Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xserver-xorg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg
> severity 365693 grave
Bug#365693: xserver-xorg: I got an error code 10 when making apt-get upgrade
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 365693 365282
Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails
package xserver-xorg
severity 365693 grave
merge 365693 365282
thanks
On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 7:30 AM, Pelgrims Jean-Francois
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.14
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> With my last apt-get upgrade, I got an error 10 with xserver-xorg
>
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
Severity: wishlist
Error description:
Hello Maintainer-Team,
under Woody I have used the options -l and -lf to get logfiles.
I had allways:
204676 2006-04-10 15:19 ~/log/xterm/20060329141847-devel.private:3
11605 2006-04-13 14:35 ~/log/xterm/200604
> On Mon, 1 May 2006 14:56:47 +0200
> "AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AM>
AM> On 2005-02-24 Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> reopen 293480
>> thanks
AM>
AM> Why did you reopen the bug? I fail to reproduce it on sarge.
AM> cu and- sending to [EMAIL PROT
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.4a-1
Severity: serious
Hold on, this is a multistep bugreport which covers a couple of issues
and *might* finally boil down to xaw3dg-dev and/or libxaw.
According to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=emacs21,
building of emacs after the last NMU failed on m
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.15
Followup-For: Bug #363248
I just wanted to bump this to stay the bug is still happening
with 7.0.15. No matter which protocol is selected, ExplorerPS/2 is
always written to file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Hi,
as mentionned above,
the problem involves the xserver-xorg.config.in script.
it affects upgrade and new install procedure of the
xserver-xorg package (and of course all of the package
(including x-window-system) depending on it).
I suggest you applying the patch from Steven Brown
(Thank
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some reason, I am seeing xbase-clients at 1:7.0.0-5 rather than
> 1:7.0.15, and the list of binary packages for xorg doesn't include
> xbase-clients. I'm not reopening the bug because I am guessing this
> is the result of some transition that I've o
Hi,
Hope Ia am not writing to wrong address. aI am nice, pretty looking
girl. I am planning on visiting your town this month. Can
awea meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 08:57:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362560: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-v4l 0.0.1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 08:57:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363665: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-v4l 0.0.1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 08:57:46 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295995: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-v4l 0.0.1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:06:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293480 acknowledged by developer (Bug#286164: fixed in
xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.15
Installation fails. here is the output:
Preconfiguring packages ...
xserver-xorg failed to preconfigure, with exit status 10
(Reading database ... 150223 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace xserver-xorg 1:7.0.14 (using
.../xs
On 2006-05-01 Martin Šlouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to clarify: Can you see unresolved references in libxcursor1 with
>> *current* debian unstable? Do you have problems with gaphor on Debian
>> unstable?
> no, i dont have unresolved references in current debian unstable.
> everything is
Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:06:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293480 acknowledged by developer (Bug#286164: fixed in
xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:06:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293480 acknowledged by developer (Bug#286164: fixed in
xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 2 May 2006 19:06:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293480 acknowledged by developer (Bug#286164: fixed in
xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
with regard to the complaint about /etc/X11/X, I compared with another
system. on the other one it was a relative symlink, on the current
system with the error it was absolute. so i recreated it as relative,
identical to other system, but this complaint still occurs.
also, it is true that /var/
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:13:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 01 May 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Hello people,
> > >
> > > could you package the "xset" program as part of the X Strike Force ?
> > > The package
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> could you package the "xset" program as part of the X Strike Force ?
> The package already exists in Ubuntu and is maintained by Daniel Stone.
> It is used by the package acpi-support that I'd like to integrate in
> Debian.
It's in
- Forwarded message from Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: XOrg transition, status of libxaw8
From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 19:18:17 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id:
Hi,
I recall that it was announ
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > Quoting Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > > The debconf question xserver-xorg/config/i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 364932 sid
Bug#364932: xorg: My keyboard no longer works after upgrading
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xserver-xorg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xserver-xorg
> severity 365755 grave
Bug#365755: installation fails
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 365755 365282
Bug#365282: xserver-xorg 7.0.15 fails installation (pre-inst exit status 10)
Bug#365
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.8.0-1
Severity: wishlist
the chip-id-override does of course fix the problem; it works fine with 0x3150
and 0x5460. i get hardware acceleration when i add the chip-id to
/kernel/drivers/char/drm/drm_pciids.h
(i have already reported the chip-id as
package xserver-xorg
severity 365755 grave
merge 365755 365282
thanks
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:09:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.0.15
>
>
> Installation fails. here is the output:
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> xserver-xorg failed to precon
Just wondering if there are any plans to update x11proto-gl to 1.4.7?
I ask because I'm trying to build xgl and its seems to require this version
and I'm too lazy to build xorg myself :).
Thanks
//andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
tags 354674 - experimental
thanks
Hi,
What's the status of this bug? It is blocking me from uploading AbiWord,
which has a RC fix or two going for it, because it won't build due to
this missing libxcursor.la.
Thanks,
--
Joshua Kwan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:05:03PM +0300, Shai Berger wrote:
> Nope. It doesn't work for me yet. I'll just bypass it in my .xinitrc.
Setting XKBPATH works fine for me, can you please explain how you proceed
so that I can reproduce your problem?
