 screws up authentication at -O2, -O needed
severity 196718 important
reassign 196718 xfree86
tags 196718 =3D patch sid sarge
merge 196554 196718
tags 196554 + pending
thanks
*sigh*. The only bright note out of this so far is that building with -O
appears to make th
ms, but if no-one figures out in the next few days, I'll have a bash
when they're finished.
Cheers!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
c++5-3.3-dev to satiffy
I thought we were just using the changelog to close bugs (heh), not to
notify everyone of everything?
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and revert it after 2.1.4-4. Please upgrade freetype2 to 2.1.4-4
>
> 2) I just commited #003 patch update to subversion branches/4.3.0/sid
> With this change, FontLibSharedFreeType will be always disable.
> Please update #003 patch.
Thanks a lot! :)
--
Daniel S
of having an exam tomorrow morning
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y error
output?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 03:36:10PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:28:23PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Yo Robert!
> > I'm going to look at your patches soon, promise! Exams finish in 2 days,
> > mmm ...
> >
> >
anything wrote
> with ISHIKAWA-san's update to debian/changelog. It was a fairly
> important change to the build process.
My apologies for misunderstanding; I'm glad it's out in the clear now.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECT
change over to branches/4.3.0/sid once I have fixed it on the trunk?
I'll be doing a few things on branches/4.3.0/sid tonight, mainly merging
back from branch and taking into account all the private mail I've got
from porters. Gimme about 8 hours.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMA
ot supported in stock XFree86
4.3.0, it is supported in the Debian packages of 4.3.0, and will be in
all releases the X Strike Force make of XFree86 4.3.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I did fix this in Subversion, and I'll roll a new source to send out to
a few porters tonight.
> Is this before or after your failure? Is it from the same source or did
> Daniel add the fix he suggested for this to the source?
What James was reporting wasn't
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:31:40PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:49:32AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:22:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > The goal is NOT to make the package changelogs less massive. The goal
>
f to merge from
trunk/ to branches/. I was going to do it last night but real life
rudely interrupted, grabbed me by the shoulders, and shook vigorously.
I'll be home in a few hours, and able to do it then.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:14:10AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> And fix #184; kernel-headers-2.4 kernel-headers-2.4 [...], indeed.
If, by #184, I meant #183.
That settles it, I'm going to bed.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAI
out which virtual package FreeBSD
> >> provides (note the debian/control change: instead of kernel-headers-2.4 | hurd |
> >> ...), it's now a per-architecture Build-Dep.
>
> Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related
> defined. They are al
've prepped -0ds5, but libglide3 stupidity means you can't even
install the damn package, let alone use it, so I've put -0ds5 on the
backburner (it's branches/4.3.0/sid, with a unique version number). Ah
well, can't say I didn't try. ;)
Stupid mips/mipsel are ICEin
), and we hope to have it fixed in
the next XFree86 release, whether that be 4.2.1-8, or 4.3.0-1. Please do
not ask us when it will be ready; we don't know.
Cheers!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop ne
e to see the patch #48 which is in repository right now to
> be replaced with the attached patch.
>
> Best regards and thank you for your wonderful work.
Thanks for this one, Martin!
I've just committed this to Subversion now, as #206.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTE
Anything i could do to help ?
Thanks,
geoff Brimhall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
- End forwarded message -
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED
my mouse a lot in the console of my Mac,
which has a mice with ... yep, you guessed it - one button!).
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t least 90% of current sid architectures (me).
4.3.0-0pre3:
* xlibs/xbase-clients splits (Branden?).
* Build on all current sid architectures (me).
4.3.0-0rc1:
* Bugfixes only from pre3.
4.3.0-1:
* Profit.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTE
whether the various architectures *should*
work or not.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ed entries like "_description" that I replaced by
> "Description". I can provide a patch if necessary.
This was fixed ages ago - Marcelo's backports of my packages are
absolutely ancient.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e
package will be grabbing it from a different place.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> version. This step would save me a lot of user enquiries...
Getting the new Savage driver in would also be great.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:34:21AM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:31:50PM +0200, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> >>Please include the CVS HEAD version of the SiS driver (which compiles
> >>and works with 4.3.0) in Debi
tions) $(_NULLCMD_)
> # define _NormalCleanDir() $(_NULLCMD_)
> #else
> @@ -120,7 +121,7 @@
> # define _NormalObjCompile(options) NormalRelocLibObjCompile(options)
> # else
> # define _NormalObjCompile(options) NormalLibObjCompile(options)
> -@@ -219,7 +2
401 - 500 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
