Re: Bug#365488: Current GNOME crashes X

2006-05-18 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:16:01AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 12:26 -0500, Donald King a écrit : > > Ever since a GNOME upgrade around late April, I haven't been able to use > > GNOME at all. By downgrading to Sarge versions of the kernel, X, and > > GNOME, I narrow

darling Schoolgirrls doing beauteous succking.

2006-05-18 Thread Mitchell Addison
pulchritudinous Teenie in harrdcore acttion! http://fatgirlssite.info/igass.htm?gfibjW-M.YbRQR,gfibjW,VSd U_N_S_U_BB_$_C_R_I_B_E http://fatgirlssite.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366355: libx11: ssh -X between Sarges XF86 and Sids Xorg7 - static Nedit works -> Nedit bug?

2006-05-18 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! I did some more testing... - Sid/ppc -> Sid/ppc : works - Sid/ppc -> Sarge/i386 : doesn't work (same error) - Sid/ppc -> Sarge/m68k : doesn't work (same error) Whereas "Sid/ppc ->" means that I'm connecting from my desktop via ssh -X to the remote box. - Sid/ppc -> Sarge/i386 starting "wo

Bug#364288: Bug#331435: xserver-xorg: Mouse pointer occasionally vanishes

2006-05-18 Thread Tore Anderson
* Michel Dänzer > Both of you, please also make sure (e.g. using xlsclients) that there > are no 'hidden' clients that could interfere, and that killing the > clients actually causes them to close their X display connection (and > possibly open a new one). I checked this, there is no client lef

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2169 - in trunk/debian/xorg/debian: . po

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: bubulle Date: 2006-05-18 09:20:55 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2169 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/hu.po Log: Hungarian translation update Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog ==

50 cdr 80 verbatim pour 7.90 Euros

2006-05-18 Thread Eurotape
Title: 50 cdr 80 verbatim pour 7.90 Euros Si cette page ne s'affiche pas correctement dans votre messagerie, cliquez ici Ce message vous a été envoyé pou

Bug#365134: which X server is correct?

2006-05-18 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
I just ran into this problem as well, and was about to report the same workaround (changing /usr/bin/X11/xdm to /usr/bin/xdm in /etc/init.d/xdm and /etc/X11/default-display-manager). But I'm still not sure which X server to use in /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers. There's -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1878204 200

Bug#365134: Dirty work around

2006-05-18 Thread Matt Taylor
I got this working by changing: in /etc/init.d/xdm: /usr/bin/X11/xdm to /usr/bin/xdm in /etc/X11/default-display-manager: /usr/bin/X11/xdm to /usr/bin/xdm in /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers: /usr/bin/X to /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg I am hoping that there will soon be an upgrade that will set the config files to

Bug#367947: Ultra10 X Problems after dist-upgrade

2006-05-18 Thread Stremler
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 I recently did an apt-get update ; apt-get dist-upgrade, and when all was said and done, X no longer worked. I still get the speckled screen and the X pointer for just a second, and then it quits with a signal 11. The startx output, config

Bug#367979: x-window-system-core is broken/missing fonts.alias file?

2006-05-18 Thread rds
Package: x-window-system-core Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Description: x-window-system-core is broken/missing fonts.alias file? Debian / testing Hi, Installed kdebase and x-window-system-core packages. However, "startx" results in the "could not open default font 'fixed';" error. According to the ht

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2170 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 21:43:59 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2170 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.config.in trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.preinst.in Log: Fix several bugs in the new debconfage Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.config.in =

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2171 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 22:36:20 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2171 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control Log: * Increment version with xdm conflict to the current version in testing and unstable. (closes: #363462) Modified: trunk

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2172 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 22:44:53 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2172 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control Log: Fix formatting gaff Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control === --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2172 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-18 Thread Russ Allbery
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Author: dnusinow > Date: 2006-05-18 22:44:53 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) > New Revision: 2172 > Modified: >trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control > Log: > Fix formatting gaff Incidentally, per the latest Debian Policy, it's now legal t

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2173 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 23:44:06 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2173 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: Prepare changelog for release Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debi

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2174 - tags/debian/xorg

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 23:45:13 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2174 Added: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.0.19/ Log: Tag upload of xorg-1:7.0.19 to unstable Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.0.19 (from rev 2173, trunk/debian/xorg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2175 - trunk/app/xdm/debian

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 23:45:34 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2175 Modified: trunk/app/xdm/debian/changelog Log: Prepare changelog for release Modified: trunk/app/xdm/debian/changelog === --- trunk/app/xdm/debi

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2176 - tags/app/xdm

2006-05-18 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-05-18 23:47:17 -0400 (Thu, 18 May 2006) New Revision: 2176 Added: tags/app/xdm/xdm-1:1.0.4-1/ Log: Tag upload of xdm-1:1.0.4-1 to unstable Copied: tags/app/xdm/xdm-1:1.0.4-1 (from rev 2175, trunk/app/xdm) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Bug#366695: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363427: marked as done (x11-common: /tmp/.ICE-unix not created on startup if $VERBOSE=no)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363427: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366516: marked as done (boot process of fresh etch installation does not lead to graphic login: inconsistent paths /usr/bin vs /usr/bin/X11)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365134: marked as done (wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong places)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366695: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core on etch.)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#331553: marked as done (Xsession could set +e when interpreting 3rd party scripts)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331553: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363699: marked as done (x11-common: The /usr/X11R6/bin symlink is not removed when the package is purged)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363699: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365134: marked as done (wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong places)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367197: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366516: marked as done (boot process of fresh etch installation does not lead to graphic login: inconsistent paths /usr/bin vs /usr/bin/X11)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#362885: marked as done (x11-common: unable to upgrade, rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362885: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#347481: marked as done (Forgotten quotes around argument in 20x11-common_process-args)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#347481: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367227: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366599: marked as done (xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have /usr/X11R6/bin/X)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365383: marked as done (xdm has stopped being launched at boot)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#335348: marked as done (x11-common: Please add LSB formatted dependency info in init.d script)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335348: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366599: marked as done (xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have /usr/X11R6/bin/X)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363462: marked as done (xdm: no login possible after restart of xdm)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363169: marked as done (xserver-xorg gets removed by x11-common rather than upgraded)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363169: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#364087: marked as done (x11-common: changelog.Debian.old missing from all XOrg modular packages)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364087: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#365383: marked as done (xdm has stopped being launched at boot)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367227: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363462: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367197: marked as done (xdm does not start after last upgrade)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367556: marked as done (/etc/init.d/x11-common doesn't setup ICE socket unless in verbose mode)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367556: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363462: marked as done (xdm: no login possible after restart of xdm)

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365134: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366378: marked as done (KDE is not starting on /etc/default/rcS VERBOSE=no (with fix))

2006-05-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 May 2006 21:02:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366378: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.19 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your