On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-18 09:02]: > > * Should we regard X.Org or FreeDesktop.Org as our upstream source? > > Yes, I'd go with one of them. Keith Packard is also in the NM queue > and interested in helping out. > > > * Should we go our own way starting from the "sanitized" XFree86 CVS > > snapshot we've prepared? > > I think this would be a really bad idea. I think it would be much > better to try to get all of our patches integrated upstream, and I > hear that the new upstream people (X.Org/FreeDesktop.Org) are much > more interested in integrating porting patches than XFree86 was. > Since Keith Packard is also on our lists, I hope that he'll help with > forwarding patches upstream and getting them integrated.
Anyone can forward patches upstream. There are a reasonable amount of
people who can integrate them. Once libX11 is merged with the monolithic
tree[0], I'm going to be throwing the xlibs tree open to features again,
including patch merges from the major vendors as a priority.
[0]: Changes made since it was branched off the monolithic tree back in
November or something and X11R6.7.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