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: libx11-dev
Version: 2:1.0.0-6
Followup-For: Bug #337692
I tried to compile different software using X headers (eg wmxmms,
wmpower and the dri radeon drivers) and encountered the same problem in
each of the compilation steps. It's always complaining about
/usr/include/X11/Xlib.h:3578:
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-5
Severity: minor
Both startx and xinit man pages should be updated as they still talk about:
/usr/lib/X11/xinit
/usr/X11R6/bin
which doesn't exist in modular Xorg.
Also, startx (and/or xinit) man page should mention difference between
~/.xsession and ~/.
On Wednesday, May 3 2006 01:29, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:05:03PM +0300, Shai Berger wrote:
> > Nope. It doesn't work for me yet. I'll just bypass it in my .xinitrc.
>
> Setting XKBPATH works fine for me, can you please explain how you proceed
> so that I can reproduce your
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:47:05PM +0200, Carlos wrote:
> Package: xkb-data
> Version: 0.8-5
> Severity: important
>
>
> With this keyboard layout, pressing AltGR (or right Alt) allowed the user to
> input special characters (for example, AltGr+; = dead acute, AltGr+Shift+1 =
> inverted exclamati
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 12:34:08AM +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
> Package: xkb-data
> Version: 0.8-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
> i've been using a custom keyboard layout on my ibook for
> more than a year. It's derived from the popular fr_new layout. Tonight,
> i've dist-upgrade my SID :
> -
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:08:35PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:44:01AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:40:03AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > > Quoting Adam Borowski (
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:27:03PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> What's the status of this bug? It is blocking me from uploading AbiWord,
> which has a RC fix or two going for it, because it won't build due to
> this missing libxcursor.la.
The .la file is gone and it's not coming back. The packages
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 08:13:31AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 01 May 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Hello people,
> > >
> > > could you package the "xset" program as part of the X Strike Force ?
> > > The package
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 21:52:55 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2079
Added:
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/patches/15_security_allocate_local.diff
Modified:
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/changelog
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-1.0.2/debian/patches/series
Lo
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 22:02:10 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2080
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in
Log:
emulate3buttons questions when they don't exist. Thanks Rodney Gordon II,
Adam Borowski. Thanks to Stev
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 22:13:41 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2081
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/scripts/vars.alpha
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/scripts/vars.amd64
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/scripts/vars.arm
trunk/debian/xorg/deb
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 22:22:26 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2082
Modified:
trunk/lib/xft/debian/changelog
Log:
* Add closer
Modified: trunk/lib/xft/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/lib/xft/debian/changelog
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 22:24:43 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2083
Modified:
trunk/lib/xft/debian/changelog
trunk/lib/xft/debian/rules
Log:
* Run dh_install with --list-missing
Modified: trunk/lib/xft/debian/changelog
=
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 22:31:55 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2084
Modified:
trunk/lib/xft/debian/changelog
trunk/lib/xft/debian/control
trunk/lib/xft/debian/rules
Log:
* Fix package name in rules file so that the debugging symbols go to the
right place. Thanks Tim J
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-02 23:18:59 -0400 (Tue, 02 May 2006)
New Revision: 2085
Added:
tags/lib/xft/xft-2.1.8.2-7/
Log:
Tag upload of xft 2.1.8.2-7 to unstable
Copied: tags/lib/xft/xft-2.1.8.2-7 (from rev 2084, trunk/lib/xft)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 20:17:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363507: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 20:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363922: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 20:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365341: fixed in xft 2.1.8.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 23:26:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363316: libxft-dev should no longer depend on x-dev, but
on x11proto-core-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-03 00:04:07 -0400 (Wed, 03 May 2006)
New Revision: 2086
Modified:
trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/changelog
Log:
Prepare changelog for upload
Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/changelog
===
---
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-03 00:07:35 -0400 (Wed, 03 May 2006)
New Revision: 2087
Added:
tags/app/xbase-clients/xbase-clients-1:7.0.1-1/
Log:
Tag upload of xbase-clients-1:7.0.1-1 to unstable
Copied: tags/app/xbase-clients/xbase-clients-1:7.0.1-1 (from rev 2086,
trunk/app/xbase-clients)
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-03 00:20:30 -0400 (Wed, 03 May 2006)
New Revision: 2088
Added:
tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1:1.0.2-8/
Log:
Tag upload of xorg-server-1:1.0.2-8 to unstable
Copied: tags/xserver/xorg-server/xorg-server-1:1.0.2-8 (from rev 2087,
trunk/xserver/xorg-server-
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-03 00:36:14 -0400 (Wed, 03 May 2006)
New Revision: 2089
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
Log:
Prepare changelog for upload to unstable
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===
---
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-03 00:38:01 -0400 (Wed, 03 May 2006)
New Revision: 2090
Added:
tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.0.16/
Log:
Tag upload of xorg-1:7.0.16 to unstable
Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.0.16 (from rev 2089, trunk/debian/xorg)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:17:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365022: fixed in xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354146: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#354146: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 02 May 2006 21:47:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365282: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: xfs
Version: 1:1.0.1-4
Severity: normal
Upon start of daemon through init.d service reports:
# service xfs start
Setting up X font server socket directory /tmp/.font-unix...done.
Starting X font server: xfs/usr/bin/xfs error: CONFIG: extra value for parameter
"default-resolutions"
Al
> Sweet! Let's just kill it then. I'll add some code to the postinst to
> remove the questions all together. Christian, let's just make it dead and
> give the translators a little rest :-)
Ack. They will love this..:)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
63 matches
Mail list logo
